Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Steve Wilks refutes the media's perception that the Panthers "tried to tank this year"


Saca312
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

I've posted the link above already.  And I linked that tweet you posted a while ago explaining it was missing the context of the earlier questions.

Yeah.  I call BS.  He doesn't say anything about outside perception or outside chatter leading up to the comment, or in the follow up question.

Looks to me like Kunkel got this one right.

  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, poundaway said:

Yeah.  I call BS.  He doesn't say anything about outside perception or outside chatter leading up to the comment, or in the follow up question.

Looks to me like Kunkel got this one right.

Uh he definitely does. He starts the q&a talking about things outside their play that is distracting and when a reporter asks what he meant by tanking directly he says he meant things being said outside the organization 

His whole thing is this is big for the players because they ignored the noise and performed as he felt they could

Edited by mav1234
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, poundaway said:

Ok, now I call BS.  He very clearly was NOT refering to outside perceptions.  He listed HC changes, players losses and that the org was trying to tank it.

He clearly asks it as a rhetorical question meaning it’s a question that was coming from the outside, “are the organization trying to tank it” is exactly what was said.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MillionDollarCam said:

He clearly asks it as a rhetorical question meaning it’s a question that was coming from the outside, “are the organization trying to tank it” is exactly what was said.

He clarified later he was talking about things said outside too

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Move the Panthers to Raleigh said:

If we lose draft picks because of this, I may just walk out on this team

We won't. He very clearly said afterwards he meant things around the team, not from inside.

There's no way you can look at this team and think it's tanking. What decisions were made to do so?  Trading away our best offensive player? Ok, but he may have lowkey requested a trade (esp given where he ended up), and we had good backs behind him.  Refusing the Burns trade is 100% strong evidence we weren't trying to tank, as was firing Rhule.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, poundaway said:

He did backpedal 5-6 questions later.

Believe what you want, you're going to anyway.

Wilks brought up tanking, not the media as you try to portray it.

He clarified, it isn't backpedaling. His first like minute was all about the distractions players have to deal with and how they have to focus. I don't know what to tell you, we just disagree.

So give me the examples of this team trying to tank?  He didn't have any because he said they weren't, but you apparently know they did, so I'd like to hear your rationale.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

He clearly asks it as a rhetorical question meaning it’s a question that was coming from the outside, “are the organization trying to tank it” is exactly what was said.

There's no "the" there.

I could give you "Are our organization trying to tank it?"

But to me it sounds like "Our..our organization trying to tank it."

Either way he wasn't asked about tanking.  He listed HC and player changes and then talked about tanking.  He did backpedal 5-6 questions later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • FLA showed everyone it’s not about superstars. they bullied the best line in the NHL into obscurity. they played hard, were in the right positions, and ran over everything that got in their way.
    • That’s really not what you said and when I even expressed doubt as to your intentions with the post you doubled down and remained unclear on whether you were trying to drag Dean Smith for whatever reason. You just got the facts wrong, which if you don’t follow the local college programs like you say then maybe you just were mistaken and thought Smith didn’t win championships or have legit superstars, and that is ok, but you just doubled down when my first post was more corrective than anything. I’m not sure what you expect posting objectively false things like “RBA has a lot of wins with nothing to show for it like Dean Smith” (paraphrasing) on a message board with plenty of UNC fans. I’m not taking it as a personal affront, we can agree to disagree, Dean Smith’s legacy fortunately will not be affected by this conversation. Screw the (Florida) Panthers?
    • Bring in the free agents and trades.  Florida is the best team and unless Tulsky makes it happen, it’s more of the same…which isn’t bad…but it’s time to win a goddamn cup. 
×
×
  • Create New...