Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Post your 2023 Mocks/Simulations Here!


45catfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

Did a PFFer:

R1 Anthony Richardson QB Florida - Mega upside QB

R2 Dalton Kincaid TE Utah - Star TE

R3 Mazi Smith IDL Michigan - Monster next to Brown & Burns? Yes please

R3-4 Micah Baskerville LB LSU - Micah enters next to Luvu & Smith, Shaq exits

R3-4 Kenre Miller RB TCU - No problem in having him min RB3, competing for carries.  Have a committee like other good squads.

R4 Clayton Tune QB Houston - 2nd QB to see if there's a diamond here

R4-5 Malik Knowles WR KSU - One of the mid-round WRs I definitely like 

 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bear Hands said:

Did a PFFer:

R1 Anthony Richardson QB Florida - Mega upside QB

R2 Dalton Kincaid TE Utah - Star TE

R3 Mazi Smith IDL Michigan - Monster next to Brown & Burns? Yes please

R3-4 Micah Baskerville LB LSU - Micah enters next to Luvu & Smith, Shaq exits

R3-4 Kenre Miller RB TCU - No problem in having him min RB3, competing for carries.  Have a committee like other good squads.

R4 Clayton Tune QB Houston - 2nd QB to see if there's a diamond here

R4-5 Malik Knowles WR KSU - One of the mid-round WRs I definitely like 

 

Schitts Creek Comedy GIF by CBC

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The QBs were gone except for Levis in the first round, so I added a stud to the Dline in the first instead of risking the pick on Levis. Offense was the name of the game after that and I took a flyer on McKee in the 5th round to backup Corral and double dipped at TE and guard. Also took the best kicker left on the board in the 7th just to finally take a chance on a guy that could potentially hold down the spot for the next decade.

image.png.242ac859fc95f971c58864db2ade2d3b.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, jayboogieman said:

The QBs were gone except for Levis in the first round, so I added a stud to the Dline in the first instead of risking the pick on Levis. Offense was the name of the game after that and I took a flyer on McKee in the 5th round to backup Corral and double dipped at TE and guard. Also took the best kicker left on the board in the 7th just to finally take a chance on a guy that could potentially hold down the spot for the next decade.

/cdn-cgi/mirage/4713e9be4b843bf40ffb53dea3b7bef71d9fb426c5982a286c2618871506e4cd/1280/https://www.carolinahuddle.com/uploads/monthly_2022_12/image.png.242ac859fc95f971c58864db2ade2d3b.png

I like Vorhees and Mohamed the best.  believe it or not I don't see getting two tight ends.  tremble ain't no world beater but he still has room to grow.  Jalen Carter is a unstoppable force but another first round DT? A defensive end is more valuable than a rotational nose tackle.  sorry not sorry big JC isn't gonna play every down 350 pound men need a breather.  too much offense and  low value positions at premium spots.

not a fan dude.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, mickeye76 said:

I like Vorhees and Mohamed the best.  believe it or not I don't see getting two tight ends.  tremble ain't no world beater but he still has room to grow.  Jalen Carter is a unstoppable force but another first round DT? A defensive end is more valuable than a rotational nose tackle.  sorry not sorry big JC isn't gonna play every down 350 pound men need a breather.  too much offense and  low value positions at premium spots.

not a fan dude.   

Unto each their own. This was mostly done because the Panthers did do that all defense draft under Rhule.

The way that mock fell, there wasn't an early round DE available in the first either. So, I went with the guy that could make the biggest defensive impact. There was an LB available but I didn't want to take one that early and the two trade offers weren't worth it. Besides, it's always good to add to your lines.

As for the TEs, they were better than the WRs available and I'm not taking a running back before the fourth round. The value isn't there despite the draft rankings in today's NFL.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...