Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Scott Fitterer


Panthering
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Khaki Lackey said:

Between Teddy's contract and picking up Sam's option...mind boggling moves.

Exactly! We had already agreed we overcommitted to Teddy but then we go and do the same thing with Darnold? It just made no sense. Moves like that make really iffy with Fitt and Tepp even with Rhule gone. 
 

Was there really no one in the room who thought it could be a bad idea?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they should send him packing at the tail end of the season.   I don’t think he deserves to stay here. 

Keeping him feels like keeping Rhule headed into this season. Pointless.  He has been too involved in this mess and somehow gets a pass from it all. 

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, NJPanthers12 said:

This is what bad organizations do. The GM and the Coach should be on the same clock.

Scott should either be fired or he should be able to hire coach and gets as long as the coach does. 

My assumption is that is exactly what is going to happen 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He did what I needed to see so I am willing to wait and see at this point...but it's too damn close still. He had a hand in a lot of bad here. Setting up for a good offseason is not only good but it was necessary. I expect to see another trade (Shaq) at some point but he has done well from what we know in the past 2 weeks. If they can avoid giving out stupid heavy backended deals to keep players happy to stay and just limp into the offseason then we should be in a solid spot to hire a competent HC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, firefox1234 said:

Exactly! We had already agreed we overcommitted to Teddy but then we go and do the same thing with Darnold? It just made no sense. Moves like that make really iffy with Fitt and Tepp even with Rhule gone. 
 

Was there really no one in the room who thought it could be a bad idea?

To be fair, I believe it was Hurney who made the Teddy deal, not Fiterrer.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, JVic said:

"Collection of pics is equivalent to a late first" ...

Really?  Then you should now be able to trade them all to someone for a late first rounder.     

I believe he could, but I don’t see the need unless we’re moving up to select a QB who dropped and we didn’t get one with our first. 
 

I like the chances we hit on two starters with those picks. We’ll have the first pick or so in the second anyway. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure 19 is too high for Rodriguez anymore.  He looks to be moving up boards, but it could be smokescreens.  
    • I see XL this way---great athlete.  Good person.  When we drafted him, we knew he was raw.  One year of WR in college (starting) and in HS, he was a QB, I believe. We knew we would need patience with him.  I think year 3 will be make or break.  He is older, and I think that people with his athletic ability have always been better than those with less---but those with less can become more successful.  Why is that?  in my view, it is mental. XL can learn the mechanics and nuances of playing WR if he becomes focused on it and works at it.  I had the opportunity to talk to Armanti Edwards one day after OTAs (great guy) and he discussed how overwhelming it was.  He seemed shocked.  At that time, I knew that Fox hated the pick (I heard him mock Armanti to another coach when he saw Edwards drop a punt from a jugs machine--then I saw Armanti look back at Fox as if to suggest that he was feeling the pressure to please the coach. We forget that these are kids in their early 20s.  At the time, Fox was a lame duck.  Remember when he had Clausen as the #3 QB and was forced to move him up the ladder?  I liked Fox, but I think the climate and culture was influenced by the politics.  Currently, I see another Wr from SC who is struggling, but he is ina  very nurturing, positive culture. Let's see what happens with XL.  I am frustrated too---but XL was a second round talent who was raw and we traded up to get him.  He had 500 yards as a rookie--lets call 2025 a sophomore slump and see if we can't get at least 50 yards per game out of him.  If not, cut bait.
    • Sadiq feels like a lazy comp.  Sure he would be a big improvement over what we have but at a position we don't and maybe can't (midget qb) utilize.  I hope the staff puts together a list of players you automatically take at 19 (Freeling, Lemon, Downs, Faulk) and if none are there, trade back to look at (Thieneman, McNeil-Warren, Proctor, Lomu, Allen, Iheanachor, Banks, Woods).  I get the people that think an OT would be a waste because we temporarily patched that hole, and ILB and safety are a waste because that is high to take those particular positions, but by trading back we get extra picks to fill every need.  A draft that has an OT, S, ILB, slot WR, and C would really put us in a good position moving forward if we get an extra first three rounds additional pick.   
×
×
  • Create New...