Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Other games


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Jackie Lee said:

There has to be a way. They make too much money not to have the technology for at least some kind of sensors on the goal lines

Agreed.  If they can put those sensors in the shoulder pads, there's gotta be a way to work it in the ball and goal line without affecting play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MillionDollarCam said:

Honestly, not impressed with Eberflus… something about the name Matt just doesn’t sit right with me… Rhule, Nagy, Patricia, Eberflus… LaFleur is the lone outlier.

I think all things considered…. With a roster bereft of talent… going against a Hall of Fame QB with a chunk of elite talent on defense.. Eberflus is doing about as good as you can expect. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Varking said:

I think all things considered…. With a roster bereft of talent… going against a Hall of Fame QB with a chunk of elite talent on defense.. Eberflus is doing about as good as you can expect. 

I just think a lot of his play calls have been obvious and predictable. A lot of run, run, pass, series’. I also think he went away from what got the Bears down to the goal line to begin with (Montgomery).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MillionDollarCam said:

Guess the MLB doesn’t want Angel Hernandez fuging up any more games.

Especially with legal betting everywhere nowadays, gotta take the game out of the part time refs hands as much as possible. I read a crazy article last week about good coaches studying refs school preferences, athletic ability etc. Like that Dallas game last year where Dak scrambled and the ref didn't get to the line of scrimmage fast enough for Dak to spike the ball. It's a game inside the game currently

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just because all draft picks are a gamble doesn't mean you don't have a better chance at hitting on a better player the higher you're drafting. It would literally be like someone saying, I'll give you 1 or 2 free spins on a slot machine, and you say you'll take the 1 because you're not likely to win anything anyways with 1 or 2, so why bother? The Cowboys desperately wanted T-Mac, but because they were 4 picks behind us, they weren't able to get him.  If you told Cowboys fans that had they lost 2 more games last year in a lost season, that it would get them the player they wanted so badly, would they in retrospect go back and lose those games to get their guy? 95% of them would take that trade off in a heartbeat, and the others who wouldn't are the fans who would rather enjoy an extra win or two in a poo season to then set themselves up to be better for the next decade. I also think the fans who argue against this thinking, get too caught up in the "well that means you're going to be rooting against us late in the season even if we still have a shot at the playoffs." Which isn't true, it's saying if you're telling me right now we'd make the playoffs but lose in the first round, that I'd rather end up 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss the playoffs because in our opinion, the benefits that come along with that outweigh the benefit of the players getting 1 game of playoff experience.
    • In relation to tanking. I think you can count on one hand the number of people here who actually want us to lose football games. When accounting for it across the fanbase it amounts to maybe 2% of the entire Panthers fanbase. But you engage with some internet trolls and think haters are coming out of the woodwork and hey look at that it's all a conspiracy that leads to Bryce Young haters. Do you hear yourself sir? If it sounds ridiculous that's because it is. I mean at this point do you see Bryce haters in your dreams? As far as the culture of this franchise goes we seem to be doing better in that department via what we are building right now and with the people we have in place. But we also shouldn't just make assumptions just yet either. The rubber still needs to meet the road. And going back to previous seasons I think we can acknowledge although tanking obviously isn't a thing there were some times where we thought our culture was improving but really it wasn't. Yes I'm looking directly at some of those wins under Wilks. If the culture had truly changed we would not have lost to the Steelers who have been mediocre for years at home the way we did and they were starting Mitch Trubisky ffs. We did not change our culture for the better and we won games that ultimately meant nothing. It was just a brief mirage. We've done this for years now. The harsh truth of the matter is the Panthers have not had a winning season or been to the playoffs in going on 8 years but in those years they've been trying to convince themselves they aren't poo but in the process all they've done throughout most of that time period is squander better draft position and we were still the worst team in the league for our troubles. At the end of the day we should be able to just be adults and reconcile with that. And no that isn't being "pro tank" or any other boogeyman term it's simply recognizing reality.
    • He's an asset in a game manager role. But as soon as you have to ask him to go out there and try to make plays and not just take what the defense is giving him... well, Darnolding happens.
×
×
  • Create New...