Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tepper reevaluating team partnerships?

PhillyB

By PhillyB,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Panthercougar68 said:

The naming rights contract for the stadium is up at the end of this year I believe. I don’t know when it expires but it’s soon.

I don't know why they even bother with a survey.  It will go to the highest bidder pending it's just not something that the NFL as a whole would be against. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
Just now, PanthersGTI said:

Who cares what corporation pays to put their name on the stadium? You think I'm a big fan of Bank of America?

my criteria is simple.

Is it easy to say and not embarrassing.  Outside of that, I could care less. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Carl Spackler said:

If it existed before 2018, Tepper wants it gone.

I've wondered whether perhaps the fact that the Panthers were a relatively young team without much history or tradition played into his decision to bid on them.

Tepper may have believed that he could basically take the team and reshape it however he wanted and nobody would care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Waldo Grand Master

Waldo

Posted
Posted
32 minutes ago, CRA said:

I don't know why they even bother with a survey.  It will go to the highest bidder pending it's just not something that the NFL as a whole would be against. 

Because it is cheap and easy fan engagement without any real commitment that gets fan data that they can use...if they really give a fug which is debatable at this point. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TD alt
      S Fowler Coker in, Legette out as wr2

      By TD alt · Posted

      Coker has earned his spot---truly earned it.  I still believe that we need to add a more dynamic speedster with high upside to the mix. Then we can really soar, provided we get upgraded QB play...
    • frankw
      S Fowler Coker in, Legette out as wr2

      By frankw · Posted

      Coker has certainly earned it. Good for him.
    • kungfoodude
      Someone's not gonna be happy

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      I don't think we don't call things aggressively, for a Canales offense, anyway. We don't have a QB who makes aggressive throws nor stresses defenses downfield. He is at a career low on 20+ attempts per game and his career 10-20 QB rating is abysmal.  That will always be a limiting factor IF you are looking for a high flying, downfield offense. I am not even that concerned about it, I just want to see effective offense and we decidedly do not possess that. A large chunk of that is Bryce. I think the second biggest chunk is Canales. All the other components(XL included) are fairly minor in comparison to those two things. I am an advocate of attempting to improve at QB. I am not focused on finding "The QB." We failed at that with Bryce. So let's just get better. If that's a one year vet or a draftee or a cheap trade or some combination of any/all, we should do that. We have to get that QB better. Bryce will fail in 2026 and we need to have REALISTIC options to take over when that happens. That ain't Andy Dalton or Hendon Hooker or Jack Plummer or Mike White or....you get the picture. Be serious about hedging that Bryce bet and not just having to make do if he struggles or gets injured.  My mind is definitely made up on Canales. It's year two and he hasn't improved much, nor do I think the bones of a good HC are there. Ron Rivera got to that point after two seasons and he was open about the changes he had to make and advice he got to make that leap in year 3. If we don't see the same after next year, how is he not just Brian Daboll?
×
×
  • Create New...