Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Person says the Panthers will win this one


ladypanther
 Share

Recommended Posts

I think the assumption we get to Jones is more hope than anything. Our pass rush last week was atrocious so it's hard for me to believe it exist until I see it. Daboll is too damn smart to not run it down Snow's throat. The O needs to set a realistic pace by running the ball early and get Baker in a much better situation than last week by working him into the game. Run then some playaction and then open it up if things are going smoothly. Keep it simple and balanced. 

Either team could just lay an egg in this one but I am guessing it will be a scrappy game from both teams. 

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CRA said:

coin flip game.  the less stupid team wins the game. 

 

Same as week 1.

Last week it seemed both teams should be run heavy and whichever team that stopped running first would lose. I didn't have much faith in either team being smart.

Neither team was. Both teams seemed to come out pass heavy and overall the Browns were 1-1 passing and running though and the Panthers passed 3 times for every run. Panthers were more stupid.

I have no idea what the Giants defensive strength is so I don't know the smart game plan this week

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

No excuses now, we have to win.  Thats a lot of defense that is going to be out for them

Yeah their secondary is Xavier Mckinney at safety and then a bunch of back ups. ILB's are whatever, 3-4 interior guys will get pressure on our IOL but otherwise no reason we can't get CMC/Baker moving around in the backfield. Winks scheme is designed for man coverage and they don't have the secondary guys to do it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Thomas31873 said:

Same as week 1.

Last week it seemed both teams should be run heavy and whichever team that stopped running first would lose. I didn't have much faith in either team being smart.

Neither team was. Both teams seemed to come out pass heavy and overall the Browns were 1-1 passing and running though and the Panthers passed 3 times for every run. Panthers were more stupid.

I have no idea what the Giants defensive strength is so I don't know the smart game plan this week

 

yep.  

I know the Giants will run the football though.  New coach seems smart enough that we are getting a full dose of Barkley. 

Who knows what the Panther O will attempt to be. 

Got know clue what either D will attempt to do. 

Matt Rhule's teams IMO tend to do something dumb and almost go overkill the other direction sometimes so that's something to watch.    

 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Thomas31873 said:

Same as week 1.

Last week it seemed both teams should be run heavy and whichever team that stopped running first would lose. I didn't have much faith in either team being smart.

Neither team was. Both teams seemed to come out pass heavy and overall the Browns were 1-1 passing and running though and the Panthers passed 3 times for every run. Panthers were more stupid.

I have no idea what the Giants defensive strength is so I don't know the smart game plan this week

 

They stuffed Derrick Henry up the middle all game long for a total of 83 yards. It's a new 3-4ish scheme and only the DT's and ILB's are pretty good. CMC has to get to the edge or leak through for some YAC check downs. WR's should be open all day if Baker has time

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

No excuses now, we have to win.  Thats a lot of defense that is going to be out for them

I think last year the Giants entire offense was hurt or something like that.   There is no game I feel confident in at this stage. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Coreyl90 said:

I don't think we'll see Saquon run wild. I think last week was a fluke and they'll tighten up going forward

Based on what? No new personnel, same DC that we've seen get gashed by the run for years now... signs do not point to such a conclusion.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • if  ANYONE actually goes & looks at the FACTS on rookie Qb's after 2 full seasons as a starter in the NFL & they are still well below average do they rarely ever actually become top tier Qb's & instead most likely either do not recieve a second contract & or become life long backups...just saying 
    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
×
×
  • Create New...