Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Harbaugh to Carolina Makes Too Much Sense...


chknwing
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, 1of10Charnatives said:

I'm with Fu that Harbaugh is the most attractive option out there but likely wears out his welcome half dozen years down the road give or take. I'm willing to live with that at this point if he can change the culture of this place to something that wins more consistently, but am extremely leary of giving full control to any HC.

It just never works in the modern NFL. The job is too big for any one man. You need a fully empowered GM to run the FO, not a HC's puppet.

Yeah, you can't pursue Harbaugh blindly. He may have conditions that just make him not an option for us, even if he is generally the best possible coach available. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Remember who own the Broncos now.  Tepper could get outbid.  The old Broncos owners could not have got into a bidding war with Tepper, the Waltons, however...they have money to burn.

I really don't think it's going to boil down to money. It's going to be who meets whatever personnel or FO demands that Harbaught has and what is the better situation for him. Any of these teams interested will pay whatever he wants.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I honestly don't want him.

Yes he was an NFL coach for a period of time, but he has been in college for a good bit now, and with that comes the megalomania of being a college coach.

I don't want that personality around this team anymore. 

I think he'd want too much control and I don't trust him. He is constantly leveraging against Michigan to get more money out of them. It's the same slimey stuff that Rhule did. 

No thanks.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I think if you go Harbaugh it's with the full knowledge that he is probably here at most 5-6 years. But, if you get a ring in that timespan, it was worth it. Or, really, if we are a consistent 10+ win team. At least then we are a very attractive option for the next round of coaching hires.

I do think he will wear out his welcome no matter where he goes.

I would be fine with Harbaugh staying here 5-6 years because the average tenure for an NFL coach is approximately just 3.2 years.

Several head coaches have already lost their jobs, with at least a few more firings expected later.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Remember who own the Broncos now.  Tepper could get outbid.  The old Broncos owners could not have got into a bidding war with Tepper, the Waltons, however...they have money to burn.

It may not be just about the money though.  He would be inheriting a train wreck.  A QB that still calls offensive plays from the Seahawks, who is over paid and currently can't hit the broad side of a barn...on top of that, with a contract that makes him a fixture for the organization for a few years.  Competition in the division, especially with what I mentioned above, also makes it unattractive for a coach that will probably have his pick of teams.  Money is an object, for sure, but it may not be the only thing he will be looking at

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

The concern is that he might be a "complete control" coach again. If that is the case, I am not sure I want him. 

He is easily the most accomplished coach available this cycle but we just got over that kind of thing. I don't think I want to make that mistake again.

Some of the best coaches in the entire league have been full control guys -- Belichick, Reid, Carroll...

The issue wasn't giving a coach full control, it was who we gave it to. Harbaugh already has a proven track record of significant NFL success, I would have zero hesitations giving him whatever he wanted and letting him run things.

  • Pie 6
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Yeah, you can't pursue Harbaugh blindly. He may have conditions that just make him not an option for us, even if he is generally the best possible coach available. 

You are 100% correct. The conditions he could expect might very well be a big show stopper to his hiring.

Tepper and the other interested owners would have to decide if those conditions were reasonable before talking about a serious contract offer.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m not sold on Harbaugh, there’s numerous questions surrounding his overall ability to work well with others (among other things).

When Harbaugh moved on from the 49ers it was reported by Business Insider that he had a horrible relationship with San Francisco’s front office and then Rapoport and Deion Sanders reported that a lot of of the veteran players on the 49ers had issues with Harbaugh.

Then you get into the fact that the guy just can’t seem the finish (yes, I know I sound like Steve Wilks). He’s gone 2-7 in bowl games and couldn’t bring a Super Bowl to San Francisco despite compiling a record of 44-19-1.

Finally, you have the pure coaching aspect, he’s supposed to be an offensive coach, so make these numbers make sense.

San Francisco’s Total Offense Rankings During Harbaugh’s Tenure

2011 - 26th

2012 - 11th

2013 - 24th

2014 - 20th

So what exactly are you getting with Harbaugh? An offensive coach that can’t… coach offense?

Edited by MillionDollarCam
  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, t96 said:

Some of the best coaches in the entire league have been full control guys -- Belichick, Reid, Carroll...

The issue wasn't giving a coach full control, it was who we gave it to. Harbaugh already has a proven track record of significant NFL success, I would have zero hesitations giving him whatever he wanted and letting him run things.

Technically, Carroll doesn't have complete control in Seattle but I get what you mean.

I am just not sure Harbaugh is the guy I want with complete control. I am not convinced that is a good idea.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, WarPanthers89 said:

Do not want. He seems to be a tool and they had very mixed reports when he left the 49ers. I know a lot of you are Harbaugh stans but this is just my opinion. I want a current NFL coach. 

He's absolutely a tool and a douche but he's not pure scum cheater like Belichick, Payton and outside of significant issues like that (or off field) all I care about is winning, which Harbaugh does. We've had a "family" culture our entire history, how has it worked out? I'd much rather have a coach who pisses off some of his players while we win than a coach like Wilks who every single player loves but we are mediocre. To win in this league you have to make incredibly difficult decisions, and that is going to piss some people off and rub people the wrong way.

  • Pie 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Technically, Carroll doesn't have complete control in Seattle but I get what you mean.

I am just not sure Harbaugh is the guy I want with complete control. I am not convinced that is a good idea.

pretty sure Carroll has final say over the roster, that's really all that matters in terms of having control

 

https://www.seattletimes.com/sports/seahawksrsquo-pete-carroll-now-a-super-bowl-coach-reflects-on-time-with-jets/

 

relevant quote from the article:

Quote

In Seattle, Carroll has the final say on all football personnel matters. He looks back at the lack of control he had with the Jets and now calls it “an interim type of situation.”

