Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Spencer Rattler SC, lit up Tenn


SHU
 Share

Recommended Posts

18 hours ago, Snake said:

Lol you talk weak and play in the ACC. You guys are too scared to come to a real conference where you have to play real colleges not backwoods state every week. 

Dabo got a better record vs Bama and Ohio State than any coach in those 2 conferences.  

Big bad Georgia's toughest game last year was against a down Clemson team. 

SEC and the Big 10 got 2 teams each.   And they are great programs.  Then a bunch of slop teams in both conferences living off them and talking poo. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Snake said:

Please we just made a joke of the best offense in college and you think you still have a chance. Typical ACC mindset. 

I wish Clemson could trade the Gamecocks in for a real SEC team to play each year.    My kids have never even seen a Gamecock win over Clemson.   We should just be playing SC State each year if we trying to throw a bone to a local school. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, CRA said:

I wish Clemson could trade the Gamecocks in for a real SEC team to play each year.    My kids have never even seen a Gamecock win over Clemson.   We should just be playing SC State each year and if we trying to throw a bone to a local school. 

Well at least they got to see Clemson get a beating at the hands of Notre Dame on TV if they watched it a few weeks ago. If Clemson could somehow work their way back into the CFP (possibly could happen with some luck) they will more than likely get to see Clemson take another beating at the hands of one of the other three teams as well so there are good beatings of Clemson already seen and yet to be seen. They definitely had a great run but I have a feeling they wont be winning another national championship for many a year but will probably stay relevant and in the top 15 for awhile. I do always enjoy watching them lose though as I get so tired of seeing all their bandwagon fans who couldn't care less of them before they became great in the recent future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, YourLastThought said:

Well at least they got to see Clemson get a beating at the hands of Notre Dame on TV if they watched it a few weeks ago. If Clemson could somehow work their way back into the CFP (possibly could happen with some luck) they will more than likely get to see Clemson take another beating at the hands of one of the other three teams as well so there are good beatings of Clemson already seen and yet to be seen. They definitely had a great run but I have a feeling they wont be winning another national championship for many a year but will probably stay relevant and in the top 15 for awhile. I do always enjoy watching them lose though as I get so tired of seeing all their bandwagon fans who couldn't care less of them before they became great in the recent future.

all comes down to QB.  Got to have it.   Haven't had the play there 2 years running now.  

Really wish they would have just prepared and groomed the Cade kid all season.  Dabo too focused on proving folks wrong on DJ.  Football folks claimed Cade was a rare one coming out of HS.  But we realistically have seen him once all season get actual work. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, MillionDollarCam said:

I’m not sure if it’s still on Netflix, but there was a docuseries called QB1 that featured high profile high school QB’s, the most notable being Rattler, Fields, Hartman, Fromm, and Martell. I believe Rattler was on season three, any who, watching him on that show will make you despise him.

I’m sorry, but why would you want watch high school brats on TV? No thanks 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, top dawg said:

I get why you'd say that, but many many high schoolers are highly immature. I'd have to see what his level of maturity is now before I hold that against him.

I can understand that. 
 

Maybe he’s grown and matured, so yea, I can def see your line of thinking. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, AggieLean said:

I can understand that. 
 

Maybe he’s grown and matured, so yea, I can def see your line of thinking. 

 

He also came into an entirely new type of Offense for him. He'd never been asked to throw from the pocket before. He said it took him a few games into the season before he started getting comfortable.

 

By all accounts he has truly been a great teammate. And very coachable.

 

I know, I was surprised myself. I was excited to get him. But I was also extremely wary. Looks/acts like a different kid.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Call me crazy but if you’re in the bottom 7 in efficiency using Zone 84% of the time why not try something else? You paid Jaycee top 5 CB money use him more effectively. Zone is only efficient if you can generate a good pass rush to force a QB into mistakes otherwise you will get picked apart
    • Good Lord this board has become a cesspool of negativity and where fandom becomes something twisted and unrecognizable.  
    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
×
×
  • Create New...