Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The NFL is Rigged


Diehardpanth02
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

If we win the Super Bowl in the next few years, will it still be rigged?

(or will we have just risen above the odds to triumph over a corrupt system?) 🤔

If we win, its only because Tepper paid the refs.  If we lose, its only because he didn't.  The players, coaches, etc... are completely irrelevant.  lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, onmyown said:

serious question

how would you tell the difference between outdated old men genuinely doing a shitty job and ‘conspiring/meeting together ‘rigging’ the game with zero proof?

all fans think then and their team is special and if luck doesn’t go their way things are rigged. It’s not unique 

in reality, the concept of primarily old men running around trying to spot things, in a day an age where we have laser and computer chips, is more likely and logically the culprit

Well, sometimes you don’t have a dog in the fight.  Like last night.  And you simply see the NFL putting their thumb on the scale to steer the game toward their preference. 

and yeah, there is a reason in today’s world of tech advances the billion dollar game is steered by a part time good old boys club employee. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regardless of whether the game was rigged, these playoffs have been god-awful compared to last year.  One memorable / exciting game (jax vs la).  

Yesterday's Phi vs SF game ended as soon as SF couldn't throw a forward pass.  The CIN vs KC game was the least exciting last second FG game I can recall watching due to the officiating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Diehardpanth02 said:

Lord. This is a football forum. And a football topic. Not Voter fraud. If you want proof go get somebody else to do it. It's Moneyday.

They make the same amount of money regardless of who goes. So there is literally no reason for them to rig it.  

Edited by Davidson Deac II
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Got it, so its just an absurd comment with no basis in reason or logic.  

There is logic and reason behind my statement. Only a fool would think otherwise. I bet you pay your tax dollars too, and say, well at least it goes to keep up our roads. It's for a good cause.

Edited by Diehardpanth02
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CRA said:

Well, sometimes you don’t have a dog in the fight.  Like last night.  And you simply see the NFL putting their thumb on the scale to steer the game toward their preference. 

and yeah, there is a reason in today’s world of tech advances the billion dollar game is steered by a part time good old boys club employee. 

What’s their preference? KC and CIN are very similar markets. Both had elite QBs. Both were in SB recently. In a league set up for every team to finish around .500, what’s the preference? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

If we win, its only because Tepper paid the refs.  If we lose, its only because he didn't.  The players, coaches, etc... are completely irrelevant.  lol

Pretty much 😆

Part of me does kind of wish the NFL would steal one thing from pro wrestling though.

If the referees get knocked down, you ought to be able to hit your opponents with a steel chair and then act like nobody saw it.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Toomers said:

What’s their preference? KC and CIN are very similar markets. Both had elite QBs. Both were in SB recently. In a league set up for every team to finish around .500, what’s the preference? 

story lines.  eyeballs.  Ultimately money.  more for the machine to work with surrounding the game if it is KC over the Bengals. 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CRA said:

story lines.  eyeballs.    more for the machine to work with if it is KC over the Bengals. 

What story line? Why didn’t they take out the Bengals last year when they were a plucky underdog? Wouldn’t Mahomes against Rams been more attractive then?  The machine? Eyeballs? LOL

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Diehardpanth02 said:

Fight me. This is an entertainment program. This isn't competitive sports. To many stories line up to increase the talking points (the Kelce brothers), Mahomes on a Brady chase, the refs making questionable calls in favor of only one direction. You name it, no way so many coincidence. It all just seems odd to me.

I could be wrong. But in a sports betting world, how does the house know where to bet. It's only when they know the odds, or control the deck.

All just seems to scripted to me. I literally could've guessed the outcome of this game after the first quarter.

I usually dismiss crap like this, but my god was that game officiated so blatantly horrible.  At this point, I wouldn't doubt it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...