Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Brian Burns has more sacks than any other player in NFL history under 25 years old


WarPanthers89
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

Burns does his best work when there is another good pass rushing DE on the other side of the formation. And I really think Marquis Haynes is far outplaying YGM right now. Haynes was a monster out there last night.

 

Every DE in the league does this best work under this scenario.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You don't trade a player unless you have someone to replace him. We don't have two DEs who can pass rush consistently so why get rid of the only player who can get consistent pressure. I don't care what they offer you. We are playing to win and Burns is a pivotal piece who has shown he can stay healthy. If the Rams were willing to offer what they did they must think he is worth it. Apparently the only folks who think he is overrated are fans on this board.  Just like we saw with all these can't miss QBs this next draft who are underperforming,, a bird in the hand who is a probowler is worth a lot more than two future picks in the bush years from now. It isn't Fitterer saving his ass it is Fitterer still trying to win in 2022. Seems the players and management still are fighting to win. Just like they should.

Edited by panthers55
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, *FreeFua* said:

Again, the only person it didn’t benefit was Scott Fitterer. Big picture wise you take the deal. However, Scott needs to cling onto whatever chance he has at putting together a competitive team next season to keep his job. Picks in 2024 and 2025 don’t help him. 

Yes, Scott Fitterer is so desperate to have a winning team next season, he traded away Christian McCaffrey.

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

A) You know what you were implying

B) Like I showed you that stat was wrong

So, me posting a link showing Burns stats was me saying he was better than Bosa?  Makes sense I guess.

The stat was not wrong because it went from 2019-2021 not my fault you are too dense to understand that. 

This season is not completed yet, those stats will be updated once it is.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jaxel said:

Go compare his stats with Bosa. Same draft class, Bosa was number two and Burns is on the same or better pace in all categories. And that with San Fran having a dominant pass rush everywhere since Bosa came into the league.

Bosa has played 16 less games than Burns due to injury in his second season.  So basically the same production in one less season.

I like Burns but he's not in the same league as Bosa.

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Sir Purr said:

So, me posting a link showing Burns stats was me saying he was better than Bosa?  Makes sense I guess.

The stat was not wrong because it went from 2019-2021 not my fault you are too dense to understand that. 

This season is not completed yet, those stats will be updated once it is.  

 

so we are not keeping stats in 2022, sounds good to me

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MasterAwesome said:

Bosa has played 16 less games than Burns due to injury in his second season.  So basically the same production in one less season.

I like Burns but he's not in the same league as Bosa.

Well it's not Burns fault Bosa isn't durable. That half the battle in the NFL.

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, countryboi said:

Man yall are going to talk Burns to death because Burns is still here because QBs, LT, DE and WR are some of the most coveted positions and the hardest to replace. 

We have WR's and LT locked down. Just need 2 QB's and 2 DE's. Burns is a 3-4 outside LB. Hanes I'm undecided on.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We could quibble about was that an answer to what I asked but I  don’t see it as being one. Look, he agreed to this Evero thing. Up front. Apparently anyway. Took the job with those conditions in place. I buy that and will work off of it.  This play calling issue isn’t the same thing. I am not in the mood to delve into Canales’ shortcomings and get out the pitchforks at the moment. I will abstain from that topic and stick to the quandary the dissenters who want to usurp his play calling power, find themselves in. As far as that goes I am still on the fence and think the play calling is Bryce centric and the play selection/playbook is affected. That does not mean I know that if the playbook was open he would be great play caller. Just that he is hampered right now.  Inserting an OC not of Canales’ approval changes the original parameters of the assumed agreement.  Unless you think Tepper placed a contractual prescription to allow Tepper to dictate that he can insert a play caller of his choosing after a time period if he is not satisfied with Canales’ work.  Which, do you really think that is in play?  I do not.    Unless it is, Canales has the option to yea or nay. As I said, it could be forced on him. But they only do that if they want him out.  And as of now his stock is up, I would have to say I don’t own any but I think it is up. He had the stadium rocking, the team in the playoffs, and has that sorry lil draft pick trending upward. Even at this very low rate.  I think he has ‘hand’ right now as they say on Seinfeld. This is something that may get play in the 2026 season, not now. IMO.     
    • Canes now have 19 losses on the year. Here is the truly alarming stat. 13 of those were multiple goal loses. 9 of those were 3 goal plus losses. This team is getting blown out more than any other year under Rod.     why?  Blue line is a total mess. It’s just no good with their combinations.  It pains me to say this, but they were mikes better with Burns and Orlov. They need Slavin so bad.  Health.  Size. The team is too small and has no physical play. Most forwards do not forecheck.  Worst under Rod.  Goalie play. Pretty average to sub par. PK is downright bad. It’s allowing a little over a goal a game. Worst under Rod.    Team will not win a playoff round under its current group of players. It’s not constructed to do so against heavy teams.      solutions.  Must get physical size by the trade deadline. Rod and Tulsky know this. That probably has to come with the 2C.  KKs size but a better scorer and meaner.  The need another physical winger.  Goalie. Either go all in on a top guy on a bad team or get average. Lastly, better defense. Need a Right shot heavy defenseman.  Yes that could mean someone’s favorite dman could sit. Looking at you Boom.    thats 3-4 new guys that must be brought in for them to have a chance at a cup.  And it’s all players that are different and better than what they have.  They have the cap. KK is gone. Add 4 mill back.    And then hope it’s jells unlike Mikko.  
×
×
  • Create New...