Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

We even messed up on tanking


RumHam
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, PootieNunu said:

What good is Burns now when we arent winning poo and we are about to have to pay him the big bucks, take a step back, clear your head and use common sense bro.

We arent winning poo before we get to use those picks anyway, Burns is garbage as an every down DE. 

What is fuging insane is getting so attached to these players that you make up in your mind that they are beter than what they actually are. Burns had tons of potential, but he never lived up to it, he is still the same guy he was his rookie year. 

My god you guys get too attached to guys. If it was up to most of you we would still have CMC instead of the 49ers entire draft. 

but but but he is a leader........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

but but but he is a leader........

Yea leading us straight to 5 fuging wins a season......

Some of these guys act like Burns is TJ Watt. 

Burns has minimal impact on the game, other than when the other team decides to go power run to his side, then you definitely notice him.

I liked Burns a lot coming out but he never developed, he is still the same.

He should be a dark horse DPOY candidate now, instead he is just a pass rush guy who whiffs on a lot of sacks and gives up big plays in the run game.

Edited by PootieNunu
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, PootieNunu said:

Yea leading us straight to 5 fuging wins a season......

Some of these guys act like Burns is TJ Watt. 

Burns has minimal impact on the game, other than when the other team decides to go power run to his side, then you definitely notice him.

When he wasnt getting bulldozed during the run game yesterday his (almost) sack of burrow where he fell down trying to make the play is picture perfect not only of his career but the panthers as a whole.   Just tripping on our dicks whenever it matters.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can see getting frustrated with the Burns trade getting rejected. The Moore one wasn’t that great of a deal. Are we going to trade away our young OL too since we have a bad record? We need to keep SOME pieces to A) Attract a good HC candidate and B) Help our rookie find success at this level.

A 1st from GB who has been a playoff team every year would probably be a late first for our top offensive weapon on a decent contract.

On a side note we need to start giving Barno and Brandon Smith reps. If our defense is going to play that bad, might as well get these rookies some experience…

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

I can see getting frustrated with the Burns trade getting rejected. The Moore one wasn’t that great of a deal. Are we going to trade away our young OL too since we have a bad record? We need to keep SOME pieces to A) Attract a good HC candidate and B) Help our rookie find success at this level.

A 1st from GB who has been a playoff team every year would probably be a late first for our top offensive weapon on a decent contract.

On a side note we need to start giving Barno and Brandon Smith reps. If our defense is going to play that bad, might as well get these rookies some experience…

Why do you guys have to drag up stupid ideas to make keeping Burns look good? Thats how you know it was an idiotic decision to turn that down.

When you have to bring up insane hypotheticals to justify it. 

I still gave you a pie because I want to see Smith and Barno play as well. 

Edited by PootieNunu
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PootieNunu said:

Why do you guys have to drag up stupid ideas to make keeping Burns look good? Thats how you know it was an idiotic decision to turn that down.

When you have to bring up insane hypotheticals to justify it. 

I still gave you a pie because I want to see Smith and Barno play as well. 

I think you misread my post or perhaps I wasn’t clear. I understand people being frustrated with that deal not happening. It was a good haul and Burns is going to want to be paid.

The keeping some talent was in reference to the GB trade for Moore. It’s wasn’t good enough for eating his dead hit and losing a young WR on a good contract. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

I think you misread my post or perhaps I wasn’t clear. I understand people being frustrated with that deal not happening. It was a good haul and Burns is going to want to be paid.

The keeping some talent was in reference to the GB trade for Moore. It’s wasn’t good enough for eating his dead hit and losing a young WR on a good contract. 

Oh ok, I was cool with not trading Moore as I think most of us where. That wasnt good value for him. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, frankw said:

So Burns sucks but a team was willing to give up 2 firsts and supposedly a 2nd for him? Some of ya'll just need to take a break from the losing if it's getting to you this bad.

Another guy whos willing to spend two 1sts and a 2nd for 8.5 sacks a season and no run support.

8.5 sacks a year are numbers that run stuffing DEs put up bro. Burns is a pass rush specialist. 

Edited by PootieNunu
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trading Moore makes no sense, especially if we are about to embark on drafting a QB.

On Burns, I suspect that it wasn’t just about the 2 firsts but rather that they didn’t want to lose a possible cornerstone of the new HC. Better to get the HC in place and then either extend or trade following their thinking.

