Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Attacking “glass half full” posters after a loss…


Wundrbread33
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

My only problem with the tanking crowd isn't that they don't want to win, it's the belief that it is at all likely that the team would deliberately put itself in a position to do so - coaches and players are fighting for their next contract, if not their pride, and while most of us know how the playoffs are likely to go even if they happen (one of the teams in this division has to win it lol), that chance alone will inspire the team. 

I don't begrudge people for seeing tanking as a path to success, and don't think the difference in opinion deserves a personal attack. Lots of personal attacks these days (I'm sure I'm not innocent of that either).  Losing for so long saps a lot of the positivity out of the fan base.

Did the team look inspired to you yesterday?

  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Did the team look inspired to you yesterday?

Do you really think they've quit? 

They were out coached, but I think most still played hard. They were not put in a position to succeed tho.

Anyway inspire in this context was used to talk about deliberately losing/tanking - it's very hard to deliberately tank in the NFL. "luckily" for those interested in draft position this team isn't exactly good enough or coached will enough to win consistently.

Edited by mav1234
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mav1234 said:

Do you really think they've quit? 

They were out coached, but I think most still played hard. They were not put in a position to succeed tho.

Thats 2 different things.  They didnt quit but they certainly were out hustled, out coached and didnt have any sense of urgency.  The oline in particular and most certainly brown and burns.  The pff grades are going to be interesting once they start dropping.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

Thats 2 different things.  They didnt quit but they certainly were out hustled, out coached and didnt have any sense of urgency.  The oline in particular and most certainly brown and burns.  The pff grades are going to be interesting once they start dropping.

So you think yesterday was deliberately tanking?  Or are you just upset with a particular word choice? It's pretty clear to me they aren't tanking and haven't quit, and still believe they have a shot at the playoffs.  Your opinion may differ.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mav1234 said:

So you think yesterday was deliberately tanking?  Or are you just upset with a particular word choice? It's pretty clear to me they aren't tanking and haven't quit, and still believe they have a shot at the playoffs.  Your opinion may differ.

How do you get that from my post?   That’s not what I am even remotely saying.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

How do you get that from my post?   That’s not what I am even remotely saying.  

I don't have any clue what you are saying. You asked if I thought the team looked inspired when I was using the word to explain why they weren't going to deliberately tank.  I do think that the hope of the playoffs has inspired a change in the team compared to when Rhule was in charge, it doesn't mean the team played "an inspired" game or something.

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

So you think yesterday was deliberately tanking?  Or are you just upset with a particular word choice? It's pretty clear to me they aren't tanking and haven't quit, and still believe they have a shot at the playoffs.  Your opinion may differ.

I think he is saying Wilks may not have these great motivational skills people are claiming he does.  Sure they were fired up for a few games (probably because Rhule was gone), but in a game where you are getting outcoached and no adjustments are made, it's hard for players to stay super pumped/motivated.  They can only ride they wave for so long IMO.  Preparation, adjustment, playing your roster to it's strengths can go much longer than simply trying to pump up your players.  

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The moral to this thread is simple: man up. Stop being butthurt no matter which side you're on in a debate. If someone gives you a hard time for being positive after a loss ... get over it. If someone questions your sanity for hoping we lose every game ... get over it.

High Five Best Friends GIF by reactionseditor

Edited by Brooklyn 3.0
  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

I think he is saying Wilks may not have these great motivational skills people are claiming he does.  Sure they were fired up for a few games (probably because Rhule was gone), but in a game where you are getting outcoached and no adjustments are made, it's hard for players to stay super pumped/motivated.  They can only ride they wave for so long IMO.  Preparation, adjustment, playing your roster to it's strengths can go much longer than simply trying to pump up your players.  

In that case I agree with him, haha.

Oh by no means do I think Wilks is exceptional as... Well anything... I do not want him back. In the wider scheme of the year I think it's blind to say the team isn't playing harder for him than Rhule but that's all relative. And it doesn't matter if Wilks is better than Rhule. We need more than that. 

I do think the players kept fighting but I personally think yesterday was less about their own personal motivation and more being outschemed and outmuscled. They got shoved around and outplayed. We made no adjustments. It was like a Rivera team all over again.

The inspired word choice was about why the team wasn't going to just give up and/or tank either. 

Edited by mav1234
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

I think he is saying Wilks may not have these great motivational skills people are claiming he does.  Sure they were fired up for a few games (probably because Rhule was gone), but in a game where you are getting outcoached and no adjustments are made, it's hard for players to stay super pumped/motivated.  They can only ride they wave for so long IMO.  Preparation, adjustment, playing your roster to it's strengths can go much longer than simply trying to pump up your players.  

exactly, thanks for this.  And it was evidenced by how frustrated the team was getting all game.  Tomlin and his staff put on a clinic.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

exactly, thanks for this.  And it was evidenced by how frustrated the team was getting all game.  Tomlin and his staff put on a clinic.

