Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tepper reevaluating team partnerships?

PhillyB

By PhillyB,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

1of10Charnatives Mentor

1of10Charnatives

Posted
Posted

It speaks volumes to me that Tepper is supposedly interested in fan input about the team's corporate partnerships, yet has no interest in hearing our thoughts on issues far more pressing to most fans.

"Yes Mr. Tepper, of course I'm not concerned about the state of the team's on field performance, it's relationship to state and local governments from whom it continues to extort and extract favorable tax exemptions not available to the average citizen or most businesses, your seeming eagerness to pursue acquiring a talented QB embroiled in scandal for appalling personal conduct, or pricing of Nachos at the stadium that implies you're using concession sales to fund a competing bid to colonize Mars. By all means, please ignore those considerations, but pretend you care about my opinion by asking me which giant corporations that spend as much time as you do trying to rip off the public I'd prefer to see associated in a non meaningful way with the team."

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MtnJax Proficient

MtnJax

Posted
Posted
20 hours ago, Adb6368 said:

Lowes and BOA have always made sense considering their local roots… taking that away would be yet another example of Tepper wanting to establish a new legacy and rid the organization of any past relationships. 

Lowes has a league wide sponsor deal with the NFL, so Tepper might end w/e with the Panthers but they’ll still be there

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Clicheking
      Day 2 Targets/Faves

      By Clicheking · Posted

      Give me Anthony Hill Jr or give me death
    • ProcessBlue2
      Mike Kaye predicting we trade up in 2nd round

      By ProcessBlue2 · Posted

      We need a Sam Off Ball Backer to pair with Lloyd. Lloyd is a strong Interior Will especially in Pass Coverage- but that is also Trevin Wallace’s archetype. Need a Rozeboom style run stopper. Rodriguez and Allen fit that
    • woahfraze
      Day 2 Targets/Faves

      By woahfraze · Posted

      There aren’t that many ways to screw Day 2 up.  That’d be them making an obvious reach, or selecting at one of the few positions that we are pretty solid at. Because as excited as we are for the growth and improvement this team is showing, it’s still not an overly talented or deep roster. Honestly, there aren’t really many positions I’d feel bad about. Feelings about Bryce aside (because we are not going to select a QB), it’s really RB (bad positional value) and that’s it. I guess OT too since we grabbed Freeling in Round 1.    While not as high on my wish list as other spots, you can justify WR or TE.     Interior offensive lineman who would likely take over an interior spot either this year (at center) or guard (next for cap casualty of Hunt or Lewis)? Fine by me.   Dlineman? Yes, that’s a highly rotational position and we have zero quality depth.    ILB? Yep, could stand for an upgrade over Wallace.    EDGE? Absolutely wouldn’t hate another option to spell Phillips, Scourton, and Princely.    FS?  Would love to add better coverage skill set to the backend of the defense. Moehrig and Ransom are great in run support but not as good deep. Adding a more traditional FS would allow us to mix and match/run some 3 safety sub packages and or a big nickel type look with a SS down near the line for better run support in possible pass downs.    CB? Could stand to get better at nickel. 
×
×
  • Create New...