Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

"Fire Sale" not happening


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

No team in their right mind would give a single first for CMC. The production isn't there this year because of the offensive woes and wasn't there the last couple years because of season ending injures.

The production isn't there this year? I mean he's on pace for 1,900 total yards playing in one of the worst offenses we've seen in years.

Edited by UNCrules2187
  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I agree but if you know its a later pick, and you know you are keeping him from another team and if you know he super charges an already super charged offense and he fits in your timeline for winning.  I can see a super bowl starved team doing it

There are other RBs out there with similar skillsets that while not as good, could probably be had for less.

We'll just have to agree to disagree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  

8 minutes ago, therealmjl said:

Cam Erving

hahahahahaa

 

5 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Hey, we got returns for Greg Little and Dennis Daley.

 

I actually think Cam Erving is a decent candidate to get dealt. Lots of tackle injuries out there, I can definitely see a team like the Broncos or Rams sending a 5th or 6th round pick for him.

Edited by UNCrules2187
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

Minnesota?  they are 5-1. Add CMC with Cook and Jefferson.  That would be nasty. 

Ask yourself this.  If your were a bills fan would you be banging the table for the team to send a first to get cmac? 

 

My answer:  hell fug yes I would. I think that is what we probably see in the next couple weeks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

No team in their right mind would give a single first for CMC. The production isn't there this year because of the offensive woes and wasn't there the last couple years because of season ending injures.

McCaffrey is 4th in the NFL in yards from scrimmage, only behind Saquon, Tyreek Hill and Nick Chubb. That's with him operating within the worst offense in the NFL. I hardly think people will look at that and scoff at the lack of production

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are going to draft a rookie QB next year. 

CMC is THE BEST player to pair with a developing QB. On top of that his dead cap is nasty. 

 

Honestly our best player to trade for the biggest return is Burns. Which would make sense as we need to redo his contract this offseason.

 

That said, my head is still in the sand... I still think we are a coach and a half decent QB away from being able to compete. LFG!!!

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, UNCrules2187 said:

The production isn't here this year? I mean he's on pace for 1,900 total yards playing in one of the worst offenses we've seen in years.

"On pace" doesn't matter since injures, changes to the scheme, etc can change that.

There are a dozen guys with more production running and one of them is a QB. Some of them have less attempts with more yards. He's done better catching the ball than other RBs, but that's because he's been used more that way than most other RBs.

So yeah, I would say the production is not there to warrant a first or more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CanadianCat said:

We are going to draft a rookie QB next year. 

CMC is THE BEST player to pair with a developing QB. On top of that his dead cap is nasty. 

 

Honestly our best player to trade for the biggest return is Burns. Which would make sense as we need to redo his contract this offseason.

 

That said, my head is still in the sand... I still think we are a coach and a half decent QB away from being able to compete. LFG!!!

So cmc is going to be cool just hanging around a poo team just to make it easier on our rookie qb?  We are 2 years minimum best case scenario for playoffs.  Lets do the right thing and send him to a winner now and get a pick or 2 for him.  By the time we make the playoffs you really think he is going to be productive?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

"On pace" doesn't matter since injures, changes to the scheme, etc can change that.

There are a dozen guys with more production running and one of them is a QB. Some of them have less attempts with more yards. He's done better catching the ball than other RBs, but that's because he's been used more that way than most other RBs.

So yeah, I would say the production is not there to warrant a first or more.

You say he's done better catching the ball because he's "used more that way" but conveniently leave out that "of the dozen guys with more production running" 8 of those 12 have more carries than he does. Feels like you're cherry picking stats to support your point. You didn't care to respond to the earlier post showing he's 4th in total scrimmage yards so far this year either.

Edited by UNCrules2187
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

So cmc is going to be cool just hanging around a poo team just to make it easier on our rookie qb?  We are 2 years minimum best case scenario for playoffs.  Lets do the right thing and send him to a winner now and get a pick or 2 for him.  By the time we make the playoffs you really think he is going to be productive?

Well considering he's only 26 years old and barely has any wear on him for the past two years, yeah I think he will be productive when we're back in the playoffs. As teams like the Giants and Dolphins are showing, all you need is the right combination of coaching staff and decent QB play to be one year away from playoff contention.  