That I agree with - my post wasn't about one game but the wider context is all, but may not have been clear. Sorry if that was confusing - that's why I asked if you thought they were tanking.

It's hard / impossible to truly tank in the NFL intentionally, but at least having a bad coaching staff gets you part way there 🤷

Edited by mav1234
  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean…sometimes the other guys just have your number. We lost the trenches yesterday. The Steelers did what we try to do, but did it to us, and they did it better. 
 

McAdoo is bad. Sam needs to game manage at best. He’s playing like a solid backup should. We can’t get behind in a game. 
 

The team, however, responded well after the Bengals ass whooping. Let’s see how they respond to a similar ass whooping, not in score, but in the trenches. 
 

It’s not a certainty they were uninspired just because they got beat. poo happens. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MasterAwesome said:

I dunno why you're sneaking Fields into this discussion considering he was available at our draft slot lol.  Ironically if anything, you could argue that had we won one more game in 2020, that Horn/Surtain would have been gone (Dallas was rumored to be high on one of the top two corners) and we might have actually ended up taking Fields instead.

Not sneaking him in at all. I brought him up because he’s a young QB we passed on. We have made terrible decisions regarding QBs for the longest time. We have wasted a lot of picks and resources into going after guys who aren’t good. It’s time to take a chance on a rookie first rounder. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I thought he had a few really nice flashes.  I can see him showing out this year 
    • I have heard that before--when standing in front of a full body mirror at Old Navy.  I said it, actually. Seriously, Let's go on what we know. There is reason for optimism that exceeds random opinions and negativity: 1. Last year, the offense was the priority and the interior offensive line was the focal point. Morgan addressed it in free agency and the draft. They improved.  2.  Last year, Canales pulled Young after 2 games and replaced him with an established veteran.  Instead of giving up on Young, he developed him, primarily focusing on his footwork and timing.  Continued development in his fundamentals should result in improved play.  (this is significant because some athletes rely on natural ability and do not adapt well.  They resort to old habits. This means that Bryce is "teachable" and is willing to face adversity and fight through it.  That is what you want in a QB.) 3. Morgan drafted a raw talent at WR; and we all knew he was raw.  Huddlers are already calling it a bust, but his productivity numbers were in line with the other WRs drafted around where he was drafted.  So, yes, he was a bit disappointing, but what part of "Raw" is not understood here?  Evil Bryce, then inconsistent Dalton, then good Bryce--all while facing the top defensive backs--and let's not forget about his lingering injuries--and we should understand XL's productivity.  Morgan was looking for a home run based on XL's 1-season productivity and his freakish athleticism, but I always thought we would not know what we have until year 2.  TMac alone will make XL better--a solid #2. 4.  If you blame Morgan for drafting XL, you must give him credit for making Coker a priority free agent.  In my view, he addressed WR in 2024 pretty effectively in the long view.  5.  Let's look at the rest of the draft.  Brooks?  The best RB in the draft in round 2?  Morgan was attempting to build a solid run game behind Bryce.  Wallace was a very solid third round pick at LB. Sanders is a strong TE for a fourth round pick. 6.  Not much is being said about the development of Chau Smith-Wade.  His improvement mirrors Bryce Young's, actually.  In his first 8 games, his PFF rating was 36.5.  In the final 9 games, his PFF rating was 66.7.   7.  With so many needs, Morgan hit the UDFA market with success. In addition to Coker, Demani Richardson got 400+ snaps and had a 60.1 PFF grade, including an interception. 8.  In free agency, Morgan spent big bucks on Guards, a move that made his QB better. He added David Moore, Nijman,  He signed Clowney, Wonnum, Robinson, Jewel, Chaisson, Fuller, Scott, D. Jackson, Dionte Johnson, etc.  A few years of Fitterer left him with more holes that players.  Some did not work out, but he did all this on a budget (after he splurged on Lewis and Hunt).  It is hard to get a free agent to come to a team that loses--so in some cases, Morgan had to overpay or accept questionable players. Morgan's first year as a GM demonstrated an understanding of the game like we have not seen since Polian, before his lost it. Canales, on the other hand, should be rated by the improvement of players.  Zavala, Ekwonu, Mays, Young, Smith-Wade, Coker, Wallace--all improved.  He had to overcome major losses such as D. Brown, Shaq, Dionte Johnson, Corbett--and we saw growth.  Despite all this team went through, after 8 games of disarray, This team finished 4-5 with close losses to both Super Bowl teams.  Frankly, I do not know how he did it. This year was better.  The WR room is solid with depth.  The OL room is solid with depth.  The TE room is as good as it has been in a while.  The RB room has the potential to be as good as it was when we had 28 and 34.  DBs?  Better.  DL?  Better.  Edge?  better.  The bottom of the roster?  Much better. We really don't know what we have yet, and that makes this offseason exciting.      
    • Here you go. 2 yards. Bryce Sneak.mp4
×
×
  • Create New...