Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

In-Depth Film Evaluation on QB Anthony Richardson


Saca312
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Basbear said:

You got anything in mind thus far?? Still got a few weeks and I normal come up with the bets. Doesnt matter to me, I read your posts and dont think we are in much difference thoughts. 

Plus LOL at you still rockin the avatar! 

Let’s see if we can cook with QB order for the top 4, will all four go top 10, Richardson before Levis, first offensive player taken that’s a non QB, who makes the first trade, etc. I’m wide open for ideas this year 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Varking said:

Let’s see if we can cook with QB order for the top 4, will all four go top 10, Richardson before Levis, first offensive player taken that’s a non QB, who makes the first trade, etc. I’m wide open for ideas this year 

I believe 4 QBs will go before the 10th pick. We can run with that if you are game. 

The others, I do not feel I have a firm opinion currently. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

If the price for 1 is too steep, I could really see us jumping to 3 and drafting either Stroud, AR, or Young.  You could switch Levis for one of those is our staff is high enough on him.

Cardinals sound like they wanna move back, At least this staff knows what an NFL QB looks like and can actually do useful board work in the interviews compared to our last coaching crew. I wanted to like Corral but he didn't seem like the brightest guy in the world during the Draft Confidential clips from last year

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't get the hype for Richardson from the media & some posters here. He is basically one football year past high school, like Trubisky or Haskins before him but with much less production to show for it, IMO. I hope I'm wrong but I just don't see Saturdays performance translating into Sundays. As a general guideline I would never draft a one year college starter in any position in the first round & barely in the second, IMO. I know that there are exceptions to every draft guideline put forward by every talking head or poster here but this is one of mine. Thankfully my tenure as chief football observer & broom operator in my house is not in any jeopardy [my TV, my remote] if I am wrong or right.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, nogoodbum said:

I don't get the hype for Richardson from the media & some posters here. He is basically one football year past high school, like Trubisky or Haskins before him but with much less production to show for it, IMO. I hope I'm wrong but I just don't see Saturdays performance translating into Sundays. As a general guideline I would never draft a one year college starter in any position in the first round & barely in the second, IMO. I know that there are exceptions to every draft guideline put forward by every talking head or poster here but this is one of mine. Thankfully my tenure as chief football observer & broom operator in my house is not in any jeopardy [my TV, my remote] if I am wrong or right.

That hype is only on ESPN. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It will be really interesting to see how both sides handle this. I'm sure the team would love to get him signed to a 4 year deal based on his output so far and some potential factored in, i.e. something like a 4 year $30 million contract.  But I could see his agent telling him the best path is to take the one year offer, put up a big year next year and then really cash in. The team also has to keep in mind T-Mac's 2nd contract, which likely will happen after the 2027 season assuming he keeps improving as expected.  Even if we could get him on a budget 4 year deal for what he could become, the problem then becomes when he wants to re-negotiate in 2 years during the same summer we will extend T-Mac, and you don't want to spend that much on WRs in one offseason, just see the Bengals this last year. Taking everything into consideration, I'm thinking the 1 year deal and then getting him to sign a 4-5 year deal after hopefully say a 800ish yard season next year might be best for our cap situation and separate his and T-Mac's negotiation periods.
    • And yet jax made it no further than we did, and its very possible the Pats don't either. I think it speaks more to the overall down year for the nfl as far as having great/dominant teams, every team this year has fatal flaws that can be exploited 
    • Ehhh I agree the nfc is stronger this year but their really werent any truly dominant teams this year everyone is flawed, I think the narrative for the NFL this year will to try ahd force a Josh Allen SB win
×
×
  • Create New...