Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Coaching interview updates


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

These “up coming offensive gurus” better have a plan for defense as well.. Dumbass Tepper better not fall in love with all these pie in sky offensive ideas and get nothing for the defense.. If you’re going to hire inexperienced offensive HC he better have a very experienced DC with HC experience to help..

  • Pie 2
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, OldhamA said:

I'm more concerned about his plan for the defensive staff.

I’m not.. 

some fuging credence have to be given to not having time to put your philosophy on the defense when all they know is the former coaches system…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WOW!! said:

I’m not.. 

some fuging credence have to be given to not having time to put your philosophy on the defense when all they know is the former coaches system…

They ran Rivera's soft Cover 3 system - that's not what Snow ran.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, OldhamA said:

They ran Rivera's soft Cover 3 system - that's not what Snow ran.

Again how much more diverse could they make it ?? They didn’t have a full off-season to teach a whole new system right.. They simplified everything because that’s all they could do in midseason.. You don’t think the defense gets better with Wilks having his own staff and a off-season to teach his system??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WOW!! said:

Again how much more diverse could they make it ?? They didn’t have a full off-season to teach a whole new system right.. They simplified everything because that’s all they could do in midseason.. You don’t think the defense gets better with Wilks having his own staff and a off-season to teach his system??

I do not, no. He was never a good DC. He'd also have to move on from Holcombe which I doubt he does.

My main issue is that his ego fired Snow - that's a huge red flag.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WOW!! said:

These “up coming offensive gurus” better have a plan for defense as well.. Dumbass Tepper better not fall in love with all these pie in sky offensive ideas and get nothing for the defense.. If you’re going to hire inexperienced offensive HC he better have a very experienced DC with HC experience to help..

10/14 coaches in the playoffs came from offensive backgrounds before being an HC. Get with the times 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, FuFuLamePoo said:

10/14 coaches in the playoffs came from offensive backgrounds before being an HC. Get with the times 

Stop throwing blind stats without context.. 10/14 blah blah so the fug what??

the guy who has won most of the super bowls in this area was a defensive coach.. 

Still doesn’t change my mind that “up coming offensive gurus” have success when they have a defensive coordinator with experience to help them..

and if Wilks needs a offensive plan then the offensive guys need to have a equally as good defensive plan..

Edited by WOW!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

I do not, no. He was never a good DC. He'd also have to move on from Holcombe which I doubt he does.

My main issue is that his ego fired Snow - that's a huge red flag.

He was never a good DC beside 2017 when we were a top 10 defense..

okay got you..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WOW!! said:

He was never a good DC beside 2017 when we were a top 10 defense..

okay got you..

Passing defense was 18th, with very few turnovers generated.  Run defense carried that unit thanks to Luke.  That 2017 defense simply wasn’t good.  So many big plays given up…

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • FLA showed everyone it’s not about superstars. they bullied the best line in the NHL into obscurity. they played hard, were in the right positions, and ran over everything that got in their way.
    • That’s really not what you said and when I even expressed doubt as to your intentions with the post you doubled down and remained unclear on whether you were trying to drag Dean Smith for whatever reason. You just got the facts wrong, which if you don’t follow the local college programs like you say then maybe you just were mistaken and thought Smith didn’t win championships or have legit superstars, and that is ok, but you just doubled down when my first post was more corrective than anything. I’m not sure what you expect posting objectively false things like “RBA has a lot of wins with nothing to show for it like Dean Smith” (paraphrasing) on a message board with plenty of UNC fans. I’m not taking it as a personal affront, we can agree to disagree, Dean Smith’s legacy fortunately will not be affected by this conversation. Screw the (Florida) Panthers?
    • Bring in the free agents and trades.  Florida is the best team and unless Tulsky makes it happen, it’s more of the same…which isn’t bad…but it’s time to win a goddamn cup. 
×
×
  • Create New...