Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Rhule hate....


tarheelfan23
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

I don't think he's learned jack poo. If/when he keeps PJ Walker and Sam Tecklenburg on the roster again, that'll be all the evidence I need.

I agree that Tecklenburg and Walker should not be in the 53.

Tecklenburg wasn't on the roster in 20 and 21,  he was waived and then PS.  He only got pulled up when Paradis got hurt, played  whole 131 snaps with a 65 pff.   

I would expect PJ ends up on the PS as well.  We only started the season with 2 QB's last year and with Corral on IR, we should only carry 2 this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Panthers Rhule said:

How many Superb Owls is that in total among your 12 examples? 

Belichick, Walsh and Knoll have how many? Wait I need to take off my shoes. All 3 needed more than 2 seasons to even have a winning record. What's your point?

Walsh and Knoll did their thing with no salary cap and a different free agency so it took time to build a team back in the day. The game has changed significantly with adjust FA rules, Salary caps, and overall rule changes. 

Belichick is the true outlier due to the fact he built a dynasty in the Salary Cap era (and the fact he won the super bowl within two years of being the HC of the Pats).

Like was also stated previously, all three you listed had NFL pedigrees and experience coaching at the pro level and gained experience under great coaches themselves.

Rhule was an assistant OL Coach for one season in the NFL and then went to college. His team also got worse from year 1 to year 2.

I want to be wrong. I really do. But I have some serious doubts that Matt Rhule is a good coach my guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, poundaway said:

 

There are some legitimately great HC's on that list that are head and shoulders above Rhule.  Others, meh.   Some of the coaches were on their second stint as HC, others went to the playoffs without beating a single playoff team all season, one went to the playoffs with a losing record the first year.  Some went to the playoffs their first year and haven't  been back.  One went the playoffs because he landed the GOAT who proceed to get him demoted.

Apparently you were expecting playoffs last year.  Sam made sure that wasn't going to happen.

Here's to hope we make the playoffs this year, and you can then put Rhule on a list of coaches that took 3 years.

If your team doesn't show improvement in team record from year 1 to 2, especially with no winning record and no playoffs, then generally speaking historically that coach does not end up as a what some would consider a good coach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, tarheelfan23 said:

This has to stop, the guy can coach. End of story.  He had some struggles to start off his NFL career, but really who doesn't?   This is his 3rd year and time to shine, just watch as he takes off and takes this team to a place we have never been.  In 5 years his name will be up there in the top 5 easy if not the best coach in the NFL.  Buckle up and get ready for a wild fun ride!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

No he can't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

If your team doesn't show improvement in team record from year 1 to 2, especially with no winning record and no playoffs, then generally speaking historically that coach does not end up as a what some would consider a good coach.

I guess. 
For us it doesn't matter what the "generally speaking historically" says.

Tepper has decided Rhule is the coach this year.  He blamed last year on CMC and Horn injuries and gave Rhule a mulligan. 

I want the Panthers to win, so I want Rhule to win.  I also believe that it's possible we can win. 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Saints trade WR Shaheed to Seahawks Seahawks get: WR Rashid Shaheed Saints get: 2026 fourth-round pick, 2026 fifth-round pick Seahawks' grade: A- Saints' grade: B+ One of the NFL's hottest passing teams just got better. The Seahawks currently rank third in EPA per dropback (0.25) and first in success rate on dropbacks (53%). And now they are adding Shaheed in a move that makes sense both on the field and in terms of where the Seahawks are as a franchise. Shaheed, 27, is averaging 1.8 yards per route run this season. But I think that sells him short because that number is down a bit from his career average entering this year (2.0) and he's been playing a role that includes running fewer vertical routes (34%) compared to last year (44%). Shaheed also has consistently posted above-average open scores in ESPN's receiver score metrics, including a 63 this season that ranks 28th among wide receivers. As a complement to Jaxon Smith-Njigba, I expect Shaheed will run downfield more often and be a bigger threat in that role than rookie Tory Horton was. When Cooper Kupp returns, he and Shaheed will make for a nice pair of secondary threats behind one of the best receivers in the league in Smith-Njigba. This is the time to strike for the Seahawks. FPI gives Seattle an 84% chance to make the playoffs and a 5% shot at winning the Super Bowl. This addition helps boost their chances without mortgaging their future the way the Colts did in the Sauce Gardner trade. Shaheed is a pending free agent but given the leverage of the moment for the Seahawks and their need I think they ought to be plenty willing to pay the cost. Shaheed is young enough to where if Seattle doesn't retain him he should sign a free agent contract that would yield Seattle a compensatory pick -- if the Seahawks don't nullify that pick with signings of their own. Because the Seahawks currently have $79 million in cap space next year, per OverTheCap, getting that compensatory pick is not guaranteed. The Saints are not rolling in cap space the way the Seahawks are -- and thus would land a compensatory pick for Shaheed -- but they got more draft capital this way than they otherwise would have. Considering New Orleans' 1-8 record, this should have been an easy decision.
    • I thought victory Mondays was pretty standard 
×
×
  • Create New...