Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PFF grades from Panthers' Week 4 loss to Cardinals


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

31 minutes ago, rmoneyg35 said:

I’m sorry but I don’t think Elfein is as good as the PFF scores show. He’s constantly getting beat and is on the ground. I would love to see how good Bozeman is

Listen to Mike Lombardi about PFF grades. I put extremely little stock into them as nobody over there knows football. They had Nick Bosa ranked extremely low last week I believe. Listen to Mike Lombardi’s GM shuffle pod from 9.25 for that one. 
Since the Panthers are “analytically” entrenched now - I bet they use those as the gospel. Rhule will probably start quoting them soon. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

Boy the people calling for Erving sure do have short memories. Please go put on some 2021 tape and then tell me if you feel the same way.

Brother look around, its dire times........this is just like the Baker or Darnold deal. I got around 50+ post dumping on Erv, hated the move since it was signed. Motons 2022 is on par with Ervs 2021, deal is that was at LT and new OL coach may have improve him some. Plus I do not care if its Bozeman, Mays, Erv, or even a PS call up like Brown......just need better RT play. Overall the OL has been good enough, weird that the weak point is Moton. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Basbear said:

Brother look around, its dire times........this is just like the Baker or Darnold deal. I got around 50+ post dumping on Erv, hated the move since it was signed. Motons 2022 is on par with Ervs 2021, deal is that was at LT and new OL coach may have improve him some. Plus I do not care if its Bozeman, Mays, Erv, or even a PS call up like Brown......just need better RT play. Overall the OL has been good enough, weird that the weak point is Moton. 

Probably because he is banged up. Erving is a disaster. There is no comparison.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Probably because he is banged up. Erving is a disaster. There is no comparison.

Park it then, take 4 week IR trip and strength whatever knee/back/calf/ankle......cause Motons play is Erv bad.

Edited by Basbear
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Yeah, no. I know you like Erving for some reason but that dude is one of the worst OL we have seen in the last decade.

bro you got me mixed up, I hated when they announced the signing. Only thing I liked about him was hes a great backup to carry on gamedays since he can play all 5......bad but still. Check out any of threads when he signed and most of the ones where he was the main topic. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Yeah, no. I know you like Erving for some reason but that dude is one of the worst OL we have seen in the last decade.

Erving was bad but I mean the dude wasn't even the worst OL on our team last year lol.  John Miller and Michael Jordan were considerably worse IMO...*shudders*.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Basbear said:

@kungfoodude I mainly used Erv, but the search doesnt like that. But I still got a few Erving ones

 

 

Got some more hateful comments I know, but the search machine doesnt list any with "Erv". hmmm

I am just saying you have mentioned before you like him as a utility backup. I don't. He's terrible wherever he plays. 

We fundamentally disagree on that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Some of you act like one can't learn from experience over time. Just because you may not know what you're doing in 2018 doesn't mean that you don't know what you're doing in 2025. Frankly, you grow from experience, and success and excellence gives first-time applicants the hand probably 99.999% of the time.
    • It's an interesting topic of conversation as sports evolves. I think ultimately it would lead to a number of small market franchises folding though. Especially in the NBA where there are so many bad teams that have been bad for years and years in some cases already. But as it stands I think athlete pay draft or no draft aside has reached a point where we can and should realistically ask should they make that much compared to the average person. Now college athletes is a different conversation but even that reaches a breaking point. But we could go down the rabbit hole on this even further into overall entertainment and talk about actors making absurd sums too. In the end I think in sports the powers that be won't allow these changes to even be considered because it opens the door for so many other variables. But who knows how long sports like football will realistically be around after people like us pass on. We're only just now learning about things like CTE which the league and the sport in general will only be able to run away from for so long. As far as the NBA goes my understanding is viewership has been steadily going down for a number of reasons but one crucial aspect is key players missing so many games. The NBA has to figure that out regardless. Especially when considering fans who pay to see these athletes compete in person. But hey I guess let's just try to appreciate what we've got while it still exists in this form eh?
    • I can't see a world where the money goes down, but maybe your lottery odds are now your contract numbers you can offer.  Thunder? You can offer Flagg 4 years, 20 million.  Hornets? You can offer Flagg 4 years, 80 million.  Some form of a system where the money is still there, but so is the freedom of choice (on top of bad teams getting *some* competitive advantage to signing them). 
×
×
  • Create New...