Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

AR scouting Report.


Ivan The Awesome
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, stbugs said:

Not really. We have 1 extra 2nd that’s likely at the end of round 2. Outside of that, we have nothing “extra” useful for trade ups than our normal picks. Our extra 4th isn’t worth enough and we don’t have a 6th or 7th either.

If we traded Burns, we easily had the ammo for a trade up, but if we do a trade up now it would severely dampen our ability to add more talent. I’m assuming a trade up would take pick 9, a 2nd and next year’s 1st. That would get us a QB but then we’d have two seconds left to fill a lot of holes the next two drafts.

Hopefully, we get lucky and find a QB late first or early 2nd. SF 3rd/our 4th could move our 2nd to the late 1st. That would still leave us with 9 and our late 2nd.

Yes we do.. 

The 49ers moved up from mid teens to 3 with 3 1st and everybody knew that team could still be good and the picks might be late 1st..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, stbugs said:

Not really. We have 1 extra 2nd that’s likely at the end of round 2. Outside of that, we have nothing “extra” useful for trade ups than our normal picks. Our extra 4th isn’t worth enough and we don’t have a 6th or 7th either.

If we traded Burns, we easily had the ammo for a trade up, but if we do a trade up now it would severely dampen our ability to add more talent. I’m assuming a trade up would take pick 9, a 2nd and next year’s 1st. That would get us a QB but then we’d have two seconds left to fill a lot of holes the next two drafts.

Hopefully, we get lucky and find a QB late first or early 2nd. SF 3rd/our 4th could move our 2nd to the late 1st. That would still leave us with 9 and our late 2nd.

whatcu got for the top 5 needs/wants, positions-wise?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, trueblade said:

I really miss Gruden's old QB Camp show. I'd LOVE to see this year's class (AR15 included) on there.

LOL, im still mad about how they framed Cam and gave me a bad feel..... but i do miss it as well....kurt does his thing thats similar and theres that youtube dude that "loves" every QB....

This class feels like one of biggest difference in ranking QB-wise.  feels like the top 5 are anywhere form 1-200

Edited by Basbear
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Yes we do.. 

The 49ers moved up from mid teens to 3 with 3 1st and everybody knew that team could still be good and the picks might be late 1st..

Thus far, the 49ers look no worse for making that deal even with Lance not working out at all so far. They still are one of the favorites to represent the NFC in the Super Bowl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Basbear said:

LOL, im still mad about how they framed Cam and gave me a bad feel..... but i do miss it as well....kurt does his thing thats similar and theres that youtube dude that "loves" every QB....

This class feels like one of biggest difference in ranking QB-wise.  feels like the top 5 are anywhere form 1-200

I like Chris Simms' QB breakdown. He picked Coral as his #1 last year. I hope he turns out to be right. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Wolfcop said:

I like Chris Simms' QB breakdown. He picked Coral as his #1 last year. I hope he turns out to be right. 

Yea i forgot about him, his ranking have been fairly good over the years. Couple bad ones, then a few great/correct ones. Honestly he is the best pick for QBs right now.....this years is the toughest in the last 20 some years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Basbear said:

Right now I do not think he makes it to 9th. Fairly strong too- 91.7%

I would think that ONE of the four will make it to 9 (Stroud, Young, AR, Levis).  It's just not that common to have 4 QBs go in the top 8 in what isn't really a loaded QB draft....

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

I would think that ONE of the four will make it to 9 (Stroud, Young, AR, Levis).  It's just not that common to have 4 QBs go in the top 8 in what isn't really a loaded QB draft....

I was thinking that only 2 would happen, but not after doing some digging and draft prep. Unlike last year, I do think teams will reach for QBs this year. The issue is theres not a stud group of LTs, DEs, or WRs to force you to overlook the 'weak" QBs....just not a creamy draft and those QBs will benefit.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, trueblade said:

Thus far, the 49ers look no worse for making that deal even with Lance not working out at all so far. They still are one of the favorites to represent the NFC in the Super Bowl.

Yes.. So anybody saying we don’t have the assets to move up are wrong..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I know it's only been training camp and one preseason game, but I think T-Mac has already shown his floor to be exactly what I said about him in the pre-draft process. That his floor if he never improves his game, is as one of the best #2 WRs in the NFL, if not even still a low end #1 (i.e. a 25th-ish best WR in the league). I think it's safe to say he's already established himself as our #1, and there are only a small handful of teams in the league where I don't think he'd be their starting #2 WR in Week 1. Bengals (Higgins), Dolphins (Waddle), Eagles (Smith), Bucs (Godwin if healthy), Rams (Adams) are really the only teams where I think he'd be the #3 as a rookie in Week 1.  A few others like the Lions (Williams), Bears (Odunze), Seahawks (Kupp), Commanders (Deebo), where he'd be the 2b to start the season, just because they're vets and/or already have a year or two of experience with their team/QB. And even having said that, I think by year 2, he's better than every one of those players (And no, I'm not saying he's already going to be better than a prime version of Adams, just whatever he'll be at 33 next year), and same goes for Kupp, but that's more because it seems like his body might be quitting on him in a way that hasn't happened to Adams (yet).
    • Well to be fair, Horn not practicing right now to let his stitches heal up from a car accident isn't something that should be concerning.  Sure, you don't want him missing practice leading into the season, but it's one that once healed, won't have lingering affects or fear of re-injuring it, it was just bad luck.
    • Quality backups are absolutely important. This franchise has been plagued with depth problems. That said, there is a little bit of dismay that Mays can't beat out a 1-legged man, and all the talk going into the off-season was how BC would certainly be gone since he had position versatility.  In the end, it doesn't matter too awfully much, as I would be shocked to no end if Corbett makes it through the season. We know what we have in reserve, and that should surely be better than trying to sign random fat guys mid season to try and take over.
×
×
  • Create New...