Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Family resorts ideas


Ja  Rhule
 Share

Recommended Posts

In the past 6-7 years my family and I only rented homes in Outer Banks or took a trip to Destin.  That’s it.  I feel like it’s getting a bit stale and kind of want to try something new.  Does anyone go anywhere else on the east coast?  I got 4 wild kids from 4 to 10 years of age.  I have been searching for resorts in Florida that have restaurants, attractions and fun stuff to do.

Please no Myrtle Beach… last time I rented 4 star suite there it smelled like urine and had roaches.  I haven’t been back there in 9 years and will never go back.

Edited by Ja Rhule
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Anybodyhome said:

Not my cup of tea, but Gatlinburg? Also heard the Great Wolf Lodge or something near Charlotte was good for kids.

Ocean City, Maryland? Haven't.been there in 30 years... smaller scale Myrtle?

Great Wolf Lodge is hell on Earth.  But the kids like it. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you, all!  I’m looking for something where I park my car and never seen it again for a week.  Clear ocean water with no big waves.  Everything walking distance and fun for the kids.  Almost everything should be in my price range.  No four season villas tho.  We have been vacationing at Emerald Grande at Destin for years now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Ja Rhule said:

Thank you, all!  I’m looking for something where I park my car and never seen it again for a week.  Clear ocean water with no big waves.  Everything walking distance and fun for the kids.  Almost everything should be in my price range.  No four season villas tho.  We have been vacationing at Emerald Grande at Destin for years now.

Park your car at the airport.  Go to Atlantis in Bahamas

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Ja Rhule said:

Haha!  I just went to Atlantis with my son 6 months ago.  It was amazing.  The plane tickets are nuts otherwise I so would do it.  $13k for flights is too much.

you could get a covid cruise to the Bahamas for much cheaper than those flights lol. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was watching a YouTube and it was said that scout and GM insider types were saying the NIL had killed rounds 4-7. I don’t know that I buy it, seems like it might for a year or maybe two but then those guys have to move on.  NCAA is apparently about to give 5 years of eligibility. It is gonna skew those entrants older maybe.   
    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...