Trading can happen in the post season so this might not be the last we hear on Burns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Jesus H Christ, the 2nd was coming from 2023.  Giving us 3 total.  The two firsts in the subsequent years and 2 things: we aint winning poo next year with a rookie qb so the timing fits perfectly and the more importantly the rams are looking like dogshit from here on out and those picks are going to be high.  Again lining up with our rebuild perfectly

 

The whole "the picks are in the future so they are worthless" argument is fuging retarded at fuging best

So for an immediate 2nd the team loses their current leader in sacks, TFLs, and QB hits? Then two future firsts so that they can wait another season to potentially trade up for a QB? No thank you. No head coach worth their pay wants to come to a team with no players and a bunch of lotto tickets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Here’s a summary of the JJ and Luke podcast transcript. Opening / Bryce Young Fifth-Year Option     •    JJ: Breaking news — Panthers picked up Bryce Young’s fifth-year option at $25.9M, guaranteed, coming in 2027. Combined with his 2025 salary of ~$6M, that’s $31M over two years — called it a “no-brainer.”     •    Luke: Enthusiastic about the move. Highlighted Bryce’s improving TD/INT ratios (11/10 → 15/9 → 23/11) and the value of entering year three with Dave Canales. Noted $25M is a bargain relative to the $60M top of market. Luke’s Personal Update — Charlotte Christian Football     •    Luke: Working with Charlotte Christian school football program, which hired a new head coach. Coaches include Greg Olsen, Luke, and Greg’s dad Chris Olsen (a New Jersey State coaching Hall of Famer).     •    JJ: Jokingly quipped that Charlotte Christian’s coaching staff is “the world’s greatest” — a Fox analyst, a Hall of Famer, and the best Panthers RB ever — all coaching middle school football.     •    Luke: Praised Chris Olsen’s deep football knowledge spanning decades and his ability to connect with kids. Round 1, Pick 19 — Monroe Freeling, OT, Georgia     •    JJ: Panthers were on the clock and submitted their pick almost immediately — a sign of confidence and preparation. Freeling is 6’7”, 320 lbs, played in the SEC in a pro-style system.     •    Luke: Loved the pick. Emphasized you can never have too many quality offensive linemen. Noted Freeling’s size, athleticism, and arm length as key traits. Said the pick also reflects team’s philosophy of drafting great people, not just great players.     •    JJ: Noted reporter Darren Gantt compared Freeling favorably to Jordan Gross — bigger, heavier, and faster — as a potential franchise left tackle.     •    Luke: Pointed out that young players like Freeling still have physical development ahead of them, comparing the trajectory to Christian McCaffrey’s growth from age 20 onward. Round 2, Pick 49 — Lee Hunter, DT, Texas Tech     •    JJ: Panthers traded up from 51 to 49 (pick swap with Minnesota) to grab Hunter. Played audio from Panthers area scout Kaden McLuhan, who scouted Hunter.     •    Scout Kaden McLuhan (audio): Said Hunter’s size is immediately striking, and that everyone around him spoke glowingly about his character, energy, and love for the game.     •    Luke: Praised Hunter as a massive (6’3”, 320 lbs, ~34” arms) two-gap nose tackle who fits perfectly in the Evero defense. Compared his prospect profile to Akiem Hicks. Said having Derek Brown, Bobby Brown, Derrick Brown, Terson Wharton, and now Hunter creates varied body types that stress offensive linemen.     •    JJ: Noted Hunter ranked third among all prospects in run-stuff rate and sixth in interior pass-rush win rate — addressing a perception that he couldn’t rush the passer. Rounds 3–7 Highlights     •    Luke: Highlighted WR Brazle (3rd round, 6’4”, 437 speed, 1,000+ yards at Tennessee) as the vertical threat the offense needed. Also praised OL Sam Heck (5th round) as a technically sound player whose “short arms” caused him to fall but who has proven himself.     •    Luke: Mentioned CB Will Lee (6’1”, 33” arms) fits the Panthers’ DB prototype — big, long corners.     •    Luke: Praised S/LB hybrid Zaki Wheatley (5th round, 6’3”) as a big nickel similar to Trayvon Merek.     •    Luke: Excited about the linebacker competition between Devin Lloyd, Trevvin Wallace, and Claudin Cherless.     •    JJ: Noted Panthers had the #1 “steal/overreach” rating in the entire draft — drafting players lower than consensus big boards projected. Around the League     •    Luke: Admitted being “a little jealous” that the Miami Dolphins drafted LB Jacob Rodriguez (Luke’s favorite LB in the draft). Has personal connections to Miami’s coaching staff (Jeff Hafley, DC Shawn Dugen — a childhood teammate).     •    Luke: Also noted Miami’s selection of OT/G Kaden Proctor out of Alabama, who will likely move to guard. League Trends — Bigger Tight Ends / 12 & 13 Personnel     •    JJ: Observed the NFL saw its highest run rate in ~11 years (~52%) and a notable pivot toward big blocking tight ends in this draft.     •    Luke: Explained the cyclical nature of NFL offense/defense evolution — as defenses get smaller to match spread offenses, teams counter with bigger personnel (12/13 formations), which then forces defenses to get bigger at the nickel/“big nickel” spot. Called it an ongoing arms race.
    • Dan Vladar is their best player and that is going to be the difference in the series 
×
×
  • Create New...