Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Interesting info about Wilks at Arizona


ladypanther
 Share

Recommended Posts

Others may already know this...I did not.

Quote

The Cardinals went with Josh Rosen at No. 10, instead of selecting Lamar Jackson or trading up for Josh Allen, who was Wilks’ preference.

Read more at: https://www.charlotteobserver.com/sports/nfl/carolina-panthers/article267273002.html#storylink=cpy

He was definitely right about the QB's.  Too bad he had to pay the price for the GM's bad decision.

  • Pie 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ladypanther said:

Others may already know this...I did not.

Read more at: https://www.charlotteobserver.com/sports/nfl/carolina-panthers/article267273002.html#storylink=cpy

He was definitely right about the QB's.  Too bad he had to pay the price for the GM's bad decision.

But it was his fault Rosen sucked. 

 

 

NOT

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wilks wasn't even allowed to pick most of his staff in Arizona, nor given any power to make personnel decisions. No idea if he's a good head coach or not (especially considering he was just an average coordinator here), but that year in Arizona was such a terrible situation that I don't think that should really be used against him

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CamTheMan said:

Wilks wasn't even allowed to pick most of his staff in Arizona, nor given any power to make personnel decisions. No idea if he's a good head coach or not (especially considering he was just an average coordinator here), but that year in Arizona was such a terrible situation that I don't think that should really be used against him

Holcomb (DC), McCoy (OC) and Jeff Rodgers(ST) all spent time with Wilks on the Panthers, but he didn't select any of them?  He hated his staff so much he elevated Holcomb again here?

I call BS.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure I buy it. Of course a coach is going to claim he didn't want the bust and actually wanted one of the guys who turned out really good.

Also, criticizing teams for not trading up to get a guy isn't necessarily a legit criticism. Who's to say trading up was even an option? The Bills may not have been willing to come off that pick or at least not without an absolutely absurd asking price.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Pretty sure those things wouldn't be difficult to verify.

For one, it's not like he had the kind of power in Arizona that Rhule had here.

Its in the lawsuit but I am not sure how you can verify it.    To be honest it seems kindof petty to include.  Who were they going to trade with?  What were they going to offer etc?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Pretty sure those things wouldn't be difficult to verify.

For one, it's not like he had the kind of power in Arizona that Rhule had here.

How would you verify it? Of course anyone a part of that dumpster fire will claim that yes, Wilks wanted Allen or Lamar and so did I!

McAdoo will undoubtedly claim that he wanted nothing to do with Baker and was actually lobbying for something entirely different.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

How would you verify it? Of course anyone a part of that dumpster fire will claim that yes, Wilks wanted Allen or Lamar and so did I!

McAdoo will undoubtedly claim that he wanted nothing to do with Baker and was actually lobbying for something entirely different.

Is anybody refuting it though?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Is anybody refuting it though?

Why would they? What's to gain for them?

Honestly if I was in that organization at the time and was asked about it I would just say there were divided opinions within the organization and I can't really recall who was saying what. Lots of things get said in the discussions leading up to every draft. How am I supposed to recall specific positions held by people years ago? I got my own poo to deal with.

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

Is anybody refuting it though?

Its in the lawsuit so I doubt they are in the business of airing the dirty laundry just yet.  It will come out one way or the other.  But as LG stats, hell anyone can claim anything about who they wanted.   Its petty and quite childish to put that out there. 

 

This says they looked into it but too expensive.

 

https://raisingzona.com/2021/01/13/arizona-cardinals-acquired-wrong-passer-2018-draft/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • What's wrong with Damien Lewis? He played pretty well last year.
    • Official NFL Cuts Tracker Deadline for roster cuts is Tuesday, August 26th. At this moment (Friday, August 22nd) the only interesting names I see are... K Caden Davis (BUF) RB Ameer Abdullah (SF) WR Equanimeous St. Brown (SF) WR Donovan Peoples-Jones (NO) LB Khaleke Hudson (TEN) Abdullah, St. Brown, Peoples-Jones I don't exactly think we should cut anybody for but it was just interesting seeing those names. Khaleke Hudson was on the Panthers' practice squad last year I believe and might have even gotten called up? And of course, Caden Davis just because of the question mark at kicker this season for the team.
    • I'll say 6/10. I don't know that we learned a whole lot about this team during preseason that we didn't already know. We didn't play the starters enough to really get a feel for what to expect. We had one good drive against the Browns, one 3-and-out and two 3-and-outs against the Texans. That's an extremely small sample size across 3 games regardless of performance. My camp/preseason takeaways: Jalen Coker might be the best WR on this team and is certainly no worse than #2. Nic Scourton is going to be a good player for us. Possibly very good. Bobby Brown was our best free agent addition. Jack Plummer isn't an NFL QB. Not even a practice squad guy. Having anyone other than Canales and Evero call plays was a really stupid and pointless idea. Our depth is largely non-existent, especially on defense. The three areas we actually DO have depth are on the OL, in the WR corp. and at RB. I can't fathom why Dan Morgan didn't do more to upgrade ILB during the offseason. We better hope Lathan Ransom steps up at FS because if he doesn't we have a massive hole. For all the hype surrounding Sanders/Evans, Tommy Tremble is still the best TE on the roster. I'm only slightly less enthusiastic going into the regular season than I was a month ago. I think our starters on offense are solid and we should be pretty good there unless Bryce totally regresses. On defense, we're probably bottom 3rd in the league if 100% healthy and significantly worse than that if injuries become an issue. We badly need at least two of our rookies to become high-level players early (ideally one of the pass rushers + Ransom) and at least 2 of our free agent additions (ideally Moehrig + Bobby Brown) to be significant upgrades over last year. Call me pessimistically optimistic 😆
×
×
  • Create New...