Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Wilks' Post-Game Locker Room talk vs. Saints


Icege
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

Hats off to wilks going 6-6 as interim head coach. I do wonder if he started sooner if we have a winning record. Funny how Eddie sealed the season with a game winning kick, and could have sealed a playoff birth if he did it in Atlanta too

Eddy grew from his failures after the first ATL game and hadn’t missed a kick since, including a high pressure kick yesterday to win the game. Can’t say the same about the other dudes on the team who continually fail at what they do. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, stbugs said:

I hope we don’t keep saying this. Tampa isn't going to sit Fournette, Evans, Vea and Brady in the 2nd quarter. I’m not even sure how many others they sat. Tampa even with Gabbert had a lead going into halftime. Tampa rested a lot of guys and certainly weren’t playing for a division title. We lost to the Bucs and that sealed our fate, so acting like losing that game didn’t have any impact on yesterday’s games is a bit disingenuous. Heck, even the Saints truly had nothing to play for and maybe don’t go for it on 4th down, etc.

We are comparing two different worlds of hypotheticals... I used "could" for a reason. Meaning chance. I did not say "would." I understand where you are coming from...but its not really worth either one of us to spend time debating.  Unless we are living in the block universe, and if that is the case.... then pull up a chair bc we will be here for awhile. 

Edited by TheCasillas
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

Hats off to wilks going 6-6 as interim head coach. I do wonder if he started sooner if we have a winning record. Funny how Eddie sealed the season with a game winning kick, and could have sealed a playoff birth if he did it in Atlanta too

I think with wilks all year we either win the division or are competing for the last wild card spot. I’d give us two more wins (Cleveland and Arizona) to get to 9-8. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BIGH2001 said:

I think with wilks all year we either win the division or are competing for the last wild card spot. I’d give us two more wins (Cleveland and Arizona) to get to 9-8. 

I could see that but then pretty much gurantee to get bounced in the first round because their strategy doesnt work against good teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Why? He had 1 catch for 2 yards before the Saints went into prevent mode on the last drive and left him wide open for his second catch. 17 catches and 28 catches in 2 years doesn’t make me giddy. 1 TD in 2 years?

In the 2021 draft, 4 WRs drafted later than him, a WR dumped by his drafting team, a WR who missed 16 games due to injury, and 3 RBs drafted later than him have more career receptions than Marshall. Heck, our rock handed backup RB and backup TE drafted that year have only 6 receptions less.

He played better than his rookie year but 28 receptions by your WR2? That’s awful. He was 152th in receptions according to ESPN before this week and his 2 receptions. That’s including RBs and TEs. Outside of the OL, who were healthy this year, Marshall was 2nd in offensive snap counts to DJ.

Also, having a big WR doesn’t give me warm fuzzies with 1 TD after 2 years.

KB (2 years) 136-1949-16TD

Funchess (2 years) 54-844-9TD

Marshall (2 years) 45-628-1TD

Not living up to Funchess, who was drafted around the same slot and was the 3rd receiving option behind KB/Ginn and Olsen isn’t good even if we don’t have Cam. Cam was never putting up 5000 yard passing seasons. We only had 300-500 less passing yards the past two years than we did in Cam’s MVP season (10-15% less).

I guess Marshall could break out at some time but it’s not good that he’s not even close to living up to two big WRs who had to contend with Olsen. Heck, take out Olsen and WRs may have more receiving yards in 2021-2022 than 2014-2016.

IMHO, we need a better WR to pair with DJ.

These are all great stats but they are missing one key piece to why TMJ hasnt had a chance to do more.... he was stuck behind Rhule's negligance of developing young players and getting them on the field. 

All of TMJ's rookie year we were forcing him to play slot... he isn't a slot reciver. Yes, he played slot many times at LSU but that is far different at the NFL level. TMJ's real opportunities to play didnt happen until after Robbie Anderson left. I am not going to hold that aginst this guy, when he made NFL capable catches over NFL starting corners week to week during our 4-2 span.

 

I dont understand why you are using the language Saints went into prevent mode on the last drive and left him wide open for his second catch.  

We were in max protect on that play and the saints brought a disguised blitz. They had a single safety high (honey badger) that shaded DJ Moore's side and TMJ beat his man who had outside leverage (Lattimore) on his in route.

Loose statements like that make it hard to have a conversation with you, bc im not sure how much you are speaking from knowledge (which normally you do) and how much you are making up... like the above example. I enjoy our debates but this one doesn't have much foundation outside speculation and loose projections.

 

It makes debates difficult on here bc it introduces doubt in statements of certainty. 

image.png.511ecf60fcc35d6c488d457d6c9106e3.png

image.png.70db9ac11becd64e617ff337a8aa7e12.png

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Tr3ach said:

I could see that but then pretty much gurantee to get bounced in the first round because their strategy doesnt work against good teams.

Not the fault of Wilks. This team isn’t his and he did a damn good job keeping it together.  He’s a good man and he will land on his feet and kick ass no matter where he ends up.  I for  one hope it’s In Carolina and HC.  He has earned it.  

Edited by ickmule
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, stbugs said:

I’ve seen it posted multiple times as if Eddy’s the reason why we didn’t make it with no context around Tampa losing. That’s why I responded. We didn’t make the playoffs because we lost to Tampa, simple as that. This week is irrelevant because Tampa locked the division up last week.

Then my statement as precise as i attempted to position. I was leaning into I wonder if Wilks could have won more if he had started the season as HC. That's as far as I wanted to go down the path of "What if"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sure it does, maybe not every position and not every draft.  You have to admit the hit rate goes down the further in the draft you get.  Would you more readily find a generational talent at the #2 pick or #19 pick?  High picks are considered "busts" if they doesn't pan out, whereas guys drafted later don't have that level of scrutiny upon them.  Different expectation levels.  If Styles does indeed go #2, I already listed the rarefied air that he would be in.  Maybe he doesn't set the League on fire, but my gut feeling is he does.  Again, you don't take an off-ball LB #2 if he is just a 'really good' player.
    • To illustrate my point, I watched (and commented on the Huddle) that Rozeboom would often wait a full second (or close to it) before taking his first step.  I assume that he probably had issues with false steps, a faulty practice that can take an ILB out of the gap completely.  Watch Luke and you see a step with the snap, and rarely was it a false step.  Rozeboom may have had 100 tackles (speculating) but initial contact was 2-3 yards on the defensive side of the ball.  Luke's 100 tackles were made 1-2 yards from the LOS.  Over the course of a year, Luke was much more productive (more fumbles, fewer long gainers, more OL penalties, fewer first downs, etc) that Rozeboom, but on the stat sheet, they both had 100 tackles.  In fact, Rozeboom's inefficiency kept him on the field more (more first downs, fewer OL penalties, turnovers, and punts) so he should have MORE tackles.   I would like to see stats that break down those things.   For example again, Josh Norman was slow--4.68 or so at CB.  However, his anticipation speed was incredible.  He made as many plays as a 4.4 CB.  I had one coach (college--later became the head coach at WCU) tell me that slower players have to use their brains more to still be around.  Elite athletes can just get by on their physical superiority.  He added, "Rarely does a football player run full speed.  Most of the time, they are not, so the 40 time is misleading stat.  Smart players overcome shortcomings--when the elite athlete becomes average (slows with age, advances in level of competition) they struggle against smarter (football IQ) competition.  
    • Obviously tongue in cheek hyperbole. But we do not need a first round RB to competete for a championship. We need intelligent roster building. That to me is the complete opposite of intelligent roster building because it is a prime resource at a devalued plug and play position when we have needs across the defense.
×
×
  • Create New...