Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jaycee Horn


SZ James (banned)
 Share

Recommended Posts

54 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

I'll always root for Bradberry.

Dude did nothing but improve year over year. He walked, got paid, and has maintained that high level of play.

Honestly hope he wins one with the iggles this year if they make it to the superb owl.

Yeah he was a true pro throughout his time here, great Gettleman pick

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Aussie Tank said:

Imagine a true ball hawk safety in the guts of this secondary 

Definitely,  I really wish they would stop this Chinn as coverage safety experiment.   He made a couple really good plays on the ball last game but most plays they were picking on him.  Hes an ok player in coverage and a great one in the box, I have no idea what they're thinking besides the fact Wilks has always been the one adamant about him playing coverage safety.

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Ricky Spanish said:

I'll always root for Bradberry.

Dude did nothing but improve year over year. He walked, got paid, and has maintained that high level of play.

Honestly hope he wins one with the iggles this year if they make it to the superb owl.

I always thought he would be a good extension.  The CB's who flash and get 9 picks sound nice...but gimme JB...just never allows completions, doesn't miss games, and doesn't get in trouble on or off the field.

Great Pro.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Around the 11:15 mark, I think I see what triggered the unsportsmanlike penalty on Canales. I'm not overly familiar with sideline rules but that seemed really ticky tacky. 
    • The crux of the issue is figuring out if he can be more consistent will cost us more. A lot more. The options as I see them now: Trade him Pro: We get something in return. No further financial liability.  Con: We must find a new guy + backup via FA/draft and they may not be cheap and/or could be worse than Young (see McCarthy). Young could be the next Darnold/Mayfield on another team, which means it's an organizational issue with (lack of) QB development. Fifth Year - No extension Pro: Gives us more time to evaluate and build up roster. Have a natural exit plan if he doesn't pan out.  Con: We get nothing for him in return if we let him go. We risk a Daniel Jones scenario where Bryce plays lights out, skyrocketing the cost of his extension. Extend now Pro: Provides stability for the near future. May be able to get a more reasonable contract number now since his stats don't scream franchise QB yet and/or structure it to where we give ourselves an out. Con: Bryce's agent demands whatever CJ Stroud will end up getting. We're hitching our wagon to him for at least a year or two. Cost of getting out of the contract. Likely ties Canales' fate to Young.
    • I hope Wallace can develop but he's a liability as a starting LB at this point. He didn't take the rookie to sophomore leap I was hoping he would. 
×
×
  • Create New...