Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

DJ Moore should not have been penalized for helmet removal


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

37 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

Never seen them take the helmet off for the Lambeau leap

That’s referring to a separate penalty, the “excessive” part. Taking the helmet off is only a penalty in the field of play, the reference to the Lambeau Leap was if they wanted to try to call it “excessive celebration” instead of taking the helmet off

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, JawnyBlaze said:

Ok I was off with the “didn’t touch” but he still had the helmet completely on when he was completely out of bounds 

image.thumb.png.379e39b410ea2d1c80e452406c46a083.png

 

Something lost in all of this ayway is that Stephen Sullivan pretty clearly took his helmet off within the boundaries. He was, for whatever reason, playing in that final snap; the first shot is a bit blurry, but that's him in the lower left. The controversy about Moore will brew but Sullivan also appears to be in violation, even if it wasn't officially called.Sullivan2.thumb.JPG.bbb1c55eba16dde85e561c7ee1607fd8.JPG

 

 

Sullivan.JPG

Edited by KSpan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, JawnyBlaze said:

That’s referring to a separate penalty, the “excessive” part. Taking the helmet off is only a penalty in the field of play, the reference to the Lambeau Leap was if they wanted to try to call it “excessive celebration” instead of taking the helmet off

I'm telling you that field of play for the purpose of celebrating is extended to any area outside of your coaches box.

I've seen it thrown at all three levels hs,college and pro.

I don't have to agree with it but these rules have existed for a long time.

It was a stupid move on his part.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

I'm telling you that field of play for the purpose of celebrating is extended to any area outside of your coaches box.

I've seen it thrown at all three levels hs,college and pro.

I don't have to agree with it but these rules have existed for a long time.

It was a stupid move on his part.

I don’t believe that for a second. If you can find it in writing then I’m wrong, but a former official disagrees with you and common sense disagrees. If he had caught a pass where he took his helmet off, it would not have been a catch because it would be out of the field of play. The field of play is the field where the game is played. Anything outside the boundary lines is not where the game is played

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes it was a lame call and the NFL is not consistent.  And yes, it should probably be removed as a rule because it's stupid.  But a good rule of thumb is just never take off your helmet in that situation.  I don't hold it against DJ as much as some people are.  He's had a pretty rough season and that play was unbelievable.  Just learn from it and move on.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Captroop said:

Never seen NFL rule analysis in haiku.

Was in response to Peter King's weekly Haiku, which in this week's column https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2022/10/31/christian-mccaffrey-peter-king-fmia-week-eight/ was

Keep your helmet on.
Dumb rule, but it is a rule.
Panthers pay dearly.

I have more issues with PK's writing this week (although for once, he did write mostly positively about the Panthers).   But based on this AND with respect to Tony's tweet (and other comments suggesting it shouldn't have been a penalty), it sounds like PK just didn't want to go back and revisit something he decided upon and wrote hours earlier before publication.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, PanthersATL said:

Was in response to Peter King's weekly Haiku, which in this week's column https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2022/10/31/christian-mccaffrey-peter-king-fmia-week-eight/ was

Keep your helmet on.
Dumb rule, but it is a rule.
Panthers pay dearly.

I have more issues with PK's writing this week (although for once, he did write mostly positively about the Panthers).   But based on this AND with respect to Tony's tweet (and other comments suggesting it shouldn't have been a penalty), it sounds like PK just didn't want to go back and revisit something he decided upon and wrote hours earlier before publication.

Yea obviously neither King nor Florio or whoever wrote the response article to the game actually watched any of it because they both said he took his helmet off in the field of play, which is obviously incorrect. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, trueblade said:

People keep overlooking this for some reason.

With you, totally on the kicker to make the shot.

But he shouldn't have been put in a 15-yard hole for the first attempt.    Blame the refs or blame DJ, one way or the other the first kick was made more difficult than it should have been.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, JawnyBlaze said:

I don’t believe that for a second. If you can find it in writing then I’m wrong, but a former official disagrees with you and common sense disagrees. If he had caught a pass where he took his helmet off, it would not have been a catch because it would be out of the field of play. The field of play is the field where the game is played. Anything outside the boundary lines is not where the game is played

This is probably the interpretation being used. The field is any area outside the coaches box. Unless you are reading it different than me. The broken yellow line is still part of the field

 

