Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What is a Successful Season? And is it a regime saving season (If not, what is)?


davos
 Share

What's a successful season?  

62 members have voted

  1. 1. What's a successful season? Sorting this by what would be an improvement over 2021 record.

    • 6-7 wins, no playoffs but team seems improved
      2
    • 8-9 wins, no playoffs, team is noticeably improved (I.E. Baker is promising)
      8
    • 8-9 wins, last wildcard
      24
    • 10+ wins, playoff berth
      20
    • Record schmecord, we need a playoff appearance and playoff win
      8


Recommended Posts

I've seen this topic come up in a few threads and figured to make one of its own as it seems to stir up the most lively debate.

For me:

The BRAND/Process is 10-23, coming off a 7-game losing streak.  I'm at the end of the rope and they simply need to start winning.  Players looking good and going 8-9/9-8 does not cut it.  Winning record & playoffs are a must.  And in addition, the playoff appearance cannot be an embarrassment or blowout.  Time to put up or shut up, not going to be impressed with things simply seeming better and the record only marginally better.

They improved the OL, CMC is back, have a playoff winning QB/best since pre-Watt Cam, and a solid D (fingers crossed on run-D).  There is no excuse to end up 8-9ish with these guys in a wide open NFC.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheCasillas said:

10+ Wins for me but if I get a wild card, I'm

sure at that point in time I’ll have a different mindset. Depends on how bad we lost and how good we won.

Yup, it's kind of why I thought to add that last line.  Record aside, playoffs and no embarrassment in them would be nice, and heck, maybe we get a playoff win.   I just don't see how some would accept just a bit of improvement to some mediocre record and no playoffs ESPECIALLY considering the NFC. 

There's basically TB & LAR.  Green Bay should still be set even without WRs but the rest...

Eagles, Cowboys, Vikings, 49ers, Cards? I feel like this roster can definitely compete with those squads.  Looking at the rosters, we stack up with those teams and not the Falcons, Bears, Commies of the world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, davos said:

Yup, it's kind of why I thought to add that last line.  Record aside, playoffs and no embarrassment in them would be nice, and heck, maybe we get a playoff win.   I just don't see how some would accept just a bit of improvement to some mediocre record and no playoffs ESPECIALLY considering the NFC. 

There's basically TB & LAR.  Green Bay should still be set even without WRs but the rest...

Eagles, Cowboys, Vikings, 49ers, Cards? I feel like this roster can definitely compete with those squads.  Looking at the rosters, we stack up with those teams and not the Falcons, Bears, Commies of the world.

Pending on Hurts… that eagles team could go deep. Fly Eagles or Die

Edited by TheCasillas
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Playoffs and playoff win, don’t care what round or slot, none of that 7-9 one and done bullshit our fans love so much. 
 

You absolutely do NOT let Rhule Have all the power and resources he’s been given to not see this year 3

I hope to god this 7 year talk is some bs

Edited by onmyown
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Making the playoffs

You can clamor for a playoff win all you want but the same people demanding a playoff win also have the Panthers as a 6 win team.

You can't scream we want wins and make the playoffs and be mad that we made the playoffs and not win.

Baby steps....now do we make the playoffs? Thats another discussion.

Edited by Panthercougar68
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't really know to be completely honest because there are so many IF'S that could occur during an entire season in the NFL.

but I do know this...&  that is all that I care about for right now is getting a Win against our next opponent which is the Cleveland Browns & starting the year off 1-0..

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Panthercougar68 said:

Making the playoffs

You can clamor for a playoff win all you want but the same people demanding a playoff win also have the Panthers as a 6 win team.

You can't scream we want wins and make the playoffs and be mad that we made the playoffs and not win.

Baby steps....now do we make the playoffs? Thats another discussion.

Sure you can. It's entirely possible to back into the playoffs and look terrible down the stretch, then getting waxed in the Wild Card. That's not the objective and IMO should still get Rhule axed even though it likely wouldn't.

