Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The competent thing to do.


1of10Charnatives
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

At least you tried something different. Leaving Evans singled up was begging to lose. Try to find other instances in the NFL where a single receiver has 3 DEEP TDs against single man coverage. It's rare for multiple reasons but one of the key ones is that you're gonna stop leaving that guy on an island because you realize that isn't working.

And Evans knew it. He was calling for the ball right after the snap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Try to find other instances in the NFL where a single receiver has 3 DEEP TDs against single man coverage. It's rare for multiple reasons but one of the key ones is that you're gonna stop leaving that guy on an island because you realize that isn't working.

Definitely seen plenty of games where a single receiver killed an opposing defense, sometimes even a good defense.

Hell, Steve Smith "happening" to a dominant Bears defense in 2003 was as good as anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Definitely seen plenty of games where a single receiver killed an opposing defense, sometimes even a good defense.

Hell, Steve Smith "happening" to a dominant Bears defense in 2003 was as good as anything.

But was it all from deep shot 9 routes? That's the thing. That specifically is something relatively easy to negate by rolling a safety over the top. If a guy is carving you up all over the field with a whole route tree that's a lot tougher to deal with.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

But was it all from deep shot 9 routes? That's the thing. That specifically is something relatively easy to negate by rolling a safety over the top. If a guy is carving you up all over the field with a whole route tree that's a lot tougher to deal with.

Smith scored on plays of 58 and 39 yards in that game. I remember one being a sideline go route. Don't remember the other and stat summaries typically don't list what route a player scored on, but Smith "happened" to a lot of teams that same way.

As far as yesterday, our safeties were Jeremy Chinn, Xavier Woods and TJ Carrie. I'm not sure any one of them, including Chinn, makes a big difference yesterday.

I get what you're saying. I just don't think it would have mattered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, The Lobo said:

Side note: I still think they should have went for it both times on 4th and short. I know on the first one TB didn’t score, but anytime we can keep the ball away from Brady, I’m all for it.

Failing to go for it was one of those "safe" moves that in reality wasn't safe. If you think merely making Brady cover an extra 30-40 yards was your best bet when deciding what to do on 4th and short, I question your competence as an NFL coach. This is dinosaur level thinking from a bygone football era that essentially shifts blame away from the coach not having the guts to go for it, and onto the players for being unable to do things they're physically incapable of doing.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, frankw said:

The Niners gave up 400 yards of offense and 3 touchdowns to Jarrett Stidham yesterday and had to take it to overtime to put the Raiders away. There is no path to the playoffs where you are going to win with an offense putting up less than 30 points.

To some degree I'm with you, but let's tone down the hyperbole so it doesn't become misinformation.  No team is averaging 30 points a game this year. None. Zero.

Only 7 teams are averaging more than 25 points a game. 14 teams make the playoffs and Green Bay with the 14th most prolific offense in the league this year is averaging 22 points a game.

The 14th best scoring defense (NO) is giving up just a hair under 21 points a game.

A more accurate statement would be to say you need to consistently score more than 20 while having a D good enough to keep your opponents to about that or less.

Btw, the best scoring defense is giving up 16.5 and the best scoring offense is averaging 29. That means the spread from 14th best to best for both offense and defense is a handful of points.

Ultimately is it a league in which you can win championships anymore by having a dominant defense and a middle of the road offense? i agree the answer to that is no, I just wanna be a little more realistic about the actual numbers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

At least you tried something different. Leaving Evans singled up was begging to lose. Try to find other instances in the NFL where a single receiver has 3 DEEP TDs against single man coverage. It's rare for multiple reasons but one of the key ones is that you're gonna stop leaving that guy on an island because you realize that isn't working.

True. I don't even think I've seen Tyreke Hill score on three different go routes in one game. That was just some college sh*t that we witnessed.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, parker said:

Then the posts would be, "why didn't we double team Godwin. We failed to adjust to stop him."

I think this gets to a core reason why conservative coaches throw up their hands and go down with the ship even though they know it won't work. It's not about giving yourself some chance, however slight, by going on it on 4th and short at midfield, or doubling up the WR eating you alive right now, or blitzing every play even though you know it's dicey.

It's about doing the "safe" expected thing rather than trying something radical that might give you a tiny bit better chance because as the coach you tend to get less criticism directed at you when you do the expected thing. When you go for it and take the nontraditional approach, if it doesn't work, fans will second guess it.

