Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Playoffs


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

Andy Reid tree (Paul Brown) and Bill Belichick tree (Chuck Fairbanks) are crossbreeding at the championship level with the Giants coaching staff. The best of a mixed West Coast and Erhardt-Perkins offense.

You can watch as the Giants become dominant or grab their offensive genius in Kafka/Tierney now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, frankw said:

I'll take some pie as repayment for you shitting on my head earlier when I told you he was overrated 🫡

Lol still a poo post got what it deserved. What was the last metric that mattered for you GWD? Look up the leader this year. It's cousins with 8 in the 4th. Yeah he can't win them all. And boy that was a bad time for a bad one. But over rated nah. He ain't top 5 and is likely on the outside of the top 10 but he is right there. Defense didn't do him favors or the OL (false start on the damn sneak was bad for by VT boy) and had to kick the FG. 

I'd take cousins here all damn day he's wolds better than the teddy B comments floating out. Lolz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, chbright said:

Lol still a poo post got what it deserved. What was the last metric that mattered for you GWD? Look up the leader this year. It's cousins with 8 in the 4th. Yeah he can't win them all. And boy that was a bad time for a bad one. But over rated nah. He ain't top 5 and is likely on the outside of the top 10 but he is right there. Defense didn't do him favors or the OL (false start on the damn sneak was bad for by VT boy) and had to kick the FG. 

I'd take cousins here all damn day he's wolds better than the teddy B comments floating out. Lolz

There's a lot of cope in this post. You must've had money on Minnesota.

Feel Better Cheer Up GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nobody is saying we don't need it, just that we have bigger needs elsewhere, and that type of WR is actually something that is often found in the mid rounds, you just have to scout and evaluate properly. Here's another way of looking at why WR in the 1st shouldn't even be considered an option. Looking only at players currently on the team, what position group would you feel strongest about 4 years from now? I'm not sure there is a better answer there than WR, as you have to think T-Mac is our best player on the team in 4 years, with Coker not far behind. Our OL is too old to be considered, my opinions on Bryce is well known, Hubbard will be done by then and the rest of the RB is an unknown, Off-ball LB is maybe our biggest need, we only have 1 legit safety, it's certainly not TE, and our 2nd best CB right now will be 33 by then.   Brown should still be a beast as he'll only be 31, but nobody else on the DL projects to be that good in 4 years.  Edge rusher with Phillips, Scourton, and Princely is probably the only other possible answer than WR. So yes, that fast/shifty type of WR is 100% a need of ours, but we have so many other bigger needs both in the immediate and future, that to me, taking a WR in the 1st for the 3rd year in a row and having hit on another WR in the same time frame, just makes zero sense both currently and looking into the future.
    • Laughing at Slayton (Mooney or Calvin Austin III), but telling me that Coker is the next best thing since sliced bread...You laughing at Theo Johnson in reference to our guys too? LOL No one in their right mind thinks Nabers is anything but a stud (definitely top 10 if not 5 potential). You do realize that Thomas was in a new system with a furst-time coach last year (with a questionable QB to boot)? And yet still, it's possible that he eclipses even T-mac (not saying that he will). They didn't even mention Travis Hunter. In any event, we're not in the top half. Draft another legit receiver, and we will be. 
    • Absolutely, very fair assessment of the team. 
×
×
  • Create New...