Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

QB options sorted in preference tiers


JawnyBlaze
 Share

Recommended Posts

People are way too thirsty being okay trading 2-3 1sts for one of these QB’s. 
 

You don’t have to like Corral, but compare full snap game tapes of him vs. Stroud/Young, and tell me there is 3 1st round difference in the tape.

 

Take emotion out of it, and compare the physical ability, arm talent, mobility, decision making, etc.

 

It’s tolerable trading up to 5-6 range, but trading with the Bears?…sheesh. 


We are in prime position to strengthen our team all over, and people want to give it all away for a maybe. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Wundrbread33 said:

People are way too thirsty being okay trading 2-3 1sts for one of these QB’s. 
 

You don’t have to like Corral, but compare full snap game tapes of him vs. Stroud/Young, and tell me there is 3 1st round difference in the tape.

 

Take emotion out of it, and compare the physical ability, arm talent, mobility, decision making, etc.

 

It’s tolerable trading up to 5-6 range, but trading with the Bears?…sheesh. 


We are in prime position to strengthen our team all over, and people want to give it all away for a maybe. 

I agree.  All we see is teams going "all in" on a QB in the draft or free agency and getting burned. 

I am of the mindset to let them fight over the QBs and trade back a few spots--add a TE, DB, and draft a QB later.  Hooker (everyone says he is a system QB, and that is part of it--but the defense was game planning vs. that system too) or Hall or Tune later might turn out to be the best investment. We really need a TE--Darnold, Baker needed a TE.  It does so much to the defense when you have to put a DB on a TE and shadow the QB.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Wundrbread33 said:

People are way too thirsty being okay trading 2-3 1sts for one of these QB’s. 
 

You don’t have to like Corral, but compare full snap game tapes of him vs. Stroud/Young, and tell me there is 3 1st round difference in the tape.

 

Take emotion out of it, and compare the physical ability, arm talent, mobility, decision making, etc.

 

It’s tolerable trading up to 5-6 range, but trading with the Bears?…sheesh. 


We are in prime position to strengthen our team all over, and people want to give it all away for a maybe. 

There’s a three first round difference between Corral and Stroud. And I liked Corral a lot, but Stroud is that good.  Stroud’s throws, decision making, development, everything is way ahead of Corral whether you’re comparing college performance or the limited amount we saw in preseason.  I’ve watched all of the full snap count videos I could find on both (as well as every other prospect for the past few years) and Stroud is just incomparable. Absolutely worth three firsts. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Wundrbread33 said:

People are way too thirsty being okay trading 2-3 1sts for one of these QB’s. 
 

You don’t have to like Corral, but compare full snap game tapes of him vs. Stroud/Young, and tell me there is 3 1st round difference in the tape.

 

Take emotion out of it, and compare the physical ability, arm talent, mobility, decision making, etc.

 

It’s tolerable trading up to 5-6 range, but trading with the Bears?…sheesh. 


We are in prime position to strengthen our team all over, and people want to give it all away for a maybe. 

I can easily watch tape and see a difference between Stroud, Young and Corral.. Not to mention their tape has a lot more games played because they aren’t injury prone like Corral is..

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

I can easily watch tape and see a difference between Stroud, Young and Corral.. Not to mention their tape has a lot more games played because they aren’t injury prone like Corral is..

poo on it all you want but if you can’t see the difference between Stroud, Young vs Corral.. Then honestly I don’t know what film or video your watching.. 

1. Productions isn’t even close

2. both played in a more pro systems then Corral..

3. Both are more accurate and throw with more anticipation..

4. Both make more plays off script then Corral ever did.. 

 

it’s not even close…

Edited by WOW!!
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

1. Stroud or young whatever you have to give up..

2. Trade less assets to 5 and get Levis

3. Stay and wait on Richardson sign a vet bridge

4. Trade 9 for Fields

5. Get Hooker in the second round sign vet bridge

6. Resign Sam and work on Corral

 

Biased against Corral. That’s fine but at least be honest. 
 

How many games did he miss in college because of injury?

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WOW!! said:

poo on it all you want but if you can’t see the difference between Stroud, Young vs Corral.. Then honestly I don’t know what film or video your watching.. 

1. Productions isn’t even close

2. both played in a more pro systems then Corral..

3. Both are more accurate and throw with more anticipation..

4. Both make more plays off script then Corral ever did.. 

 

it’s not even close…

I mean the nfl pretty much told us what they think of corral last April.  

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. Trade up to #1 for Stroud

2. Trade up to #3 for Stroud or Young if either of them fall during the draft

3. Take Richardson at 9

4. Resign Sam and see if Frank can coach up Sam or Corral

5. Sign Carr, I have this at 5 because of his contract size, not because of his talent.

6. I don't want any of the other poo, no to trading for fields, no to trading for Jackson even though he's the best QB available, no to drafting Will Levis

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • One thing about it, he's not thinking about retiring. I found it odd that some Huddlers were taking rumors and running with them, imagining a slow down and "up-playing" injuries. Moton feels great and is still in his prime according to him, and his game is still indicative of his thoughts.  Sure, it may ultimately come down to economics, but I am sure that everyone involved is motivated to keep him in Charlotte.
    • I think the knee stuff with Moton has been blown way out of proportion. The exact quote was “It’s chronic stuff. Most linemen deal with it. But it’s just figuring out what we can do to make sure it’s limited and I’m still able to explode off it, which right now I can and I feel like I can in the future,” After a while, you start learning more about it and what can we do to make sure it’s as little of an issue as possible. I feel like I’m moving like I was when I was younger.” I don't view that as a guy who's saying his knees are on their last leg I see that as a 10-year NFL olineman saying that obviously after 10 years of playing a really physical sport, he's never truly gonna be 100% healthy again and he's gonna need to spend more time with the training staff to ensure his body can continue to perform at a high level. I think Moton has another 3 to 5 years left if he wants to continue playing.   
    • So much crying. Tiresome. All of you should have had enough time to come to terms with the team picking up his 5th year... 
×
×
  • Create New...