Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Post your 2023 Mocks/Simulations Here!


45catfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

Did a PFFer:

R1 Anthony Richardson QB Florida - Mega upside QB

R2 Dalton Kincaid TE Utah - Star TE

R3 Mazi Smith IDL Michigan - Monster next to Brown & Burns? Yes please

R3-4 Micah Baskerville LB LSU - Micah enters next to Luvu & Smith, Shaq exits

R3-4 Kenre Miller RB TCU - No problem in having him min RB3, competing for carries.  Have a committee like other good squads.

R4 Clayton Tune QB Houston - 2nd QB to see if there's a diamond here

R4-5 Malik Knowles WR KSU - One of the mid-round WRs I definitely like 

 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bear Hands said:

Did a PFFer:

R1 Anthony Richardson QB Florida - Mega upside QB

R2 Dalton Kincaid TE Utah - Star TE

R3 Mazi Smith IDL Michigan - Monster next to Brown & Burns? Yes please

R3-4 Micah Baskerville LB LSU - Micah enters next to Luvu & Smith, Shaq exits

R3-4 Kenre Miller RB TCU - No problem in having him min RB3, competing for carries.  Have a committee like other good squads.

R4 Clayton Tune QB Houston - 2nd QB to see if there's a diamond here

R4-5 Malik Knowles WR KSU - One of the mid-round WRs I definitely like 

 

Schitts Creek Comedy GIF by CBC

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The QBs were gone except for Levis in the first round, so I added a stud to the Dline in the first instead of risking the pick on Levis. Offense was the name of the game after that and I took a flyer on McKee in the 5th round to backup Corral and double dipped at TE and guard. Also took the best kicker left on the board in the 7th just to finally take a chance on a guy that could potentially hold down the spot for the next decade.

image.png.242ac859fc95f971c58864db2ade2d3b.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, jayboogieman said:

The QBs were gone except for Levis in the first round, so I added a stud to the Dline in the first instead of risking the pick on Levis. Offense was the name of the game after that and I took a flyer on McKee in the 5th round to backup Corral and double dipped at TE and guard. Also took the best kicker left on the board in the 7th just to finally take a chance on a guy that could potentially hold down the spot for the next decade.

/cdn-cgi/mirage/4713e9be4b843bf40ffb53dea3b7bef71d9fb426c5982a286c2618871506e4cd/1280/https://www.carolinahuddle.com/uploads/monthly_2022_12/image.png.242ac859fc95f971c58864db2ade2d3b.png

I like Vorhees and Mohamed the best.  believe it or not I don't see getting two tight ends.  tremble ain't no world beater but he still has room to grow.  Jalen Carter is a unstoppable force but another first round DT? A defensive end is more valuable than a rotational nose tackle.  sorry not sorry big JC isn't gonna play every down 350 pound men need a breather.  too much offense and  low value positions at premium spots.

not a fan dude.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, mickeye76 said:

I like Vorhees and Mohamed the best.  believe it or not I don't see getting two tight ends.  tremble ain't no world beater but he still has room to grow.  Jalen Carter is a unstoppable force but another first round DT? A defensive end is more valuable than a rotational nose tackle.  sorry not sorry big JC isn't gonna play every down 350 pound men need a breather.  too much offense and  low value positions at premium spots.

not a fan dude.   

Unto each their own. This was mostly done because the Panthers did do that all defense draft under Rhule.

The way that mock fell, there wasn't an early round DE available in the first either. So, I went with the guy that could make the biggest defensive impact. There was an LB available but I didn't want to take one that early and the two trade offers weren't worth it. Besides, it's always good to add to your lines.

As for the TEs, they were better than the WRs available and I'm not taking a running back before the fourth round. The value isn't there despite the draft rankings in today's NFL.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
×
×
  • Create New...