Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How good is Brian Burns 2022 campaign?


micnificent28
 Share

Recommended Posts

I'm dreading that Fitt is going to hand out a huge contract to Burns. If Fitt thinks Burns is worth more than two 1sts and a second, and that he's a cornerstone foundational player on this team, then Burns' agent is going to use that to break us. This upcoming contract is going to be outrageous, and Fitt is out of his fugging mind. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Toomers said:

I would take a 3rd round comp pick before paying Burns that much. 
 

  Reddick and Luvu armed/would be good deals. Both are much better players than I ever thought they were. And you could have both, plus 5M more for what Burns would make. 

 

 

I think he will demand 28 per, Im with you about the <3rd. 

Burns age is the big driving factor. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Basbear said:

I concur, do you think the figures are fair/accurate enough? would you change any?

 

I think Luvu may go a little higher since he's been balling out more than anyone else. He may not always show it in the stats, but his effort is undeniable. I think he gets 8.5 to 9.5 per for 3.

 Burns contract sounds about right, but guaranteed will be in the 90-100 range which is 18-20 per year for the 5 no matter if he blows his knee out the day after he signs. I hate big guarantees. 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, micnificent28 said:

lol im done after this.

If you would have done that 5 pages ago, you might have avoided actually making my argument for me. Now its sad because this has devolved into fanboys going 
 

86374BB4-1567-479F-9F7A-51B5FC6F1915.gif.ee749b07444f7abb831934e4024f6f0b.gif

 

   But I’m sure it will be fine. I’m never right when it comes to contracts and the Panthers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SmokinwithWilly said:

I think Luvu may go a little higher since he's been balling out more than anyone else. He may not always show it in the stats, but his effort is undeniable. I think he gets 8.5 to 9.5 per for 3.

 Burns contract sounds about right, but guaranteed will be in the 90-100 range which is 18-20 per year for the 5 no matter if he blows his knee out the day after he signs. I hate big guarantees. 

I think you make a good agent one for luvu, i think it could go higher. my only hang up was his age and fit....i swear hed make one hell of 3-4 edge, he just forces the SLB role to work..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Toomers said:

If you would have done that 5 pages ago, you might have avoided actually making my argument for me. Now its sad because this has devolved into fanboys going 
 

/cdn-cgi/mirage/eb4b7800d6d17865777269990e4c60773a92e17596980f93641413aba61e0565/1280/https://www.carolinahuddle.com/uploads/monthly_2022_12/86374BB4-1567-479F-9F7A-51B5FC6F1915.gif.ee749b07444f7abb831934e4024f6f0b.gif

 

   But I’m sure it will be fine. I’m never right when it comes to contracts and the Panthers. 

What argument have u made? you have made a completely dumb argument about letting a top 10 pass rusher walk for a complimentary 3 RD pick!  we were offered 2 first and a second and your saying it would be better to let him go for a borderline 4th rounder...i mean my god..

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, micnificent28 said:

What argument have u made? you have made a completely dumb argument about letting a top 10 pass rusher walk for a complimentary 3 RD pick!  we were offered 2 first and a second and your saying it would be better to let him go for a borderline 4th rounder...i mean my god..

 

That was a wild one. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nobody is giving up a 4th rounder for a backup QB And anyone who needs a starter badly enough to where Bryce would then be their starter, is such a bad team that they're not giving up a pick likely to be about pick 105ish overall, instead of just dealing with a bad QB situation for a season and then drafting one in a loaded QB draft next year. I'm looking through all the teams right now and can't think of a single one that would be willing to part with anything better than a 6th rounder. Barring injuries (and excluding the Panthers), there look to be 10 teams who don't know with 100% certainty who their starting QB will be in 2027... Dolphins, Jets, Browns, Steelers, Vikings, Colts, Saints, Falcons, Cardinals, and Rams. Of those 10...  The Rams know it will be Stafford or Simpson.  The Saints more than likely will be sticking with Shough unless he takes a huge step backwards.  So neither are giving up any draft picks for Bryce right now, just wouldn't make sense for either. Down to 8 Given their current QB situation of having multiple QBs they already need to evaluate between this year, the Browns (Shedeur/Watson), Vikings (Kyler/JJ), Colts (Jones/Richardson/Leonard), and Falcons (Penix/Tua), wouldn't be giving up a 4th (or maybe any pick) to bring in another QB to muddy the waters even more. Down to 4 Dolphins just signed Willis and wouldn't want to bring in another small Alabama QB who has struggled after just dumping Tua instead of just rolling with Ewers as the backup.   That then leaves the Steelers, Cardinals, and Jets left as it's clear none of them have any idea who their 2027 could be as of right now.  But the Steelers would for sure rather just see what one of the 2 QB's they drafted in the last 2 drafts could become than give up a mid round pick for Bryce.  Same goes for the Cardinals in taking Beck this past weekend. The Jets would be the most likely team to even consider taking him on, but I think it seems very apparent right now given them rolling with Geno and now talk of bringing in Wilson to be his backup, they're punting on QB this year to draft someone next year, so why give up even a mid round pick for Bryce?
    • Honestly I am not sure Pickett couldn’t step in for him. But I don’t see a clear easy upgrade and we are not KC with Alex Smith we are a team that hadn’t done poo for almost ten years and just made the playoffs. And looked good in the game. That stadium atmosphere on that day…. you know Tepper ate that poo up. Not one drink has been thrown in a while.  You had better make sure if you replaced him after that that you had a sure fire upgrade. 
    • Makes sense. If Bryce is ass this year, we are probably drafting our new QB next draft and sitting him behind Bryce for a year
×
×
  • Create New...