Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

HC Candidate List


Bear Hands
 Share

Recommended Posts

32 minutes ago, CanadianCat said:

Kellen Moore has never been on my radar but thinking about it, he has more OC coaching experience then some of the guys on this list, so his track record is longer and he is in a very high pressure environment. 

He would be an intriguing guy to bring in. 

The problem is that he is not a good OC. Dak has regressed under Kellen Moore. Week to week the Cowboys offense is so inconsistent. They ultimately end up relying on their stars and not their game plans to win games.  

A large abundance of Cowboys fans would repeat this exact sentiment. 

  • Beer 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TheCasillas said:

The problem is that he is not a good OC. Dak has regressed under Kellen Moore. Week to week the Cowboys offense is so inconsistent. They ultimately end up relying on their stars and not their game plans to win games.  

A large abundance of Cowboys fans would repeat this exact sentiment. 

ok good to know!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

The problem is that he is not a good OC. Dak has regressed under Kellen Moore. Week to week the Cowboys offense is so inconsistent. They ultimately end up relying on their stars and not their game plans to win games.  

A large abundance of Cowboys fans would repeat this exact sentiment. 

I didn't think they were good under Scott Linehan either. I also think a lot of the regression is because of players age and being injured so much. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, carpanfan96 said:

I didn't think they were good under Scott Linehan either. I also think a lot of the regression is because of players age and being injured so much. 

Under Scott Liinehan the cowboys had the cowboys a top 10 offense 2 out of his 3 final years. One of those seasons they had the 2nd best offense in the entire league. Not sure how you are attributing Dak's regression to his age... He is 29 and should be on his ascent to his prime as a QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

Under Scott Liinehan the cowboys had the cowboys a top 10 offense 2 out of his 3 final years. One of those seasons they had the 2nd best offense in the entire league. Not sure how you are attributing Dak's regression to his age... He is 29 and should be on his ascent to his prime as a QB.

They ranked 22nd, 5th, 14th and 22nd in his four seasons. I said injuries combined with age. 

 

Moore has ranked 1st, 14th, 1st and 11th in his four years. 

Edited by carpanfan96
  • Pie 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, ECHornet said:

My outlook on our future based on potential hires:

Optimistic - Johnson, Ryans

Undecided - Steichen, Kafka, Mayo

Content, but pessimistic- Wilks

Disappointed: Dorsey, Reich

Hopeless: Caldwell 

I’d put Steichen in the top row and Reich with Wilks but pretty much sitting the same 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Aussie Tank said:

I’d put Steichen in the top row and Reich with Wilks but pretty much sitting the same 

I’d be pretty excited to see how it plays out with Steichen, but I’m undecided based on reading he can be a little awkward. Maybe that’s overblown. 
 

You’re probably right on Reich.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, CanadianCat said:

Kellen Moore has never been on my radar but thinking about it, he has more OC coaching experience then some of the guys on this list, so his track record is longer and he is in a very high pressure environment. 

He would be an intriguing guy to bring in. 

More time as a coordinator, yeah. But he's got less actual coaching experience than pretty much anybodyHe's only been a coach since 2018

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Bryce isn't a risk-taking gunslinger.  That's just QB DNA.  No one has ever said that is what we were drafting when we went that route.  That's my point.  That's not Bryce. Can you make Alex Smith throw deep? Sure.  He will occasionally.  In the reverse, can you ask Brett Favre to just take the easy layups? Sure.  He can in moments.  But in the end, they are what they are.  as I have said, Canales probably could win more games with PJ Walker.  And Bryce is a better overall QB than PJ.  PJ Walker would also have much worse games mixed in that Bryce would.   
    • From what i see, Canales offense requires a QB that is willing to take chances to maximize the offense. XL is also the kind of receiver that needs a qb to be risky to bring out his full potential. Its just a matter of if Bryce is gonna be that QB.
    • Baker just played how Baker played.... everywhere but here. He is a risk taking gunslinger.  Always has been.  And last year was asked to be what he was.   Geno Smith was the best deep ball passer in the NFL his comeback season.  Wasn't even close that year.  Again, that's the type passer Canales has always been around in the offenses he has been part of.  The pass game that compliments the stubborn run is the deep chunk play pass game.   And that was his first investment with XL.  My continued point, is the same as going into last season.  It's a bad marriage going in.  The QB doesn't fit the scheme.  Again.  Carrol/Fox/Ron....all paired up their boring football with risk taking QBs.  And again, I'm fine if that is where we are going.  It's not my preference but that's not my argument.  I'm saying if we are doing that, we need a QB that matches it.     
×
×
  • Create New...