The playing field will be rimmed by a solid white border six feet wide along
the end lines and sidelines. There will be an additional broken yellow line nine
feet farther outside this border along each sideline in the non-bench areas,
and such broken line will be continued at an angle from each 25-yard line and
pass behind the bench area (all benches a minimum of 30 feet back from the
sidelines) at a distance of six feet. In each end zone, this broken yellow line is
six feet from the solid white border. These yellow broken lines are to be eight
inches wide and two feet long with a space of one foot between them.
In addition, within each bench area, a solid yellow line six feet behind
the solid border will delineate a special area for coaches, behind which all
players, except one player who is charting the game, must remain. Furthermore,
a broken white line four inches wide and four feet long with a space of two-
foot intervals will be marked three feet inside the nine-foot restriction line on
the sideline, extending to meet the existing yellow broken line six feet behind
both end zones and at each television box outside the bench area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

I'm telling you that field of play for the purpose of celebrating is extended to any area outside of your coaches box.

I've seen it thrown at all three levels hs,college and pro.

I don't have to agree with it but these rules have existed for a long time.

It was a stupid move on his part.

You need to argue with the NBC NFL Rules Analyst.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I thought he had a few really nice flashes.  I can see him showing out this year 
    • I have heard that before--when standing in front of a full body mirror at Old Navy.  I said it, actually. Seriously, Let's go on what we know. There is reason for optimism that exceeds random opinions and negativity: 1. Last year, the offense was the priority and the interior offensive line was the focal point. Morgan addressed it in free agency and the draft. They improved.  2.  Last year, Canales pulled Young after 2 games and replaced him with an established veteran.  Instead of giving up on Young, he developed him, primarily focusing on his footwork and timing.  Continued development in his fundamentals should result in improved play.  (this is significant because some athletes rely on natural ability and do not adapt well.  They resort to old habits. This means that Bryce is "teachable" and is willing to face adversity and fight through it.  That is what you want in a QB.) 3. Morgan drafted a raw talent at WR; and we all knew he was raw.  Huddlers are already calling it a bust, but his productivity numbers were in line with the other WRs drafted around where he was drafted.  So, yes, he was a bit disappointing, but what part of "Raw" is not understood here?  Evil Bryce, then inconsistent Dalton, then good Bryce--all while facing the top defensive backs--and let's not forget about his lingering injuries--and we should understand XL's productivity.  Morgan was looking for a home run based on XL's 1-season productivity and his freakish athleticism, but I always thought we would not know what we have until year 2.  TMac alone will make XL better--a solid #2. 4.  If you blame Morgan for drafting XL, you must give him credit for making Coker a priority free agent.  In my view, he addressed WR in 2024 pretty effectively in the long view.  5.  Let's look at the rest of the draft.  Brooks?  The best RB in the draft in round 2?  Morgan was attempting to build a solid run game behind Bryce.  Wallace was a very solid third round pick at LB. Sanders is a strong TE for a fourth round pick. 6.  Not much is being said about the development of Chau Smith-Wade.  His improvement mirrors Bryce Young's, actually.  In his first 8 games, his PFF rating was 36.5.  In the final 9 games, his PFF rating was 66.7.   7.  With so many needs, Morgan hit the UDFA market with success. In addition to Coker, Demani Richardson got 400+ snaps and had a 60.1 PFF grade, including an interception. 8.  In free agency, Morgan spent big bucks on Guards, a move that made his QB better. He added David Moore, Nijman,  He signed Clowney, Wonnum, Robinson, Jewel, Chaisson, Fuller, Scott, D. Jackson, Dionte Johnson, etc.  A few years of Fitterer left him with more holes that players.  Some did not work out, but he did all this on a budget (after he splurged on Lewis and Hunt).  It is hard to get a free agent to come to a team that loses--so in some cases, Morgan had to overpay or accept questionable players. Morgan's first year as a GM demonstrated an understanding of the game like we have not seen since Polian, before his lost it. Canales, on the other hand, should be rated by the improvement of players.  Zavala, Ekwonu, Mays, Young, Smith-Wade, Coker, Wallace--all improved.  He had to overcome major losses such as D. Brown, Shaq, Dionte Johnson, Corbett--and we saw growth.  Despite all this team went through, after 8 games of disarray, This team finished 4-5 with close losses to both Super Bowl teams.  Frankly, I do not know how he did it. This year was better.  The WR room is solid with depth.  The OL room is solid with depth.  The TE room is as good as it has been in a while.  The RB room has the potential to be as good as it was when we had 28 and 34.  DBs?  Better.  DL?  Better.  Edge?  better.  The bottom of the roster?  Much better. We really don't know what we have yet, and that makes this offseason exciting.      
    • Here you go. 2 yards. Bryce Sneak.mp4
×
×
  • Create New...