Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who should we be looking at outside the "top 4" QB candidates?


rayzor
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

So you want the new HC to bank his entire first season on a 3rd round rookie that is on IR and looked bad in his limited playing time??  I get keeping him on the roster and letting him compete, but that is one hell of a gamble...

Bigger gamble to bank on someone who's a giant question mark. Corral has a year in the system with just about as much potential as everyone else outside of Young/Stroud. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Fright said:

Bigger gamble to bank on someone who's a giant question mark. Corral has a year in the system with just about as much potential as everyone else outside of Young/Stroud. 

Corral would have to learn a new system under the new coach just as the rookie would. But it’s still “what the coach wants”. If an amazing coach candidate comes in and says i want to coach corral i mean cool but that likely doesn’t happen is what is being said. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, micnificent28 said:

agreed... I don't think having Corral should negate or influence Travis as a potential selection. Even if we took say stroud in round 1. Travis as a backup taken in say the 6-7 isnt a bad idea. I think after this season we wipe the qb locker room clean.. Having 3 qbs compete for the spot of back and starter isnt a bad idea.

I don’t mind this. To me, after years and years of waiting, I am set on we need a round 1-2 QB now and if we want to take a chance on another guy in this draft as well thats fine by me. Worked for Washing when they got RGIII and Cousins. They just unfortunately hitched their wagon to the guy they ruined by playing him too hurt. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think if we miss out on Stroud, Young and Levis we are fugged in this draft anyway.  Maybe a reach for Richardson in the second.  Otherwise we should just build and wait

That said I think if at all possible we would spend whatever to move up and get 1 of those 3

Edited by Shocker
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/27/2022 at 8:59 AM, 45catfan said:

I have a co-worker that's a HUGE, HUGE Gators fan and he says Richardson has been saying behind the scenes he's probably returning next year, though obviously nothing official yet.

I’m on a million gator sites and circles for like 13 years now and the consensus almost everywhere behind the scenes was he was gone. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's rare enough for a running back to tear the same ACL twice. There's not much of a sample size on the recoveries. And of course Dobbins has missed a lot of time--he was injured twice. That number will drop as his career continues, and even if it doesn't, that doesn't necessarily mean it has anything to do with the prior injuries. Dobbins just started and played well for a playoff team all year until he was injured by a hip-drop tackle. Surely his ACL recoveries didn't contribute to his completely random foot injury caused by an illegal tackle? Again, I'm confused why everyone is being so definitive that there's 'very little chance' of any meaningful contribution ever when the greatest counterpoint ever played for us. Thomas Davis tore the same knee over and over again and was basically fine. As for the roster-building stuff, we'll see what happens with Chuba and Dowdle at the end of the year, but Etienne's not going to factor into this. Either Brooks comes back, in which case we've already seen more from him than we have from Etienne, or he doesn't. But Etienne's not forcing him off the team. If anything, Etienne's current role is his absolute floor.
    • Then I would assume disingenuous. Why on earth would you consider this an "exciting" time to be a Panthers fan? Let me ask this, how old are you and how long have you been an NFL fan?
    • An ESPN writer had a good breakdown of teams that were likely to come back to earth(KC and Redskins were two of them) based on outlier results in 2024 in close games. I think that has a lot to do with it. Found it: https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/46003861/nfl-teams-likely-decline-lose-more-games-2025-season-predictions-vikings-chiefs-commanders-lions-colts
×
×
  • Create New...