Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Burns is probably going to be traded right?


firefox1234
 Share

Recommended Posts

no

And even if he did he wouldn't go for a first. He's got 1 year of a contract left and hes not gonna change a defense hard enough to warrant it, even by analytics standards too.

we got a 2nd, 3rd and 4th for a HB everyone knew we were trading on a bad contract from a bad offense and now everyone acts like we're in burn it to the ground mode.

Edited by Rags
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Rags said:

no

And even if he did he wouldn't go for a first. He's got 1 year of a contract left and hes not gonna change a defense hard enough to warrant it, even by analytics standards too.

we got a 2nd, 3rd and 4th for a HB everyone knew we were trading on a bad contract from a bad offense and now everyone acts like we're in burn it to the ground mode.

Unless we go ham to resign Burns why stay when free agency would be his best career path?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, firefox1234 said:

To what end? So we can trade him for chump change?

He could get injured and miss the rest of the season, and someone would still give up a first rounder for him in the offseason if we tag him.

He's a 24 year old elite pass rusher, he could be that for another 8-10 years.

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t think we want to ship him but I doubt he wants to stay here. So we’ll see how that shakes out. 

Would hate to tag him or have him just sign elsewhere and we gets comps.

If he refuses an extension, we may need to if we want any sort of gain from him leaving.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am gonna believe it wasn’t us if the 4th round pick price is accurate. We needed 225 points to get from 19 to their pick. 875 at 19 to 1100 at 14.  Our 2026 4th was valued at 56 points I think. A future 4th has less value. So that wasn’t close to enough.    It would have taken our third and our fourth. Comes within a point of even.    Now, moving to their spot in the second round we could have done but after Miami took Rodriguez why would we? 
    • Yep,and Blake Miller have had more experiences than Freeling,Lions did not sigh a vet T like Walker,so they had to pick Miller.
    • I mean it's expected.  This is the NBA.  And they hate the Charlotte Hornets.  Flagg was also the guy "magically" given to the Mavs who lost Luca to the wildly popular Lakers.  Was always an uphill battle.  But the award is BS since it's not voted on before play-in starts. Kon probably lost because of the play-in as many people switched votes.  It was a regular season award, so this is some nonsense.  Kon also didn't have the luxury of taking 10 games off to rest up injuries like Flagg did.  If he did, he wouldn't have been nursing his back the last month.  I mean, screw him for being on an actual playoff team that matters.  Flagg took tons of shots a game, he was wildly inefficient.  Kon was a huge reason the Hornets made the play-in and turned the season around after Jan.   I think Flagg will probably be the better player long term, or at least the most impact.  But Kon should have won ROTY.
×
×
  • Create New...