Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

McAdoo Predictable

ncfan

By ncfan,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

lightsout Grand Master

lightsout

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Well, I certainly hope we spent some time installing some different plays this week because it's frigging Thursday evening and we've got a game on Sunday.

I question whether we can install a bunch of new stuff in just the next two practices.

 

McAdoo and our players can easily. I've seen high school teams install two formations with a few plays in each in 3 days time. Surely pros can get a new formation with some new plays installed in a weeks time. question is if Rhule deems it necessary or if "we don't need to change anything".

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jackie Lee Grand Master

Jackie Lee

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

I'll add that in 17' Wilks did run Ron's zone he also blitzed at the highest rate in panthers history... Don't confuse him with Eric Washington the season after.

RIght. We also had good linebackers then. It's weird to take the front half of Snows D and play Wilk's zone in the back. Doesn't seem like much of a philosophy, just trying random stuff out hoping something works

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TrevorLaurenceTime22 Grand Master

TrevorLaurenceTime22

Posted
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

RIght. We also had good linebackers then. It's weird to take the front half of Snows D and play Wilk's zone in the back. Doesn't seem like much of a philosophy, just trying random stuff out hoping something works

It's kinda backasswards tbh our secondary is much better now than it was then and if we are being honest the dline is kind of a push... (37 year old peppers was the only pass rush threat) no secondary can hold up in a soft zone vs the kind of time we are allowing with these dumb 3 man rushs.

Edited by TrevorLaurenceTime22
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jackie Lee Grand Master

Jackie Lee

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

It's kinda backasswards tbh our secondary is much better now than it was then and if we are being honest the dline is kind of a push... (37 year old peppers was the only pass rush threat) no secondary can hold up in a soft zone vs the kind of time we are allowing with these dumb 3 man rushs.

Yeah and half the time we do blitz they send Jaycee LOL

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
3838 Mentor

3838

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

@Jackie Lee We are seriously at the point I think the huddle could do a better job than the current staff (and that's saying somthing considering its at the height of flip out mode)

I'd certainly would agree with you if George Seferit was still here. All he knew was bubble screens and 5 yard slants.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jackie Lee Grand Master

Jackie Lee

Posted
Posted
56 minutes ago, Snake said:

Firing Joe Brady might have saved Rhules job for a year but McAdoo is going to get him fired this year. Talk about a terrible scheme. 

Plus the fact there was zero strategy behind the hire. Just the only guy he could convince to take the job and hoped for the best. What a brand

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TD alt
      Chad Reuter of NFL.com 4-round mock draft

      By TD alt · Posted

      Also, you don't really get good value by drafting a center in the first.
    • TD alt
      Chad Reuter of NFL.com 4-round mock draft

      By TD alt · Posted

      First off, we haven't been ignoring the defense. We have drafted several defensive players, but, perhaps more importantly, we have added good pieces in free agency. Secondly, the offense was still kinda bad (27th or so depending where you look at). You can't just say we can't pick an offensive guy while acknowledging that the offense wasn't good. Everything is on the table. Like I said above, it seems kind of counterproductive to say that we shouldn't draft an offensive player high unless they're at certain positions. The offense was mediocre at best. Sure, we had an uncanny knack to win some close games at opportune times, but the offense wasn't really good. To me, it makes little sense to put limitations on who/what we should draft when we need an upgrade at so many positions. What you look at is trying to get the best value--bang for your buck so to speak--and that's the way it should be. D-Mo has used FA to set up the draft in order not to be pigeonholed into anything, and that's the way that it should be.
    • LinvilleGorge
      College Basketball 2025

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Hubert has plenty of money. I don't hate the guy. I think he a legit good guy. This is Ron Rivera all over again for me. It's just very obvious a coaching change is needed and it audka we gottaboart ways with a good guy and I'd much rather it work out but the same issues appearing again and again year after year are clearly shouting what needs to happen. With that said, if we hire Todd Golden, that's it. I'm out. I'd greatly prefer to just keep getting disappointed by Hubert. I can at least stand to root for that.
×
×
  • Create New...