 

Edited by t96
  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

I’m not sold on Harbaugh, there’s numerous questions surrounding his overall ability to work well with others (among other things).

When Harbaugh moved on from the 49ers it was reported by Business Insider that he had a horrible relationship with San Francisco’s front office and then Rapoport and Deion Sanders reported that a lot of of the veteran players on the 49ers had issues with Harbaugh.

Then you get into the fact that the guy just can’t seem the finish (yes, I know I sound like Steve Wilks). He’s gone 2-7 in bowl games and couldn’t bring a Super Bowl to San Francisco despite compiling a record of 44-19-1.

Finally, you have the pure coaching aspect, he’s supposed to be an offensive coach, so make these numbers make sense.

San Francisco’s Total Offense Rankings During Harbaugh’s Tenure

2011 - 26th

2012 - 11th

2013 - 24th

2014 - 20th

So what exactly are you getting with Harbaugh? An offensive coach that can’t… coach offense?

I think something we all need to immediately throw out the window is what he did in college. That applies to his previous and current college head coaching gigs. College football so vastly different that you may as well consider it Major League Soccer. It genuinely has absolutely nothing to do with NFL success(or lack thereof).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Remember who own the Broncos now.  Tepper could get outbid.  The old Broncos owners could not have got into a bidding war with Tepper, the Waltons, however...they have money to burn.

Coaching contracts aren't in the billions, they're in the millions, and relatively low millions at that. Any NFL owner can pay Harbaugh big money. It's not a matter of money, it's a matter of will. It's a matter of other things like control, power and length of contract. The owners will be thinking about perception and value as well. They don't want to look like fools by overpaying. They'll only go so far. Tepper has already proven that he's willing to go outside the norms to get his guy. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, t96 said:

pretty sure Carroll has final say over the roster, that's really all that matters in terms of having control

 

https://www.seattletimes.com/sports/seahawksrsquo-pete-carroll-now-a-super-bowl-coach-reflects-on-time-with-jets/

Okay, I wasn't aware he had that. Especially with a guy like Schneider being there.

Which, in reality, even complete control is still a collaborative effort. Being a full time HC and full time GM is too big of a job for anyone, really.

Fitterer already signed up with that as his deal so I doubt there would be much of an adjustment there.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We also have to consider cause and effect.  Maybe the reason we don't target TEs is not by design, it is due to personnel.  If we are going to use 12 (2 TEs) and 13 (3 TEs) sets to improve the run game, we need some TE options.  It is ridiculous to think we can do that without TEs who can run the seams and move the chains in the pass game.  I think that is the plan folks.  We ran 3 TEs about 1 in 12 plays last year, and we did not have the TE personnel to do that as effectively as needed.  If we had better TEs, we might run 3 TE sets more--say 10%, and 2 TE sets 20% of the time.  You always need the pass option when you do this, and frankly, nobody was scared with Tremble, Evans, and Sanders out there.  It is an area they are likely to address. 
    • Conspiracy theory:  They only spoke to one TE (based on the list I saw) and it was Joly.  They are telling us:  If we draft a TE, it will be day 3, and it will be Joly or we will stay with what we have.  
    • THE WALKER BACKGROUND Here is where this gets weird.  Walker is a serviceable LT who could benefit from Gilbert's experience and coaching.  However, he is known for below-average run blocking and frequent penalties.  As you know, a penalty from a LT is a drive killer. A former 7th round pick, Walker has outperformed expectations, but he still ranks around the middle of the pack when compared to other tackles.  Having said that, it seems as if the Panthers are banking on Walker for a year and will then make a decision on Ickey.  In Green Bay, Walker was the starter, but the Packers weren't exactly sold on him. While most people think the oft-injured David Bakhtiari retired in 2023, he really wanted to keep playing.  He was released on March, 11, 2024.  Walker stepped in and took the reserve LT job from Nijman in that 2023 season, but they were close--probably because Nijman was more of a swing OT.  However, Nijman was a free agent in 2024, so the Panthers signed him just a week after Bakhtiari was released, leaving the Packers only Walker to play LT.  A month later, the Packers drafted a LT in the first round, Jordan Morgan out of Arizona.  Most Packer fans believe that Morgan would have beat out Walker for the LT job in 2024, but he had some shoulder injuries and went to IR after 6 games. In 2025, when the Packers had an injury at G during the season, instead of putting Morgan in at LT for Walker as planned, they played Morgan to guard because Walker can only play 1 position.  The Packers currently project Morgan back to LT for 2026, which is probably why they did not seek to retain Walker, at least in part. Based on this history, it is safe to say this: Walker is better than Nijman. We have the benefit of them being on the same team in a direct competition to help us see that. Walker is probably closer to Ickey, except for the penalties.  That bothers me a lot.  Bryce sucks when we get behind the sticks, and a run-first offense with a poor run-blocking LT is not ideal.   Regardless, I think Ickey and the Panthers find themselves in limbo right now, so the Walker deal comes at a perfect time for the GM.  Gilbert, perhaps, can work on the penalties and maybe a TE like Tremble can help offset the run blocking issues, so maybe we can actually stay the course at OT.  Maybe we do not draft a LT--maybe we draft a RT to groom behind Moton.  Maybe we draft a C.  At LT, the Panthers do not want to overreact, especially if Ickey returns to form or Walker demonstrates improvement.  Depth is certainly a concern, but a solid RT can be that depth.   I doubt the Panthers draft a LT in rounds one or maybe two.  It seems we have bigger needs at Will LB, DT, TE, and maybe S.  
×
×
  • Create New...