Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Lamar could be gone……Article ahead.


WarPanthers89
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, AggieLean said:

While Shannon Sharpe is one who says Lamar is right in what he’s doing. In fact; he says he’d do the same.

Understood, but my point was this isn't just a fan opinion.

I don't have any strong feelings about Jackson either way but I'm not in favor of shelling out for a deal like this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, *FreeFua* said:

Would love to see what Ben Johnson could do with a mobile QB like Lamar. If he can make a sub par statue in Goff look good… 

We would need one more WR that is a burner speed, a pass catching TE and a check down RB 

 

it’s baffling that BAL never gave Lamar more than Mark Andrews

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

Understood, but my point was this isn't just a fan opinion.

I don't have any strong feelings about Jackson either way but I'm not in favor of shelling out for a deal like this.

$250 million check to a guy worth $15 billion is like asking you to write a check for $15

 

if BAL makes Lamar available it won’t be a money problem for Tepper

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheBigKat said:

Your neighbor sold his house for $450k

 

your house is way nicer, larger, etc, in the same neighborhood, you going to accept $375k?

 

 No you’ll be demanding $500k

 

thats what Lamar did and rightfully so, people calling him a loser/quitter shows you the lack of understanding basic economics 

Yo

 

1 minute ago, TheBigKat said:

Your neighbor sold his house for $450k

 

your house is way nicer, larger, etc, in the same neighborhood, you going to accept $375k?

 

 No you’ll be demanding $500k

 

thats what Lamar did and rightfully so, people calling him a loser/quitter shows you the lack of understanding basic economics 

The greed of NFL QBs and their agents and idiot ownership is what is upsetting the balance of the league.

I have no problem with the best person at his position setting the market. I have a problem with the next man up setting the market because it leads to financial chaos. The Watson deal was dumb. One owners foolishness shouldn't determine the salary structure for the entire NFL. 

Guys are wanting 50 mil a year to play QB on a 53 man roster with a salary cap of approximately $200 million. That doesn't make sense on any level. 

It's unfortunate that guys get cut before the contract expires, but those guys aren't walking away empty handed. They get huge signing bonuses up front and a significant portion of those contracts are guaranteed. I heard one former GM all big contracts are essentially 3-4 deals. That's not the worst thing when you're making millions of dollars over that time period.

 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jayboogieman said:

Pass on any and all QB trades unless it's moving up in the draft for one the team is sold on. Trying to take shortcuts hasn't worked out too well for the Panthers. Just draft a rookie and take your lumps.

I mean I get what you are saying but Lamar is an mvp while Darnold and baker aren’t even close. If they do go after Lamar, you know you’re getting a great player, trading for a rookie who has yet to play a down, to me, is more of a gamble. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, TheBigKat said:

$250 million check to a guy worth $15 billion is like asking you to write a check for $15

if BAL makes Lamar available it won’t be a money problem for Tepper

I don't give a damn about Tepper's money.

I care a lot about the team's cap space and draft picks.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SCO96 said:

Yo

 

The greed of NFL QBs and their agents and idiot ownership is what is upsetting the balance of the league.

I have no problem with the best person at his position setting the market. I have a problem with the next man up setting the market because it leads to financial chaos. The Watson deal was dumb. One owners foolishness shouldn't determine the salary structure for the entire NFL. 

Guys are wanting 50 mil a year to play QB on a 53 man roster with a salary cap of approximately $200 million. That doesn't make sense on any level. 

It's unfortunate that guys get cut before the contract expires, but those guys aren't walking away empty handed. They get huge signing bonuses up front and a significant portion of those contracts are guaranteed. I heard one former GM all big contracts are essentially 3-4 deals. That's not the worst thing when you're making millions of dollars over that time period.

 

If an agent isn't doing what is in the best interest of their client then that agent will soon be the assistant manager at Home Depot

 

I personally have no problem with these guys getting all they can get

Amazon paid Goddell and his cronies $1 billion a year to broadcast shitty Thursday games

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, The Lobo said:

I mean I get what you are saying but Lamar is an mvp while Darnold and baker aren’t even close. If they do go after Lamar, you know you’re getting a great player, trading for a rookie who has yet to play a down, to me, is more of a gamble. 

