Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Carr Watch


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It doesn't seem like we have much interest at top market value. I mean, if we like several QBs in the draft then the draft would be the smart move. 

If it's as tight lipped as the coaching hire we may not know what they are thinking until draft night. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It doesn't seem like we have much interest at top market value. I mean, if we like several QBs in the draft then the draft would be the smart move. 

This^^^^
The whole situation is bad.. Carr market value  desperation in the market.. Says this is going to be a bidding war and who wants to be in a bidding war for a 32 year old meh QB??? Smh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Kentucky Panther said:

I have no doubt the Panthers are interested in Carr. We sign him and we are immediately the favorites in the division for the foreseeable future. Best QB, best coach, and best defense. It seems we are letting the more desperate teams take their shots first, and I think that is a smart move. Let someone else make a mistake by overpaying. 
 

Im in on this guy for the right price. 

Why???

You win the division but still have no chance of winning the superbowl.. 
 

Reich said “ Winning the division and making the playoffs is the floor competing for Super Bowl is the exception “ ..

Carr at 30 mil+ a year goes against that..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jon Snow said:

If it's as tight lipped as the coaching hire we may not know what they are thinking until draft night. 

Definitely.

As far as Carr, my attitude is the same as with the draft.

We have a coaching staff and leadership that I trust, so I'll sign on to what they decide.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Definitely.

As far as Carr, my attitude is the same as with the draft.

We have a coaching staff and leadership that I trust, so I'll sign on to what they decide.

I will trust but will lose some confidence if Vet QB retread is the path they take…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Carr can be a nice bridge QB imo, but who here really believes Carr would defeat Burrow, Mahomes, or a newer superstar QB in the SB? No chance. That means no SB with Carr, and hence he is a bridge QB. Offer him a bridge QB contract, and if he turns his nose up, then who gives a poop? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Definitely.

As far as Carr, my attitude is the same as with the draft.

We have a coaching staff and leadership that I trust, so I'll sign on to what they decide.

About the only thing I can trust going forward is that it can't possibly be any worse. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
×
×
  • Create New...