Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Lamar Jackson


DaveThePanther2008
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

1-3 vs 10-5 vs Prime Manning,Brady and Big Ben for Flacco

Yeah he's on the same level as Flacco

image.thumb.png.61ffa01bfc0c63916e274cbd69e2f399.png

  .Convenient again how you didn’t mention Flacco was 26-33 from 2015–19. And LJ has went 43-15 since. I guess the “pocket passing” model hit a wall at age 30. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Catsfan69 said:

Or maybe Flacco's arm wore out?

How? That doesn’t happen to guys that can make every throw. Just QBs who run. Right? 
 

  Sure doesn’t seem like the Ravens were better off with Flacco. Dig up some actual relevant information. Who know? You might get lucky. 

Edited by Toomers
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

A ring trumps all things.

I don't if it's one in 20yrs 

So you think Foles is a legit top QB in the league.  Foles, Flacco, Brady, Mahomes, Stafford, Rogers, and Russ are the only ones with rings right now.  Foles is greater than Herbert, Burrow, Ryan, Dak, Lamar, and Allen (according to you).  Foles is on par with Brees, Rogers, Mahomes, Stafford and Russ (according to you).    Another reason why we can't take your QB takes very seriously....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

So you think Foles is a legit top QB in the league.  Foles, Flacco, Brady, Mahomes, Stafford, Rogers, and Russ are the only ones with rings right now.  Foles is greater than Herbert, Burrow, Ryan, Dak, Lamar, and Allen (according to you).  Foles is on par with Brees, Rogers, Mahomes, Stafford and Russ (according to you).    Another reason why we can't take your QB takes very seriously....

I would take the majority of those players over Lamar.

Lamar isn't worth the price he's going to ask for. He's the Brian Burns of QBs.

We need to aim higher.

 

But I think you Jimmy amongst others are more worried about style points than results. You'd rather have a flashy guy that looks cool and gives you tingles over a boring guy that just gets the job done and wind.

You'd probably take Lamar over Payton Manning if they were both coming out of college at the same time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey here is a great idea, let’s let our new head coach and Scott decide what QB we should go after. It is obvious Rhule had no idea what type of QB he wanted. The next coach may want a veteran or a QB in the draft. I am not a fan of giving up two years worth of 1st round picks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

I would take the majority of those players over Lamar.

Lamar isn't worth the price he's going to ask for. He's the Brian Burns of QBs.

We need to aim higher.

 

But I think you Jimmy amongst others are more worried about style points than results. You'd rather have a flashy guy that looks cool and gives you tingles over a boring guy that just gets the job done and wind.

You'd probably take Lamar over Payton Manning if they were both coming out of college at the same time.

I like them to be able to make a play even when the OL breaks down.  Burrow is pretty good at that and I wouldn't say he has a ton of "style" points, younger Rogers was also good at this.  You are just too caught up in Super Bowl wins when that is without a doubt a TEAM effort and usually requires a solid HC as well.  Look no further than Stafford with Detroit (how many playoff games did he win there?).  Give that good QB and great team and solid HC and BOOM Super Bowl.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

I would take the majority of those players over Lamar.

Lamar isn't worth the price he's going to ask for. He's the Brian Burns of QBs.

We need to aim higher.

 

But I think you Jimmy amongst others are more worried about style points than results. You'd rather have a flashy guy that looks cool and gives you tingles over a boring guy that just gets the job done and wind.

You'd probably take Lamar over Payton Manning if they were both coming out of college at the same time.

Lamar flew under the radar a little in college.  I didn't think he could do what he is doing on this level.  This year I like Stroud (who isn't a runner), Young (size concerns scare me), then Levis/Richardson as project QBs with high ceilings, Penix has some potential, but more as the left handed gun slinger.  What's your solution to our QB issue?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'll say 6. I don't know that we learned a whole lot about this team during preseason that we didn't already know. We didn't play the starters enough to really get a feel for what to expect. We had one good drive against the Browns, one 3-and-out and two 3-and-outs against the Texans. That's an extremely small sample size across 3 games regardless of performance. My camp/preseason takeaways: Jalen Coker might be the best WR on this team and is certainly no worse than #2. Nic Scourton is going to be a good player for us. Possibly very good. Bobby Brown was our best free agent addition and will do more to help the defense than anyone. Jack Plummer isn't an NFL QB. Not even a practice squad guy. Having anyone other than Canales and Evero call plays was a really stupid and pointless idea. Our depth is largely non-existent, especially on defense. The three areas we actually DO have depth are on the OL, in the WR corp. and at RB. I can't fathom why Dan Morgan didn't do more to upgrade ILB during the offseason. We better hope Lathan Ransom steps up at FS because if he doesn't we have a massive hole there. For all the hype surrounding Sanders and Evans, Tommy Tremble is still the best TE on the roster. I'm only slightly less enthusiastic going into the regular season than I was a month ago. I think our starters on offense are solid and we should be pretty good there unless Bryce totally regresses. On defense, we're probably bottom 3rd in the league if 100% healthy and significantly worse than that if injuries become an issue. We badly need at least two of our rookies to become high-level players early (ideally one of the pass rushers + Ransom) and at least 2 of our free agent additions (ideally Moehrig + Bobby Brown) to be significant upgrades over last year. Call me pessimistically optimistic 😆
    • 2010 was worse. Not much worse but worse. 
    • Lol since 2017 the Panthers are 47-85,    Also since 2017 the Giants are 40-91-1   Lol  
×
×
  • Create New...