Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Reasons for cautious optimism?


micnificent28
 Share

Recommended Posts

The NFL staff around him,  plus Fitterer , will make this team better.   

Rhule has been a disaster on game day  no need to revisit why I say that…we all know it…we just have to  hope on game day, he listens to his staff.

I know of not one NFL HC that he is better than.

as for optimism, why not.  

Having a serviceable QB makes all things better in the NFL 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rhule is the reason I am not optimistic about this team. I think everything else it set up nicely for this to be a good team, but I've seen nothing that would indicate he knows how to win.

If he gets out of the way and let's his coaches run it, they have a chance, but I don't trust Rhule.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, rayzor said:

Rhule is the reason I am not optimistic about this team. I think everything else it set up nicely for this to be a good team, but I've seen nothing that would indicate he knows how to win.

If he gets out of the way and let's his coaches run it, they have a chance, but I don't trust Rhule.

Definitely want to make it to the playoffs but like you said, Rhule will find a way to fug that scenario up. I want him gone. Can't have it both ways I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Icege said:

There's plenty of reasons to be optimistic or pessimistic; it's just a matter of what you choose to be at this point.

Personally, I prefer to have a good time. Some folks prefer to be miserable. At this point, it's up to you. 🙂

Unfortunately the Panthers constantly disappoining me have made being their fan not much fun anymore. I haven't 100% given up, but these last few year have made it tough and I'm almost at the point I just want to find something else that won't be a constant disappointment. I'm giving them this year....unless they have a deep playoff run or they fire Rhule and replace him with someone who isn't going to have to take 5 years to figure out how to win, I'm probably going to move on.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, rayzor said:

Rhule is the reason I am not optimistic about this team. I think everything else it set up nicely for this to be a good team, but I've seen nothing that would indicate he knows how to win.

If he gets out of the way and let's his coaches run it, they have a chance, but I don't trust Rhule.

If you need your head coach to "get out of the way" in order to be successful, why is he your head coach?

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

If you need your head coach to "get out of the way" in order to be successful, why is he your head coach?

He's supposed to be a good leader. A good leader would do that. A good leader gets people on his team (more speaking about the coaching/leadership team) that can do their job well (hopefully better than you can do their job), give them some direction, and let them do their job. Let them figure out the best way to get it done and you get out of the way and trust the people you've put on your leadership to to get to the destination/goal you were pointing towards.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, rayzor said:

He's supposed to be a good leader. A good leader would do that. A good leader gets people on his team (more speaking about the coaching/leadership team) that can do their job well (hopefully better than you can do their job), give them some direction, and let them do their job. Let them figure out the best way to get it done and you get out of the way and trust the people you've put on your leadership to to get to the destination/goal you were pointing towards.

I get all that, but as an NFL head coach you're still the guy in charge of what happens on gameday.

If you can't contribute something to, for lack of a better term, the process, what is your value?

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Pakmeng said:

I don't think our depth is notably different than most teams. Very few would have notable depth across the board.

I would say overall roster is probably bottom third of the NFL. But we are a bad team that has been rebuilding for three seasons. That's kind of the lot we have for the moment.

The important thing is that it appears to be improved over the roster we fielded in 2020. Now THAT was a bad team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I know it's only been training camp and one preseason game, but I think T-Mac has already shown his floor to be exactly what I said about him in the pre-draft process. That his floor if he never improves his game, is as one of the best #2 WRs in the NFL, if not even still a low end #1 (i.e. a 25th-ish best WR in the league). I think it's safe to say he's already established himself as our #1, and there are only a small handful of teams in the league where I don't think he'd be their starting #2 WR in Week 1. Bengals (Higgins), Dolphins (Waddle), Eagles (Smith), Bucs (Godwin if healthy), Rams (Adams) are really the only teams where I think he'd be the #3 as a rookie in Week 1.  A few others like the Lions (Williams), Bears (Odunze), Seahawks (Kupp), Commanders (Deebo), where he'd be the 2b to start the season, just because they're vets and/or already have a year or two of experience with their team/QB. And even having said that, I think by year 2, he's better than every one of those players (And no, I'm not saying he's already going to be better than a prime version of Adams, just whatever he'll be at 33 next year), and same goes for Kupp, but that's more because it seems like his body might be quitting on him in a way that hasn't happened to Adams (yet).
    • Well to be fair, Horn not practicing right now to let his stitches heal up from a car accident isn't something that should be concerning.  Sure, you don't want him missing practice leading into the season, but it's one that once healed, won't have lingering affects or fear of re-injuring it, it was just bad luck.
    • Quality backups are absolutely important. This franchise has been plagued with depth problems. That said, there is a little bit of dismay that Mays can't beat out a 1-legged man, and all the talk going into the off-season was how BC would certainly be gone since he had position versatility.  In the end, it doesn't matter too awfully much, as I would be shocked to no end if Corbett makes it through the season. We know what we have in reserve, and that should surely be better than trying to sign random fat guys mid season to try and take over.
×
×
  • Create New...