Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Reich New Head Coach


NJPanthers12
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, Catsfan69 said:

I think it's a bad hire. I wouldn't have considered him or Moore.

There's no need to be so salty about it that you attack his family. You act as if it were a personal insult to you that Tepper hired who HE wanted. It never was OUR decision. 

  • Pie 6
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, WUnderhill said:

Haha, what? Can a mod at least edit this nonsense so it doesn’t make the page 10x longer than it needs to be? I took out the spaces in the quote, you’re welcome.

The blank spaces were the only parts that made sense.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

As much as I'm meh on Reich, here's hoping Moore, TMJ, the O-line, any returning RB, and the TEs are ready to put in WORK on a completely new playbook.

This is my hope as well.  If he can get TMJ and a (new) TE involved in this offense, design an offense around the strengths of the QB, then we should see some improvement.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hate this for Wilks, but I like the hire.  Wilks is a good man, a local guy, and the players liked him.  He got dealt a bad hand in Arizona, and he did pretty well here.  In my opinion, 6-6 with Sam Darnold as the QB after trading away your #2 WR and #1 RB is pretty good.  I am a fan of his, but did not want him to be the coach because I think we need a "QB whisperer" here.
 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

There are competent game managing QB's expected to be available in free agency, however. Why spend on an incompetent one?

Incompetent is a matter of perspective I guess.  I cannot say how Reich looks at the situation.  He's worked with some bad qb's so he may not be so picky about a short timer qb. But that depends on whether they are in win now mode or are still building through the draft. With Rhule it seemed that changed season to season.  So either way I do not care. It's going to be ugly for a while anyway until they can get a qb that can get his playbook down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

There's no need to be so salty about it that you attack his family. You act as if it were a personal insult to you that Tepper hired who HE wanted. It never was OUR decision. 

I'm not salty that I'm attacking his family.

I'm just anti simp and believe men should stick to their values and not sway because of a woman. 

If I am out with a chick and she says I'm vegan I order a steak. I don't try to force her to eat a steak. She can have her choices but I'm not going to appease her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Catsfan69 said:

I'm not salty that I'm attacking his family.

I'm just anti simp and believe men should stick to their values and not sway because of a woman. 

If I am out with a chick and she says I'm vegan I order a steak. I don't try to force her to eat a steak. She can have her choices but I'm not going to appease her.

The fug?

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

I'm not salty that I'm attacking his family.

I'm just anti simp and believe men should stick to their values and not sway because of a woman. 

If I am out with a chick and she says I'm vegan I order a steak. I don't try to force her to eat a steak. She can have her choices but I'm not going to appease her.

You have issues. It's too early for your mess seek help or a therapist.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

I'm not salty that I'm attacking his family.

I'm just anti simp and believe men should stick to their values and not sway because of a woman. 

If I am out with a chick and she says I'm vegan I order a steak. I don't try to force her to eat a steak. She can have her choices but I'm not going to appease her.

So you are a real man on the internet.  Good for you I guess. It's just an odd way to flex on someone just because you don't like the fact he's not your preferred coach, a man you do not know or his family.  I don't think that makes you look like a he-man at all. But you do you. 

Edited by Jon Snow
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • First off, my memory is faulty and so I should remember you. Anyways, welcome back. Having been around here since 2004/2005, I do have to say all these hot takes are not necessary new. I still very much remember all the constant complaints about Jake Delhomme. How he was too inaccurate, fumbled the ball too often, threw bad interceptions, and how Steve Smith deserved a better QB. How this franchise needed to replace Jake for someone better because he dragged everyone down. We even had names for Jake defenders; Blind Delhomme Jock Sniffers (BDJS). That one thread about Chris Weinke over Jake Delhomme because Weinke threw for 423 Yards but only scoring 13 points remains the worst hot takes I've ever seen around here. So to me, it feels like history repeating itself again and I don't feel like getting that much involved in flame wars like I used to. I am more of a sit back and see what the players/team does type of person. And even then, yes, there are so many moving parts that it's not as easy to pinpoint the core issues, especially when you're not inside the building and know every single detail.  And yes, I think even way back then, I hated how overvalued the QB position was and it hasn't gotten much better. It's to where my philosophy has shifted to where if you can't win a SB with a QB on their rookie contract, you might as well get another one. Otherwise, you have to give that QB so much money that the rest of the roster suffers and your window becomes quite narrow.  That's why I'm skeptical that Mahomes/Burrow/Jackson/Allen will win more than one or two SB's between them. None of them look as invisible as they did a few years ago and that's because their targets are much inferior and/or they are getting more roughed up behind a worse O-line.
    • Haha I was still off was thinking of mac jones he has done extremely well this year with basically no weopons as all the 49ers are hurt except for mcaffrey but he is playing slow this year for some reason. 
×
×
  • Create New...