Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ben Johnson has me convinced.


TheCasillas
 Share

Recommended Posts

26 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

1. Team had been a winner 

2. OC for years even a Super Bowl team

3. Team had been winning before he got there 

6. Had been a OC for years

There are context to every job.. The context here is this team needs consistency and competence in coaching.. The 1st time they actually got that they were competing for a playoff spot after a 1-5 start..

This team doesn’t need to learn another system and another philosophy until they can show they can build off the one they have now…

If a guy's got it, a guy's got it. He may only have one year of OC experience but has been an NFL coach since 2012. He's had a hand in nearly every offensive position over the past decade, having been a QB, WR, and TE coach prior to OC. He was also the Lions passing game coordinator last season prior to being named OC this year.

Edited by UNCrules2187
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheCasillas said:

Serious question.... what team doesnt share that same context?

Philly Miami nor Minnesota shared the same context.. They were teams who were making the playoffs looking for a different voice.. Since they already had a winning culture they can take a shot on a “up and coming guy” with no HC experience..

New York is close to our situation but they hired a guy with way more experience and years at OC.. Daboll didn’t just pop up last year as a name he had been talked about for years just like McDermott, and Shanahan..

CONTEXT!!

if were hiring a OC with more experience then 1 year at the job.. Im cool 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, UNCrules2187 said:

If a guy's got it, a guy's got it. He may only have one year of OC experience but has been an NFL coach since 2012. He's had a hand in nearly every offensive position over the past decade, having been a QB, WR, and TE coach prior to OC. 

How the fug do you know after 1 year???

Hackett had years of experience and ppl bet their reputation he had “it”.. What happened??

Rhule and Brady had “it” what happened??

Stop with this BS you have no clue about..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

How the fug do you know after 1 year???

Hackett had years of experience and ppl bet their reputation he had “it”.. What happened??

Rhule and Brady had “it” what happened??

Stop with this BS you have no clue about..

lmao and I'm sure you have a clue about it with your vast NFL experience?

Also Hackett had years of experience and sucked which actually undermines the point you're trying to make

 

Just now, ladypanther said:

Zac Taylor was not an NFL coordinator at all. QB coach.

But what about that Bengals winning culture before he was hired!!!

Edited by UNCrules2187
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Philly Miami nor Minnesota shared the same context.. They were teams who were making the playoffs looking for a different voice.. Since they already had a winning culture they can take a shot on a “up and coming guy” with no HC experience..

New York is close to our situation but they hired a guy with way more experience and years at OC.. Daboll didn’t just pop up last year as a name he had been talked about for years just like McDermott, and Shanahan..

CONTEXT!!

if were hiring a OC with more experience then 1 year at the job.. Im cool 

Whats excludes the eagles, dolphins, and vikings from needing a competent and consistent head coach? Are their current coaches not compentent? Im confused.

 

I dont think you are using the word context correctly or you are attempting to use it in this situation when it doesnt fit....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, UNCrules2187 said:

lmao and I'm sure you have a clue about it with your vast NFL experience?

Also Hackett had years of experience and sucked which actually undermines the point you're trying to make 🙄

But you have a clue because Detroit offense looked good 1 year… got it !!! Lmao

He must be a guru in your opinion because that 1 year in Detroit… Chud must be smiling some where… lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

Whats excludes the eagles, dolphins, and vikings from needing a competent and consistent head coach? Are their current coaches not compentent? Im confused.

 

I dont think you are using the word context correctly or you are attempting to use it in this situation when it doesnt fit....

They had a competent consistent roster.. They hadn’t come off years being built and coached by a college coach who didn’t have a clue.. 

Looked at their 3 years records compared to ours .. 

Playoff teams - 5 win teams

thats context that’s the difference in situations.. 

those up and coming coaches are coming into Veteran team that have won consistently.. This isn’t that situation..

Edited by WOW!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

I thought the same thing, but I was wrong. Taylor is legit and has built one hell of a team. @Toomersgave me a hard dose of reality on Taylor.

I’ve listened to Cindy radio and beat writers and it was true.. Taylor was on his way to being Kingsbury before last years big jump and Burrows excellence..

Edited by WOW!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have more faith in XL improving than I do in Tmac being a true number 1 recuever
    • Round 1. TMac arguably the best WR in the draft Round 2. Scour ton mentioned as a possible 1st round edge.     Texas A&M did not use him the same way Purdue did. After the 2023 season he was listed as a first round grade. I believe had Texas A&M used him like they did at Purdue he never makes it out of round 1. Round 3 Princely Umanmielen, we'll go by Princely.  Another highly graded player we got in a lower round. As the video suggests, even if he plays only on passing down it's a positive. Give him a couple of years to develop a he could be a three down player.  Round 4a Etienne IMO a huge upgrade over Blackshear. I can see him in a similar role as CMC without the heavy workload. He can run in between the tackles and has some shifty moves. Give Canales some flexibility. A fellow huddler pointed out UGA running backs don't see the field if they cannot pick up the blitz. Really good pick. Round 4b Ransom a hard hitting safety that has played three different positions on defense. Great pick Round 5a Cam Jackson a massive NT in round 5. I believe a solid rotational pick in a lower round. We added a beast that could make offenses quiver when he's lined up with Brown. Great Value  Round 5b Evans This is another player that can block and has good hands. He also had better seasons before 2024. As a rookie he's probably leaps and bounds better than Ian Thomas. I think he gives us a three headed monster at TE.  Round 6 Horn Jr. Many believe he's just going to be a KR/PR player. I believe there are going to be packages for him to get on the field as a WR. His speed with TMac and Thielen in the slot could be special. I'm really looking forward to seeing him in training camp. I've watched some film and he is very explosive.  Overall I love our picks. I honestly believe all of them will contribute this season. I don't believe we reached on one player in this draft.  This weekend we get a small look at these rookies     
    • You joke, but hasn't basically the whole team been in Charlotte this past week together? I'm not one to see the random dumb stuff players put out on social media in the offseason and think it means that's ALL they've been doing and not working on their game.  But it's a little strange that all this is coming out at the same time we're seeing tons of stuff with the team in Charlotte together, even if it's just working out and not even official team OTA's or anything. So he gets a pass from me saying anything now, but if he doesn't show clear improvement this season, it then opens him up to some retroactive criticism for some things.
×
×
  • Create New...