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

Doubt it. Giving up first round picks for oft injured guys is a Panther move, not a move done by well run teams.

The Chiefs used their 2020 1st round pick on Clyde Edwards-Helaire. You think that's a smarter move than even a 1 year rental on McCaffrey for close to league minimum salary? They would easily be the super bowl favorite. Honestly it's a down year for the NFL as a whole and Kansas City and Buffalo seem like the only 2 teams with any legit shot at the Super Bowl. You can give up pick 32 for McCaffrey and nearly guarantee your super bowl win, or you can sit on your thumbs, hope for the best and try to draft another Clyde Edwards-Helaire with that precious pick you were just too damn smart to give up.

I don't doubt for one second that KC and Buffalo would happily get on the phone with Fitterer if their 1st round pick was enough for the Panthers. I just think the team is genuine that it's not and I don't blame them. The last pick of the 1st round is not going to help a rookie qb and the team as a whole more than McCaffrey will. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

We are 2 years minimum best case scenario for playoffs.

Do not agree with this at all.  (I can't believe I am saying this) We have a good offensive line, CMC and some decent WRs.  We have a top 10 defense, if they weren't on the field so much. 

You bring in a good HC with an innovated offense, a QB that at minimum, can manage the offense.  A defensive coordinator that can utilize the good players we have.  It's not impossible to turn this around in one off-season.   

A prime example is the NY Giants. Brian Daboll has this team playing great football.  They are fighting to the end and are winning.  Last year they were as bad as we were.  This year they are in the position to get a wildcard and depending on how the remainder of the season goes.  They could win their division. 

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That was a good segment. Watched every minute of it and would highly recommend it to all fans.
    • "So much of what the Panthers are going to do next week isn't dictated by their preference, but by what happens above them. That's another benefit of not getting locked into need. For instance, if you're thinking you want a receiver, seeing five or six of them go off the board and reacting by taking the sixth or seventh off your list instead of the first (or second or third) something else isn't necessarily wise." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-back-into-the-weeds-of-the-nfl-draft-bryce-young-charlotte-hornets-mock-draft This is what some don't seem to get, I don't care how many times it is said: You're NOT going to draft an inferior person at one position, just because that position is perceived as, or is in fact, a bigger need. That would basically nullify, or at least lessen, the reason why you set yourself up via free agency to be able to take the BPA/BAP on the board in the first place.  Yes, the process is complex, very much involved and ongoing, but the overall philosophy is not rocket science. You set yourself up in order not to be pigeonholed into taking a lower graded player at the expense of a higher graded one. This is why Morgan, Gantt and countless of others say the same thing. This is why it's just nonsensical to set yourself in a position where you don't have to, but then act like you have to come hell or high water: "Oh, we have to draft [whatever position], and we can't draft [this position]."  I'm good with whatever they do, until proven otherwise, but even then, you have to be mature enough to know that drafting is an imperfect exercise, filled with hits and misses. And, you generally don't know if you've hit, and especially missed, right away. Moreover, like I've said before, sometimes two players--different positions or not--can both be hits on their respective teams, so in that sense, it's not purely about a right or wrong pick as much as it's about putting puzzle pieces together at the time the best way that you know how.  At the end of the day, people are going to believe what they want to believe, but one thing that's true is that what the Panthers do regarding the draft is dependent upon what others do, and what others do can and does change things. That being the case, it's just another reason why you can't go in with tunnel vision. The thought of doing that is preposterous.
    • He is a talented player with a lot of potential but ultimately he is a legend in his own mind and the minds of those who attack on his behalf when people pinpoint inconvenient truths. I could see people being so hostile over him if he actually had that kind of juice but he doesn't. Even in the Heat win LaMelo took 31 shots and was 40%. If not for Coby White's late heroics we would have lost in regulation. The reality is we do have pieces in place to compete in the playoffs but in year 6 and with a supermax and a salary that is only going to increase over the next few years LaMelo Ball simply does not look like a franchise centerpiece that you can go on multiple playoff runs with. Look at someone like Trae Young. His team moved on. And he actually took them to the conference finals. The Hornets are at a crossroads. Very tough conversations need to be had in the offseason.
×
×
  • Create New...