Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Other Games

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

WeDoNotTank Collaborator

WeDoNotTank

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Varking said:

If the Bears score 5 points the rest of the game they will have scored more than we have in any game this year. 
 

And Fields is responsible for over 200 yards in the first half. 

If and when and one game a lot of guys look good in a game or two a season it doesn't change they don't even average 16ppg.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, Panthers Fan 69 said:

We get it bro. You like fields.  My brother n law loves the bears so we watch a lot of games. Fields has been trash last year and just as bad this year. Bears fans aren’t sold on him and already want a new qb. But it’s ok.  Like who you like man. 

Peyton Manning would have been garbage in a zone read heavy O.  Cam Newton would have been garbage in Tom Brady’s late Patriot scheme. 

Fields hasn’t been good.  But the Bears have done him little favors overall since drafting him.  I mean he is running tonight but overall the O has never been catered to his strengths

where you get drafted has a lot to do with your ability to have success 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, CRA said:

Peyton Manning would have been garbage in a zone read heavy O.  Cam Newton would have been garbage in Tom Brady’s late Patriot scheme. 

Fields hasn’t been good.  But the Bears have done him little favors overall since drafting him. 

where you get drafted has a lot to do with your ability to have success 

Fun fact his 2 starting tackles were 5th round picks (and it shows).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PNW_PantherMan Grand Master

PNW_PantherMan

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, CRA said:

Peyton Manning would have been garbage in a zone read heavy O.  Cam Newton would have been garbage in Tom Brady’s late Patriot scheme. 

Fields hasn’t been good.  But the Bears have done him little favors overall since drafting him.  I mean he is running tonight but overall the O has never been catered to his strengths

where you get drafted has a lot to do with your ability to have success 

Not sure what the Nagy administration was thinking, but it feels like the Eberflus staff is gonna make him fit their system rather than shaping the system for him.  And if that doesn't work they'll probably look for a new QB.  Just my speculation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, CRA said:

Peyton Manning would have been garbage in a zone read heavy O.  Cam Newton would have been garbage in Tom Brady’s late Patriot scheme. 

Fields hasn’t been good.  But the Bears have done him little favors overall since drafting him.  I mean he is running tonight but overall the O has never been catered to his strengths

where you get drafted has a lot to do with your ability to have success 

When you keep spending huge resources on QBs and they all suck, it might not be all the QBs' fault.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CRA
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By CRA · Posted

      This is about getting open and YAC....and the QB we have.  You basically are just highlighting average depth when targeted vs 2 players. .  And yeah, I often say AT is a small slow reliable TE in terms of what he does for us.   That's what he is.   I think a couple of you want to make this into a Renfrow argument.   I'm a Renfrow fan.  Renfrow does not check the box of what a BY O needs either at the slot.  Renfrow just a niche roleplayer at this level.  it's easy to look up how horrific AT is with the ball in his hands and in terms of getting open.....and it's also easy to look up what a low ceiling of an offense the steady AT diet produces w/ BY. 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Panthers' content round up

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      The one time he's actively tried to lose was the best we've ever done.
    • CRA
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By CRA · Posted

      I simply acknowledge BY is the QB.  And just like we did when we drafted him.....the type O you would need to setup around him for success was always pretty simple.  But we have done virtually the opposite.  XL dropping some passes isn't why we were ranked the 32nd O and 30th passing the past 2 years.  *Ricky Prohel was brought up only in regards to role function he served on the team.  Niche/specialist.   He wasn't eating up the snaps in the O.    AT should have a similar snap %. People could MAUL Ricky Prohel and put hands all over him.   We got to the Super Bowl in part because we were mauling guys (our slot CB).   You can't do that now.  AT has a MUCH easier life and still can't get open.  Or run.    If you live in 3 WR sets, with a weak armed QB, and you choose to put someone who can't get open or run in the slot.......well, your are going to have a weak pass O.  That's by design IMO.  
×
×
  • Create New...