Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Scott Fowler Observer column on coaching hire


raleigh-panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

Wilks is no idiot. 

We know him well enough that he Luke to be aggressive, and dictate to the other team, not just on defense,  but offense too. Which if most fans whom want an offensive minded HC will be honest,  that's what they want with their offense.  

I believe Wilks, with his own staff, can not just be a winning coach, but a Championship coach. 

I know I'm not with the masses on this opinion, but I truly believe it. 

I am, as always, keeping an open mind on whomever Tepper hires.

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, pantherclaw said:

Wilks is no idiot. 

We know him well enough that he Luke to be aggressive, and dictate to the other team, not just on defense,  but offense too. Which if most fans whom want an offensive minded HC will be honest,  that's what they want with their offense.  

I believe Wilks, with his own staff, can not just be a winning coach, but a Championship coach. 

I know I'm not with the masses on this opinion, but I truly believe it. 

I am, as always, keeping an open mind on whomever Tepper hires.

Why do believe this? I’m curious. I believe he’s a high character guy but isn’t the football brain we would need to get us out of the cellar. Hes Ron Rivera without fielding top defensive units as a coordinator 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Aussie Tank said:

Why do believe this? I’m curious. I believe he’s a high character guy but isn’t the football brain we would need to get us out of the cellar. Hes Ron Rivera without fielding top defensive units as a coordinator 

Because I have these things called eyes. I'm quite the observer.  This allows me to have my own opinions, not based on biased hyper bull. 

Edited by pantherclaw
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He has some fine points and some I disagree with.  This is a weird quote though.   "We know already that Wilks would work out. The players respect him and generally want him to return. He grew up in Charlotte and is deeply rooted in the Queen City."

hes pushing the media narrative.  How do we already know he would work out?  He went .500 against one of the easiest schedules in the nfl.  Interim coaches often are really good that year and then fizzle out quickly once hired full time.  But the "we already know that Wilks would work out" quote is such a weird thing to say when you're trying to push your opinion as fact. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We beat Atlanta by 30 in the first meeting
    • The situation here was the doing of David Tepper.  Frank Reich didn't want Young, he wanted Stroud. Stroud fit his QB mold better than Young. So yeah, he didn't design an offense for him. He was lied to by his boss and he didn't want to be here. Would you? It sucks for Young, but as I said, that has nothing to do with his terrible footwork, poor mechanics, his shitty drop backs, fumble issues, not bothering to look off the Atlanta safety that turned into a pick 6 by his own admission. Those were all things that had nothing to do with Frank, the OL or the rest of the team.  And Houston wasn't a complete team. They had the 2nd pick in the draft because they sucked. They built a team and had a damn good HC that I wanted here but he refused Tepper's interview.  Young has been protected in ways no other QB has. Dalton has been kept because he has never been a threat to take the job from Young. We signed him to a 2 year deal this offseason when it was clearly evident we needed an upgrade. For 2m more per year we could have and should have looked at Brissett if we didn't go after Howell, Russell, Winston or anyone else. Anyone else other than Dalton would have been a serious risk to take Young's starting job. If Young hadn't been the 1st overall pick, and been a day 3 pick instead, he would have been cut as a rookie. If he were on any other team as a starter, this message board would be laughing like hell at whoever was starting him for 3 years. That's why this team gets murdered when Young doesn't play. He's been sheltered from ever having to worry about his job and the QB room proves it.  I've been extremely critical of how this team has been constructed the past 3 years, especially on offense. But this whole narrative that Bryce has always been good enough and it's everyone else's fault that he's not succeeding isn't matching up to what he's been putting on the field week in and week out. 
    • He sucks to be honest. He hasn't made much of a difference at all.
×
×
  • Create New...