Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

College Games


Shocker
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, ECHornet said:

Give me Bennett over Richardson all day. I’d much rather have a guy with lesser tools but knows how to play the position and distribute to playmakers over a physical prototype who struggles to read the field. I also favor Young over Stroud for similar reasons. 

Bennett has no chance in the pros. None. You might be able to develop Richardson. You aren’t going to do more for Bennett. 
 

Richardson against UGAs defense with minimal pass catching talent:

18 of 39 for 271 yards with 1 TD 0 INT.

Bennett going against a poor Florida defense with all world talent at TE:

19 of 38 for 316 yards and 2 TDS and 2 INT. 
 

You might develop Richardson into something. You’re literally wasting a roster spot on Bennett. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Varking said:

Bennett has no chance in the pros. None. You might be able to develop Richardson. You aren’t going to do more for Bennett. 
 

Richardson against UGAs defense with minimal pass catching talent:

18 of 39 for 271 yards with 1 TD 0 INT.

Bennett going against a poor Florida defense with all world talent at TE:

19 of 38 for 316 yards and 2 TDS and 2 INT. 
 

You might develop Richardson into something. You’re literally wasting a roster spot on Bennett. 

Richardsons misses where missed by a mile today tho.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

Richardsons misses where missed by a mile today tho.

For sure. But he can get better and he has the actual physical tools to play at the next level. It’s why scouts are high on him. You aren’t drafting a guy to perform in college. You are drafting him because you think he can grow in the pros. Bennett right now is exactly what you get in the pros. Small frame, average arm, average wheels, elevated by talent around him and still not putting up any stats either. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Varking said:

For sure. But he can get better and he has the actual physical tools to play at the next level. It’s why scouts are high on him. You aren’t drafting a guy to perform in college. You are drafting him because you think he can grow in the pros. Bennett right now is exactly what you get in the pros. Small frame, average arm, average wheels, elevated by talent around him and still not putting up any stats either. 

No one is seriously considering Bennett over Richardson. This guy is just trying to so how much he doesn’t like Richardson. No actual NFL team would consider Bennett over Richardson. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Aaron Donald's brother. He's a QB. 
    • To be fair, Tyson is a well-rounded route runner, has good speed and great separation. I think of him as a taller JSN with the same wiggles and ability to play outside or in the slot. He would be a great cherry on top to our young WR corps between TMac and Coker.  He might not be a burner, but his short area quicks and ability to turn DBs around with ease is appealing.  Personally, I think it's a luxury pick and hope we go elsewhere. I think Dan and Dave do as well.  I also think DJ is one of the most respected draft analysts in the league. He has his fingers on the pulse, especially front office whispers, in addition to the draft prospects themselves. He's always been very fair to the Panthers, and IMO, covers them better than the Shultzes and Kipers of the football world. He also went to App St. Depending on how the board falls, Tyson could technically be seen as BPA at 19. Dude was and still is a top-10 selection despite a rough 2025 season at ASU. Our WR unit is not a complete room yet, so it's not that outragious if we truly are looking BPA.  Me personally, I want OT, LB, DT or FS at 19. In DJ's scenario, I'd take any of Faulk, Woods, Lomu or Allen. I personally like the Texas LB more than Allen, and think he's a better compliment to Wallace, but Allen does give me Jon Beason vibes, so wouldn't be mad there either.   
×
×
  • Create New...