Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

10 reasons


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, Luciu5 said:

Carr is fine. Top half of the league guy currently. We will win games with Carr. That will be fun to watch winning football. He'll never get us to the super bowl. We will pick 18-28 next year and Carr has to prove he can do it or the younger guys we are mentoring and grooming will take over and get us to the promised land. Then he becomes an expensive backup who can start and maybe do a Nick Foles impression in the even of injury to our starter.

FIFY

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Luciu5 said:

Carr is fine. Top half of the league guy currently. We will win games with Carr. That will be fun to watch winning football. He'll never get us to the super bowl. We will pick 18-28 every year. We won't have any hope of a franchise QB until after he moves on or retires. Panthers will continue to be a media afterthought.

Ya gotta get to the dance...that's all that matters.  I'm ready for a QB that consistently get to the playoffs, period, end of story.  Carr does that.

One player does not a Super Bowl team make, even the very best of the very best only get a shot or two at the Owl...we need to take more shots.

If you want to go trade for Mahommes, Herbert, Allen or Burrow...I'm all in.  Trade it all.

Moving up in the draft to take Stroud, sitting at 9 and grabbing AR....doesn't guarantee you anything other than a 1st round QB on your roster.  Which is great...but that doesn't mean he's good, or will consistently get you to the playoffs....or beyond...but adding Carr does.

We need to win, and soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, thefuzz said:

Ya gotta get to the dance...that's all that matters.  I'm ready for a QB that consistently get to the playoffs, period, end of story.  Carr does that.

One player does not a Super Bowl team make, even the very best of the very best only get a shot or two at the Owl...we need to take more shots.

If you want to go trade for Mahommes, Herbert, Allen or Burrow...I'm all in.  Trade it all.

Moving up in the draft to take Stroud, sitting at 9 and grabbing AR....doesn't guarantee you anything other than a 1st round QB on your roster.  Which is great...but that doesn't mean he's good, or will consistently get you to the playoffs....or beyond...but adding Carr does.

We need to win, and soon.

Carr seems to have regressed badly. Even his buddy Devanta Adams didn’t shed tears when he was benched and released 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/22/2023 at 11:58 AM, JawnyBlaze said:

I mean, he was a legit leading candidate for MVP that year and if the Eagles had not traded up and got him they wouldn’t have won their first ever Super Bowl. So I think they’d say it was worth it. 

I was going to say - isn't the aim of the game to win the SuperBowl?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OldhamA said:

I was going to say - isn't the aim of the game to win the SuperBowl?

1st goal.  Win the division.

2nd goal.  Host a home playoff game.

3rd goal.  Win game.

4th goal.  Host second home playoff game.

5th goal.  Go to Super Bowl.

6th goal.  Win the Lombardi.

 

You have to get to goal 1 to have a decent shot at goal 3, 4 or 5.  The idea is to keep getting chances to catch fire and get healthy at the same time.  I'm All In on winning an Owl, but I'm more interested in consistency and controlling our division so we can get more shots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, thefuzz said:

1st goal.  Win the division.

2nd goal.  Host a home playoff game.

3rd goal.  Win game.

4th goal.  Host second home playoff game.

5th goal.  Go to Super Bowl.

6th goal.  Win the Lombardi.

 

You have to get to goal 1 to have a decent shot at goal 3, 4 or 5.  The idea is to keep getting chances to catch fire and get healthy at the same time.  I'm All In on winning an Owl, but I'm more interested in consistency and controlling our division so we can get more shots.

Are we getting into the old "just win one Super Bowl and I'm good for the next 20 years" debate again?

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Are we getting into the old "just win one Super Bowl and I'm good for the next 20 years" debate again?

The nice thing about that is it is non binding. Just win one and then if we win another I’ll be good for the next twenty all over again. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Are we getting into the old "just win one Super Bowl and I'm good for the next 20 years" debate again?

Seems like it.

Personally, I'd just prefer to try to be the Packers, Steelers, Ravens, etc....learn how to win consistently and take your shots when you get close.

Just frustrating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

There's a few more than that, but they're not all starters.

Brady retiring (again) took all of his off the table.

This so dumb. You’re telling me the Bengals, Charger and Bills haven’t found their QB since they haven’t won the SB yet?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A team should always be putting at least one or two draft picks in at tackle and guard each season. Those guys just don't last nearly long enough and those that do get very, very expensive. In our situation, we need a little more time to see what the Icky injury works itself out to. Njiman performed really well out there and if this injury lingers into the next season, then he might do well enough there to hold the line for the team. Or we could draft early if there is a stud LOT in the draft when our spot comes along.  Honestly, we may be looking at replacing both LT and RT this season at this point. Moton is getting long in the tooth and while he deserves a shot to go for a playoff run with this team, I don't know whether we will really see him come back next season yet. It's still so darned early in all of this to say.
    • Because we had a ton of things go our way this year and made the playoffs with a -70 point differential.  This year was the outlier.  Regression to the mean is unavoidable.  So the team will have to significantly improve to beat 8 wins next year.
    • One thing I noticed in this game (and I say this as the biggest of Bryce Young haters) is that Bryce did do a solid job of throwing into voids in this game, and leading receivers on crossers.  There were a few times where I was thinking "where the hell is he throwing it" only for a receiver to appear out of nowhere and catch it in stride.  Mike McDaniel might be a guy that can squeeze a little bit of production out of the otherwise ghastly Bryce Young. His offenses heavily feature that style of passing game.  I've heard Idzik is drawing interest from other teams.  If so, bringing McDaniel in at OC would be a stellar move.  I know it'll never happen, but fun to think about. 
×
×
  • Create New...