Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

In-Depth Film Evaluation on QB Anthony Richardson


Saca312
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Basbear said:

You got anything in mind thus far?? Still got a few weeks and I normal come up with the bets. Doesnt matter to me, I read your posts and dont think we are in much difference thoughts. 

Plus LOL at you still rockin the avatar! 

Let’s see if we can cook with QB order for the top 4, will all four go top 10, Richardson before Levis, first offensive player taken that’s a non QB, who makes the first trade, etc. I’m wide open for ideas this year 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Varking said:

Let’s see if we can cook with QB order for the top 4, will all four go top 10, Richardson before Levis, first offensive player taken that’s a non QB, who makes the first trade, etc. I’m wide open for ideas this year 

I believe 4 QBs will go before the 10th pick. We can run with that if you are game. 

The others, I do not feel I have a firm opinion currently. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

If the price for 1 is too steep, I could really see us jumping to 3 and drafting either Stroud, AR, or Young.  You could switch Levis for one of those is our staff is high enough on him.

Cardinals sound like they wanna move back, At least this staff knows what an NFL QB looks like and can actually do useful board work in the interviews compared to our last coaching crew. I wanted to like Corral but he didn't seem like the brightest guy in the world during the Draft Confidential clips from last year

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't get the hype for Richardson from the media & some posters here. He is basically one football year past high school, like Trubisky or Haskins before him but with much less production to show for it, IMO. I hope I'm wrong but I just don't see Saturdays performance translating into Sundays. As a general guideline I would never draft a one year college starter in any position in the first round & barely in the second, IMO. I know that there are exceptions to every draft guideline put forward by every talking head or poster here but this is one of mine. Thankfully my tenure as chief football observer & broom operator in my house is not in any jeopardy [my TV, my remote] if I am wrong or right.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, nogoodbum said:

I don't get the hype for Richardson from the media & some posters here. He is basically one football year past high school, like Trubisky or Haskins before him but with much less production to show for it, IMO. I hope I'm wrong but I just don't see Saturdays performance translating into Sundays. As a general guideline I would never draft a one year college starter in any position in the first round & barely in the second, IMO. I know that there are exceptions to every draft guideline put forward by every talking head or poster here but this is one of mine. Thankfully my tenure as chief football observer & broom operator in my house is not in any jeopardy [my TV, my remote] if I am wrong or right.

That hype is only on ESPN. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Rico walking is no big deal. I'll take a healthy 2024 Hubbard over Rico any time and losing Mays is, again, no a big deal.  Young is signed for what, $35M for the next two years? Say he wants $50M but the FO doesn't. If they put the franchise tag on him, that would be around $55? So basically they are getting Young for the next 3 years for an average of $30M per year. Putting the franchise tag on him wouldn't be my first choice but it gives them an option that wouldn't be locking him into a long term, $50M contract. I'm not suggestion they do that. Just that the option will be there should they get to that point. Hunt is on a 5 year deal which is done in 28 so he either restructures or is gone anyway. Moton will be 35 by then and will either be gone or have diminished playing time. Neither of those players has anything to do with getting Young a contract. The O line is way overpaid anyway. Hopefully by the time they are gone, Freeling and Hecht will be developed and Ickey will be healthy. Young was benched his second year and only got his job back because Dalton was injured. Not sure how you can call that entitled. And I would NOT say putting a rookie QB on a team with no receivers, tight ends or O lineman and then being put with a coach who never wanted you and is fired mid season, is a definition of luck. As far as competition, no team is going to bring in competition for a QB picked first overall - especially given the capital that was given up to get him.  
    • With apologies to Lady Cowboy fan, any day we can screw over the Cowboys is a GOOD day…
    • Been here since 2014ish. Good times. Its a shame Zod wont sell, it wouldnt take that much effort to get this place back into shape.
×
×
  • Create New...