Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Corral heading to IR

Floppin

By Floppin,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Billy Love Mentor

Billy Love

Posted
Posted

Corral’s injury is a direct result of Rhule’s piss poor handling of him. If he’s was not ready or not what we thought he was, fine. You bring the kid along slowly, you carefully develope him. But to not give Corral any reps to speak of and then throw him in the fire with the 3-4 string OL is shameful. Matt Rhule can fug off an go eat a big bag of donkey d!cks. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Floppin said:

I feel like it's pretty obvious that Baker was not Rhule's decision. Otherwise we wouldn't be having this sham of a QB competition. I think once it was realized that Corral wasn't ready that Fitt (possibly with Tepper's greenlight) went and got Baker and now Rhule is being a crybaby bitch about it because Sam is his guy. 

This is also why there's the reports of drama in the locker room about the competition and why Fitterer was obviously annoyed with the competition while speaking about it during his in booth interview during the game.

Before we go here let's wait and see how he plays this weeks reps..  If Baker is getting the bulk in practice and 1 series in the Game.. We know he is just playing this up to cuddle Darnold and keep hope alive for a trade scenario.. but he knows who the starter is..

If he is still doing the split poo.. Rhule is completely being a bitch about Darnold and can't evaluate or read the room.. And we're headed to some BS disfunction due to Rhule's ego...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

IMO the timing suggests otherwise. Seems like we wanted to assess where Corral was in his development to see if he could legit compete for the job and when it was clear he was nowhere near ready then we shifted gears to go get Mayfield.

They were looking at Mayfield before they ever drafted Corral, before they even knew they would have a chance to draft him.

And realistically, minicamp wouldn't have presented a sufficient opportunity to evaluate a rookie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rippadonn Grand Master

rippadonn

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, Floppin said:

I feel like it's pretty obvious that Baker was not Rhule's decision. Otherwise we wouldn't be having this sham of a QB competition. I think once it was realized that Corral wasn't ready that Fitt (possibly with Tepper's greenlight) went and got Baker and now Rhule is being a crybaby bitch about it because Sam is his guy. 

This is also why there's the reports of drama in the locker room about the competition and why Fitterer was obviously annoyed with the competition while speaking about it during his in booth interview during the game.

Was Corral Rhules decision? Doesn't look like it. Not one bit. Actually the opposite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Floppin Grand Master

Floppin

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, WOW!! said:

Before we go here let's wait and see how he plays this weeks reps..  If Baker is getting the bulk in practice and 1 series in the Game.. We know he is just playing this up to cuddle Darnold and keep hope alive for a trade scenario.. but he knows who the starter is..

If he is still doing the split poo.. Rhule is completely being a bitch about Darnold and can't evaluate or read the room.. And we're headed to some BS disfunction due to Rhule's ego...

Oh I think he realizes the writing is on the wall and he's going to have to start Baker and that was obvious in the reps during the shared practices last week. That doesn't change my point though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, Billy Love said:

Corral’s injury is a direct result of Rhule’s piss poor handling of him. If he’s was not ready or not what we thought he was, fine. You bring the kid along slowly, you carefully develope him. But to not give Corral any reps to speak of and then throw him in the fire with the 3-4 string OL is shameful. Matt Rhule can fug off an go eat a big bag of donkey d!cks. 

Again how is it the coaching staff fault that they give him reps and he gets hurt getting the reps ppl wanted him to get??

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rippadonn Grand Master

rippadonn

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, Floppin said:

I feel like it's pretty obvious that Baker was not Rhule's decision. Otherwise we wouldn't be having this sham of a QB competition. I think once it was realized that Corral wasn't ready that Fitt (possibly with Tepper's greenlight) went and got Baker and now Rhule is being a crybaby bitch about it because Sam is his guy. 

This is also why there's the reports of drama in the locker room about the competition and why Fitterer was obviously annoyed with the competition while speaking about it during his in booth interview during the game.

Let's say Baker wasn't his decision, maybe Fitts. Does that explain Sam. PJ? Teddy?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Floppin Grand Master

Floppin

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

Was Corral Rhules decision? Doesn't look like it. Not one bit. Actually the opposite.

If you watch the draft day footage he agreed with the pick but you could tell it was just because he agreed with the positional value. I think Darnold has been his guy the whole time while everyone else realized that he wasn't the answer. And then once it was confirmed during minicamp and OTAs that Corral also wasn't, for this year anyhow, they got serious about acquiring Baker.

Edited by Floppin
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
rippadonn Grand Master

rippadonn

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, WOW!! said:

Again how is it the coaching staff fault that they give him reps and he gets hurt getting the reps ppl wanted him to get??

He didn't get hurt in live practice because he didn't get any. Only imaginary. I'm not sure about the technology, but I hear it's going places, like to the bottom.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Floppin said:

Oh I think he realizes the writing is on the wall and he's going to have to start Baker and that was obvious in the reps during the shared practices last week. That doesn't change my point though.

We will see. Like you said he maybe talking this and that.. But his actions are showing that even he sees Baker is the starter..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jackie Lee Grand Master

Jackie Lee

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Floppin said:

If you watch the draft day footage he agreed with the pick but you could tell it was just because he agreed with the positional value. I think Darnold has been his guy the whole time while everyone else realized that he wasn't the answer. And then once it was confirmed during minicamp and OTAs they got serious about acquiring Baker.

Yeah Rhule probably begged to let Sam have one last shot in OTA's to prove himself, and Fitt was like I've seen enough I'm getting Baker. I get the feeling Fitt isn't trying to lose his job for the sake of making Rhule happy anymore. I'd love for him to have control over certain roster cuts, can't trust Rhule with some of his nepotism guys that shouldn't be on NFL rosters

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jay Roosevelt
      fug the HATERS

      By Jay Roosevelt · Posted

      No, you're right. It doesn't mean you can't call out his flaws and poor play. But it also doesn't mean you can't admit when he plays well and shows improvement. Not you personally, just in general I mean.
    • Jay Roosevelt
      fug the HATERS

      By Jay Roosevelt · Posted

      I will say, I do think there's a version of Bryce that could be really successful as a high-volume passer in a spread-based offense built around quick throws and timing-based intermediate throws with deeper throws schemed up around them. I actually think the power run based offense we're running is a poor fit for Bryce as it requires him to play under center far more often. It's a very traditional offensive approach whereas I think a scheme that spreads defenses out and lets Bryce distribute the ball quickly with anticipation and accuracy is the sweet spot for him. The key, of course, is to find a way to run the ball efficiently out of those formations. Our personnel right now (backs and OL) aren't good fits for that style of offense and I'm not sure it's a scheme Dave Canales favors very much either.
    • Martin
      fug the HATERS

      By Martin · Posted

      I root for him, and I hope for the best, as does essentially everyone. But that doesn’t mean you can’t call out flaws and bad plays. And that’s what a lot of people get wrong.  I hope I’m wrong and that he continues to improve a lot, I just doubt it. But I’ve been wrong before 
×
×
  • Create New...