You also need to look at mileage(injuries and just general hits) and cost(contract). The rookie has less of both than a 5 year vet mvp type.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jayboogieman said:

You also need to look at mileage(injuries and just general hits) and cost(contract). The rookie has less of both than a 5 year vet mvp type.

Very true, both are high risk high reward. At this point, I’m up for whatever…just not another middle of the road vet (Derek carr for example) 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TheBigKat said:

If an agent isn't doing what is in the best interest of their client then that agent will soon be the assistant manager at Home Depot

 

I personally have no problem with these guys getting all they can get

Amazon paid Goddell and his cronies $1 billion a year to broadcast shitty Thursday games

These guys and girls want “honor” from one side. When the other side is dishonorable, they explain it away “well, atleast the player got something.” Again, the Ravens organization wouldn’t even be in the playoffs if it wasn’t for Lamar playing the time he did. We see things fell apart once he left. He showed just by sitting out, that he is worth what he’s asking.

 

9 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

Pass on any and all QB trades unless it's moving up in the draft for one the team is sold on. Trying to take shortcuts hasn't worked out too well for the Panthers. Just draft a rookie and take your lumps.

Ultimately, this is the route I’d like the organization to take. Draft a guy in the first, and let’s rock on. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, AggieLean said:

These guys and girls want “honor” from one side. When the other side is dishonorable, they explain it away “well, atleast the player got something.” Again, the Ravens organization wouldn’t even be in the playoffs if it wasn’t for Lamar playing the time he did. We see things fell apart once he left. He showed just by sitting out, that he is worth what he’s asking.

 

Ultimately, this is the route I’d like the organization to take. Draft a guy in the first, and let’s rock on. 

I just love all the high and mighty speeches when everyone on here would do the same thing that Lamar and his agent (mother) are doing

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • "So much of what the Panthers are going to do next week isn't dictated by their preference, but by what happens above them. That's another benefit of not getting locked into need. For instance, if you're thinking you want a receiver, seeing five or six of them go off the board and reacting by taking the sixth or seventh off your list instead of the first (or second or third) something else isn't necessarily wise." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-back-into-the-weeds-of-the-nfl-draft-bryce-young-charlotte-hornets-mock-draft This is what some don't seem to get, I don't care how many times it is said: You're NOT going to draft an inferior person at one position, just because that position is perceived as, or is in fact, a bigger need. That would basically nullify, or at least lessen, the reason why you set yourself up via free agency to be able to take the BPA/BAP on the board in the first place.  Yes, the process is complex, very much involved and ongoing, but the overall philosophy is not rocket science. You set yourself up in order not to be pigeonholed into taking a lower graded player at the expense of a higher graded one. This is why Morgan, Gantt and countless of others say the same thing. This is why it's just nonsensical to set yourself in a position where you don't have to, but then act like you have to come hell or high water: "Oh, we have to draft [whatever position], and we can't draft [this position]."  I'm good with whatever they do, until proven otherwise, but even then, you have to be mature enough to know that drafting is an imperfect exercise, filled with hits and misses. And, you generally don't know if you've hit, and especially missed, right away. Moreover, like I've said before, sometimes two players--different positions or not--can both be hits on their respective teams, so in that sense, it's not purely about a right or wrong pick as much as it's about putting puzzle pieces together at the time the best way that you know how.  At the end of the day, people are going to believe what they want to believe, but one thing that's true is that what the Panthers do regarding the draft is dependent upon what others do, and what others do can and does change things. That being the case, it's just another reason why you can't go in with tunnel vision. The thought of doing that is preposterous.
    • He is a talented player with a lot of potential but ultimately he is a legend in his own mind and the minds of those who attack on his behalf when people pinpoint inconvenient truths. I could see people being so hostile over him if he actually had that kind of juice but he doesn't. Even in the Heat win LaMelo took 31 shots and was 40%. If not for Coby White's late heroics we would have lost in regulation. The reality is we do have pieces in place to compete in the playoffs but in year 6 and with a supermax and a salary that is only going to increase over the next few years LaMelo Ball simply does not look like a franchise centerpiece that you can go on multiple playoff runs with. Look at someone like Trae Young. His team moved on. And he actually took them to the conference finals. The Hornets are at a crossroads. Very tough conversations need to be had in the offseason.
×
×
  • Create New...