Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Luvu

1of10Charnatives

By 1of10Charnatives,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

1of10Charnatives Mentor

1of10Charnatives

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Just now, MHS831 said:

Not to derail your thread in any way--well deserved--but Brady Christensen has  been very strong at LG.

...

START YOUR OWN THREAD!

Can't get two posts into a thread for Luvu without someone changing the subject. What up with that? 

Sure, yeah, BC solid, that's not the topic here. 

I'm coming over to your house and changing the channel to Real House Wives of Des Moines every time you try to watch sports for a week.

  • Pie 4
  • Flames 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
1of10Charnatives Mentor

1of10Charnatives

Posted
  • Author
Posted
2 minutes ago, The Lobo said:

I’ve said this before, this team isn’t all that bad, playoffs…no, but the pieces are there. 

QB play is the one big obvious hole, followed by a second pass rusher to compliment Burns. Damien Wilson is a non entity at MLB, but that's one of the least important positions on the field these days on D. Upgrading that shouldn't be too hard.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
electro's horse Grand Master

electro's horse

Posted
Posted

I’ve been talking about Luvu since week 1 last year. All he does is make plays. 
 

unfortunately the panthers aren’t going to be in a position where they can pay a guy who isn’t good enough to build around but has a great nose for the ball. 
 

Luvu is going to walk to a contender and the panthers will hopefully get a comp pick for him. And good for him. He’ll spend the rest of his career signing two year contracts. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
1of10Charnatives Mentor

1of10Charnatives

Posted
  • Author
Posted
3 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

I’ve been talking about Luvu since week 1 last year. All he does is make plays. 
 

unfortunately the panthers aren’t going to be in a position where they can pay a guy who isn’t good enough to build around but has a great nose for the ball. 
 

Luvu is going to walk to a contender and the panthers will hopefully get a comp pick for him. And good for him. He’ll spend the rest of his career signing two year contracts. 

Why can't they pay him starter money but not break the bank? Unless you have a starter on a rookie deal, you have to pay going rate for the position unless you're underpaying for obvious talent deficiencies. Not everyone needs to be a "build around" piece nor do you need to pay them that way.

Whatever the going rate for a middle of the road non pass rushing linebacker is what we should offer. If Luvi won't take that, then let him walk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Icege Grand Master

Icege

Posted
Posted
31 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

I’ve been talking about Luvu since week 1 last year. All he does is make plays. 
 

unfortunately the panthers aren’t going to be in a position where they can pay a guy who isn’t good enough to build around but has a great nose for the ball. 
 

Luvu is going to walk to a contender and the panthers will hopefully get a comp pick for him. And good for him. He’ll spend the rest of his career signing two year contracts. 

Luvu isn't an FA until 2024 😄

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted (edited)
On 11/11/2022 at 7:02 AM, 1of10Charnatives said:

 

 

 

On 11/11/2022 at 7:02 AM, 1of10Charnatives said:

...

START YOUR OWN THREAD!

Can't get two posts into a thread for Luvu without someone changing the subject. What up with that? 

Sure, yeah, BC solid, that's not the topic here. 

I'm coming over to your house and changing the channel to Real House Wives of Des Moines every time you try to watch sports for a week.

But what if I don't start dumb ass threads every time I have a thought?  I thought you might get upset if I stole your MO. 

But you are welcome to visit my home any time you like.  I can always use a good laugh.

 

 

Edited by MHS831
Link to comment
Share on other sites
onmyown Grand Master

onmyown

Posted
Posted
On 11/11/2022 at 5:02 AM, The Lobo said:

I’ve said this before, this team isn’t all that bad, playoffs…no, but the pieces are there. 

5 wins four seasons in a row it’s looking like. Seems the ‘pieces’ are always there. We don’t need potential or talent, we need wins and competency.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mistuh Jones
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By Mistuh Jones · Posted

      This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...