Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Rhule disappointed, not discouraged by opening loss


WarPanthers89
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Vox said:

Question. Does anyone know the best coach Matt Rhule has "beaten"? This clown was 0-7 against coaches fired last year. It's absolutely embarassing.

Looking over his 10 wins, I'd say its either Sean Payton when the Saints had a lot of people out, or Ron Rivera near the end of 2020 that messed up our draft position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, trueblade said:

This is Sean McVay after getting killed by the Bills:

Nathaniel Hackett after losing to Seattle:

Notice what's different about them and what Matt Rhule says?

rivera never did this either..at least not until near the end but you know it was forced. and rivera was pretty much fox 2.0

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Looking over his 10 wins, I'd say its either Sean Payton when the Saints had a lot of people out, or Ron Rivera near the end of 2020 that messed up our draft position.

So the COVID ravaged Saints with multiple players and coaches out and Ron Rivera who was starting Dwayne Haskins. I just don't have any faith in this dude. Even if he manages to get us to the playoffs given a miracle who actually think he will be able to outcoach playoff caliber teams and coaches?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

McVay knows what he's doing.  But there's nothing that Hackett could say after last night's display that would make me feel better about him.

That kind of game management is enough to make you sick to your stomach if you're a Broncos fan.

Hackett flubbed up the end game for sure, but I mostly chalk that up to a learning experience for a rookie HC. I just like that he took responsibility for his teams failures. I can't remember ever hearing our coach do that.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, trueblade said:

Hackett flubbed up the end game for sure, but I mostly chalk that up to a learning experience for a rookie HC. I just like that he took responsibility for his teams failures. I can't remember ever hearing our coach do that.

I'm overreacting for sure (I mean what else is there to do after week 1?).  But he gives me vibes of a guy that's in over his head.

I'll listen to "missed opportunities" or "it is what it is" every week if we're winning.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, trueblade said:

It's possible, but I was a big believer in Hackett. I wanted him if we got rid of Rhule, so I'm more than willing to give him more time so I can feel better about my evaluation of him.

Just about every coach I've wanted the Panthers to hire has turned out to be a huge dud.  For me, this goes back to Steve Spurrier taking the Washington job, and us getting stuck with John Fox.  Turned out a lot better for us.

It's like QBs.  You just never know until they get out there and show what they can do.  It's like a roll of the dice.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Vox said:

So the COVID ravaged Saints with multiple players and coaches out and Ron Rivera who was starting Dwayne Haskins. I just don't have any faith in this dude. Even if he manages to get us to the playoffs given a miracle who actually think he will be able to outcoach playoff caliber teams and coaches?

He has beaten Kliff Kingsbury twice - Kingsbury is in the same boat as Ruhle. Destined to be back in college by Thanksgiving. Another guy who shoulda stayed in his lane. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

He has beaten Kliff Kingsbury twice - Kingsbury is in the same boat as Ruhle. Destined to be back in college by Thanksgiving. Another guy who shoulda stayed in his lane. 

Didn't he just get an extension though?

(the Bidwills aren't exactly the sharpest knives in the drawer either)

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...