Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     


saX man
 Share

Recommended Posts

This will probably be downvoted, but I am curious what DJax would fetch on the trade market, as well as dead $$ he would cost us. I'm assuming it's similar to Shaq where it's not worth the cap hit.

I am not opposed to keeping him per se, just wondering if he could net us more in assets than his long-term projection with this team. The flip side is that between Horn-Jackson-Henderson-Taylor, we have four CBs that can compete. 

Personally, I think Taylor, though a different style of CB has equal to if not higher upside with us long-term. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Soul Rebel said:

This will probably be downvoted, but I am curious what DJax would fetch on the trade market, as well as dead $$ he would cost us. I'm assuming it's similar to Shaq where it's not worth the cap hit.

I am not opposed to keeping him per se, just wondering if he could net us more in assets than his long-term projection with this team. The flip side is that between Horn-Jackson-Henderson-Taylor, we have four CBs that can compete. 

Personally, I think Taylor, though a different style of CB has equal to if not higher upside with us long-term. 

He is injured and would cause a bunch of dead cap. This would be the worst possible moment to trade Jackson.

Edited by TheCasillas
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

They are letting Montgomery walk…. He isn’t the number 1 RB there anymore.

They better get to it with Herbert already for my fantasy team.  That boy cooks it every time he touches the ball.  Just like Pollard in Dallas right now.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, UpstatePantherfan said:

I still say we will likely end up regretting not trading Burns. Nothing against burns at all and I I like him a lot as a player, but short of him being Julius Peppers or Micah parson 2.0, you take two 1sts and a additional 3rd rounder or so for him and never look back. 

If it becomes the case he doesn't want to re-sign here or is asking too much, we'll have until next year's deadline.  Have some time with his 5th year option.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I’m really having a hard time understanding how this actually went down. -Renfrow expected to make roster as 2nd/3rd string. -Panthers cut Renfrow; Keep Brycen Tremayne, and add UDFA receiver (Dalevon Campbell) to active roster.  -Canales/Morgan say it’s totally up to Hunter whether he wants to come back or not, they would love to have him.    -Renfrow not signed to PS -Panthers trade Adam Thielen -Hunter Renfrow signed to active roster with a raise after an injury to Coker nobody heard about and is likely to start.    Our WR room is now: -Xavier Legette (2024 1st round pick) -Tet McMillan (2025 1st round pick) -Hunter Renfrow (1 year out of the league) -David Moore (Canales’ friend? A guy way past his prime) -Jimmy Horn (Likely a Shi Smith reprint, but has potential 2025 6th round pick, weighs 174 lbs) -Brycen Tremayne (2023 UDFA who was on Washington’s PS for 2 years and caught 1 pass for -2 yards and averaged 300 yards per year at Stanford) -Dalevon Campbell (2025 UDFA had a good preseason but had 1463 yards and 3 TDs over 5 college seasons at 3 different schools). What the hell is going on?  
    • Not uncommon for week 1 games. Especially against good defenses. It’s why I prefer my team play these small schools week 1 if they are going to play them. Gives the offense time to get calibrated. 
×
×
  • Create New...