The coach I want for my team does the thing that gives his team the best chance to win, even knowing sometimes that the increased chance is tiny and more likely to cause shade to be thrown his way, but prioritizes winning over avoiding criticism, because criticism is just part of the gig at the NFL level.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Castavar said:

True. I don't even think I've seen Tyreke Hill score on three different go routes in one game. That was just some college sh*t that we witnessed.

Yeah, like I said I'd have a lot more sympathy if he was just carving us up all over the field with a variety of routes. That's hard to stop. But when a guy is simply running past your CBs and catching bombs put a fuging safety over the top already. That's not rocket science. That's defensive football 101 and is a big black eye for Wilks who is supposed to not only be a defensive specialist but a secondary specialist.

 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 1of10Charnatives said:

To some degree I'm with you, but let's tone down the hyperbole so it doesn't become misinformation.  No team is averaging 30 points a game this year. None. Zero.

Only 7 teams are averaging more than 25 points a game. 14 teams make the playoffs and Green Bay with the 14th most prolific offense in the league this year is averaging 22 points a game.

The 14th best scoring defense (NO) is giving up just a hair under 21 points a game.

A more accurate statement would be to say you need to consistently score more than 20 while having a D good enough to keep your opponents to about that or less.

Btw, the best scoring defense is giving up 16.5 and the best scoring offense is averaging 29. That means the spread from 14th best to best for both offense and defense is a handful of points.

Ultimately is it a league in which you can win championships anymore by having a dominant defense and a middle of the road offense? i agree the answer to that is no, I just wanna be a little more realistic about the actual numbers.

Regular season no but entering the postseason and beyond you want to be scoring minimum 3 touchdowns to give yourself a chance. The Niners and Eagles look to be the teams to beat in the NFC and they have given up their share of points. But they can get on the board when they need to. We can't. There are different reasons for that beginning with different needs like a real tight end. But our QB turning the ball over was the difference maker in the loss yesterday IMO. Brock Purdy played better than our starter. We need to leave no stone unturned in the offseason in our search for QB and it begins with the draft. I'll keep banging that 🥁 🫡

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, frankw said:

Why do so many people on this board think other teams aren't going to score? Even good defenses are giving up 30 points this is the NFL if you want to be relevant your offense has to go toe to toe and not kick field goals. I'm over the defensive identity of this team. I want to build a juggernaut offense.

Improvement in the passing game is definitely needed.  I personally don’t think this OL is completely done with upgrades yet either.  TE is a glaring need
 

We also need a CB for depth and Edge rusher.  

Edited by Shocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, frankw said:

Regular season no but entering the postseason and beyond you want to be scoring minimum 3 touchdowns to give yourself a chance. The Niners and Eagles look to be the teams to beat in the NFC and they have given up their share of points. But they can get on the board when they need to. We can't. There are different reasons for that beginning with different needs like a real tight end. But our QB turning the ball over was the difference maker in the loss yesterday IMO. Brock Purdy played better than our starter. We need to leave no stone unturned in the offseason in our search for QB and it begins with the draft. I'll keep banging that 🥁 🫡

Brother I am with you on the need for a TE. Top TE's take good offenses to the next level. I agree that no one should expect to win a playoff game with less than 3 touchdowns. The subpar offenses have been weeded out at that point. I'm not 100% on going after QB this offseason because the draft class doesn't wow me. I think getting a top flight pass rusher and maybe that TE are priorities too and live with Sam another year while building the team around him, then going after your preferred target in next year's draft could be another option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, 1of10Charnatives said:

Brother I am with you on the need for a TE. Top TE's take good offenses to the next level. I agree that no one should expect to win a playoff game with less than 3 touchdowns. The subpar offenses have been weeded out at that point. I'm not 100% on going after QB this offseason because the draft class doesn't wow me. I think getting a top flight pass rusher and maybe that TE are priorities too and live with Sam another year while building the team around him, then going after your preferred target in next year's draft could be another option.

We got really lucky when we fleeced the Bears for Olsen. But as for this or next years class of quarterbacks you could make the argument any season that it isn't an ideal time. Next years class seems to be the mantra around these parts but when next year rolls around we start loafing around going "ehhhhh idk" haha. We do have extra picks so if a guy falls and we want to roll the dice I'll accept that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...