Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Corral to IR is a good thing….


Panthers Fan 69
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Panthers Fan 69 said:

Officially forces Rhule to Redshirt him. For him to go from one read zone read to full read and progressions he needs to sit and study. It worked for Rodgers and Mahomes.  THIS IS A GOOD THING 

Yeah him missing a year worth of practice is a good thing.  Now if we suck this year we have no choice but drafting a qb making him 2 wasted picks

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, stbugs said:

They were also 1st round picks with a poo load more talent. Comparing Corral to Wilson because he was a 3rd round pick or Rodgers and Mahomes because he’ll sit a year is a losing strategy. I was hopeful but honestly, he doesn’t look the part and he’s not likely to make big strides this year. I’m right back on my let’s draft a first round QB this year in what appears to be a solid draft class.

We almost have to draft a QB, especially if Baker flops--which in that case Rhule will be fired. Bring in a new coach who gets his guy, and it's conceivable that Corral ends up in the same boat. He's certainly not going to make any big strides this year. Being drafted by the Panthers might have been the worst thing that could've happened to Corral. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, top dawg said:

We almost have to draft a QB, especially if Baker flops--which in that case Rhule will be fired. Bring in a new coach who gets his guy, and it's conceivable that Corral ends up in the same boat. He's certainly not going to make any big strides this year. Being drafted by the Panthers might have been the worst thing that could've happened to Corral. 

That was probably going to happen anyway if he didn't get injured..

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, top dawg said:

We almost have to draft a QB, especially if Baker flops--which in that case Rhule will be fired. Bring in a new coach who gets his guy, and it's conceivable that Corral ends up in the same boat. He's certainly not going to make any big strides this year. Being drafted by the Panthers might have been the worst thing that could've happened to Corral. 

The problem comes if Baker is not a flop, but not great, ie he is somewhere in between.  Then we have to decide whether we draft another qb (assuming we can get one we want), or resign Mayfield, or something else.  

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...