That said, this sin't a question that can really be definitively answered at this point. I am highly skeptical of Rhule but think it's more about the team actually looking like they're an NFL team. Maybe the team only gets 5-7 wins, but did they actually hang in against quality competition and look like they know what football at the NFl level means? That might be OK. 

They looked pathetic last year. Anything like like that that shows a continued failure to strategize and understand the NFL game, even if they eke out some wins, is not acceptable.

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, KSpan said:

Sure you can. It's entirely possible to back into the playoffs and look terrible down the stretch, then getting waxed in the Wild Card. That's not the objective and IMO should still get Rhule axed even though it likely wouldn't.

That said, this sin't a question that can really be definitively answered at this point. I am highly skeptical of Rhule but think it's more about the team actually looking like they're an NFL team. Maybe the team only gets 5-7 wins, but did they actually hang in against quality competition and look like they know what football at the NFl level means? That might be OK. 

They looked pathetic last year. Anything like like that that shows a continued failure to strategize and understand the NFL game, even if they eke out some wins, is not acceptable.

 

I believe you can't. You want improvement but a playoff berth is an improvement in the black and white sense.

The offense looked pathetic last year. I'm not high on Rhule either but this team is starting to get the markings of a new team as opposed to the "don't care" team of 2019. Players can help bad coaching...see 2021 Cincy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Panthercougar68 said:

I believe you can't. You want improvement but a playoff berth is an improvement in the black and white sense.

The offense looked pathetic last year. I'm not high on Rhule either but this team is starting to get the markings of a new team as opposed to the "don't care" team of 2019. Players can help bad coaching...see 2021 Cincy.

The Bengals had a horrible O-line and schemed around it obviously with the help of Burrow. Also their 2nd half adjustment on D vs the Chiefs was something we've never seen Snow be able to pull off. The lack of adjustments is what kills this college style staff after the first couple scripted drives. Hopefully McAdoo can get the offense going but I also question going from the Joe Brady only 6 plays in the book style to the McAdoo playbook with so many options you can't make up your mind and get everyone on the same page

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Panthercougar68 said:

I believe you can't. You want improvement but a playoff berth is an improvement in the black and white sense.

The offense looked pathetic last year. I'm not high on Rhule either but this team is starting to get the markings of a new team as opposed to the "don't care" team of 2019. Players can help bad coaching...see 2021 Cincy.

As one example 2021 Cincy won the AFCCG thanks to their 'bad coaching' changing up the defensive strategy mid-game, something that we've never seen from this staff.. that's not at all comparable. Getting to the playoffs after stumbling around and playing terrible football, picking into it, may not be likely but it is possible and is exactly why I said what I said. It's about how things happen as much as what happens.

Mediocrity is not the goal and if there aren't signs of fundamental team elevation even if the team ekes out a couple of wins 2020 style, then Rhule can hit the road.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

The Bengals had a horrible O-line and schemed around it obviously with the help of Burrow. Also their 2nd half adjustment on D vs the Chiefs was something we've never seen Snow be able to pull off. The lack of adjustments is what kills this college style staff after the first couple scripted drives. Hopefully McAdoo can get the offense going but I also question going from the Joe Brady only 6 plays in the book style to the McAdoo playbook with so many options you can't make up your mind and get everyone on the same page

I will acknowledge when I say coaching I'm talking about Rhule and hopefully his new hires assist him in improving the team. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, KSpan said:

As one example 2021 Cincy won the AFCCG thanks to their 'bad coaching' changing up the defensive strategy mid-game, something that we've never seen from this staff.. that's not at all comparable. Getting to the playoffs after stumbling around and playing terrible football, picking into it, may not be likely but it is possible and is exactly why I said what I said. It's about how things happen as much as what happens.

Mediocrity is not the goal and if there aren't signs of fundamental team elevation even if the team ekes out a couple of wins 2020 style, then Rhule can hit the road.

Yeah regardless of how well Baker and others play, if we can't make halftime adjustments and manage time outs Rhule and Snow just aren't capable of getting it done. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...